Fed Stress Test: Major US Banks Can Absorb $708 Billion in Losses Amid Severe Recession
Quick Look
- The Federal Reserve's annual stress test revealed that 32 major U.S. banks could absorb over $708 billion in losses during a severe global recession, maintaining lending capacity.
- Despite positive results, the findings will not immediately alter capital requirements as regulators rework the methodology, with industry focus shifting to the upcoming Basel III Endgame proposal.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The Federal Reserve conducts annual stress tests to assess the resilience of large banks to adverse economic conditions, ensuring they can continue lending during a severe recession.
The biggest U.S. banks would be able to absorb more than $708 billion in losses in a severe global recession while continuing to lend to households and businesses, according to the Federal Reserve's annual stress test released Wednesday.
All 32 banks examined by the Fed remained above their minimum capital requirements under the regulator's hypothetical scenario, which included unemployment surging to 10%, a 39% drop in commercial real estate prices and a 30% decline in home prices.
The industry's common equity tier 1 capital ratio, a key capital measure that would absorb losses in a downturn, fell by 1.6 percentage points during the exercise, remaining comfortably above required minimums. Projected losses for the group included roughly $200 billion tied to credit cards, $160 billion from commercial and industrial loans and $75 billion from commercial real estate.
"Today's results underscore the strength of the banking system," Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman said in a release.
The annual exercise comes at a pivotal moment for bank regulation because, unlike in previous years, the results will not affect the amount of capital large banks are required to hold.
That's because the Fed said in February that it would leave the stress test buffers untouched until 2027 as regulators rework the methodology, heeding industry complaints, a move that could eventually reshape how much capital firms must hold against future downturns.
In a June 21 research note that described this year's exercise as "going through the motions," KBW analysts led by Christopher McGratty said banks are likely to remain focused on the pending Basel III Endgame proposal expected later this year rather than the stress test results themselves.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Regulators will release the Basel III Endgame proposal later this year.
Likely · Within months
Open Questions
- What specific changes will be included in the reworked Basel III Endgame proposal?
- How will the new methodology for stress test buffers affect capital requirements after 2027?






