Newsgather
BackGOP Senators Erupt Over Trump Admin's $1.8B 'Anti-Weaponization' Fund
GOP Senators Erupt Over Trump Admin's $1.8B 'Anti-Weaponization' Fund
Urgent
The Independent World5/23/2026Politics3 min read

GOP Senators Erupt Over Trump Admin's $1.8B 'Anti-Weaponization' Fund

Quick Look

  • Republican senators reportedly erupted in anger during a closed-door meeting defending the Trump administration's controversial $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund.
  • Ted Cruz described the meeting as one of the roughest he's witnessed, with many senators accusing the acting AG of self-dealing.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

Republican senators expressed significant anger and frustration during a closed-door meeting regarding the Trump administration's $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund. The fund was announced after President Trump dropped a lawsuit against the IRS, leading to accusations of self-dealing.

Font size

Republican senators erupted behind closed doors this week as acting Attorney General Todd Blanche tried to defend the Trump administration’s controversial $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, according to a prominent GOP lawmaker.

It was a meeting that Sen. Ted Cruz later described on his podcast as one of the “roughest” he has witnessed during his time in Congress.

“Fiery does not begin to cut it,” Cruz said Friday on his podcast, “Verdict with Ted Cruz.” “My guess is there’re probably 45 senators in the room, at least half of them were blasting the attorney general, and they were p*****.”

The “anti-weaponization” fund was announced Monday after Trump agreed to drop his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS. Cruz said many GOP lawmakers argued the proposal would be politically impossible to defend because it appeared President Donald Trump had “cut a deal with himself,” NBC News reported.

“There were multiple senators yelling at the attorney general, saying this feels like self-dealing,” Cruz said. “I got to tell you, the Republican senators were p***** – people were the entire meeting. They were screaming at the acting attorney general, and he was trying to lay out the legal basis,” Cruz said. Cruz added that “the legal basis is quite sound.”

Cruz said Senate Republicans were on the verge of rebelling over the proposal. Had the Senate moved forward Thursday night with a planned series of votes on the ICE and Border Patrol funding package, he said, roughly half of the Republican caucus was prepared to join Democrats in supporting amendments to restrict the fund.

He discussed “the degree of the jailbreak of Republicans who were bolting, who were saying we’re going to vote with the Democrats.”

Cruz warned the administration could face a major showdown when lawmakers return to Washington if changes are not made to modify the fund.

“If the administration doesn’t fix this,” he said, “they’ve got a full-on revolt in the Senate.”

In response to Cruz’s comments, a White House official told The Independent they appreciated the conversation and feedback and will have additional conversations as needed. The Independent has also contracted the DOJ for comment.

Concerns about the fund have continued to spread among Republicans.

The White House “put themselves in a bad spot. It wasn’t Congress that did it. Congress has had no input. Might be part of the problem,” said Sen. Bill Cassidy.

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., criticized it as a “payout pot for punks,” pointing to the possibility that people convicted in connection with the Jan. 6 Capitol riot could potentially receive compensation.

Democrats have also sharply condemned the proposal. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., wrote in a letter to Blanche on Wednesday that “the notion of the federal government doling out compensation to rioters” is “absurd and offensive.”

On Thursday, Reps. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y., and Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., introduced bipartisan legislation that would prohibit federal funds from being used for the program.

Trump posted on Truth Social on Friday, making clear that he wasn’t backing down on the fund.

“I could have settled my case…for an absolute fortune,” he wrote. “Instead, I am helping others, who were so badly abused.”

The Senate is scheduled to return June 1, which is the same day Trump has said he wants to sign the ICE and Border Patrol funding bill into law.

What to Watch

AI outlook — possibilities, not facts

  • A major legislative showdown will occur in the Senate if the administration does not modify the fund.

    Very likely · Within weeks

  • Bipartisan legislation to prohibit federal funds for the program will advance.

    Possible · Within weeks

Open Questions

  • What specific legal basis is the administration using to defend the fund?
  • Will the administration make changes to the fund to appease Republican concerns?
  • What are the specific criteria for who could receive compensation from the fund?
  • What is the exact amount of the Trump lawsuit against the IRS that was dropped?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by The Independent World.

Related Stories

Federal Judge Apologizes to Former Law Clerk for Misconduct
Developing·30m ago

Federal Judge Apologizes to Former Law Clerk for Misconduct

U.S. District Judge Eleanor Ross apologized to a former law clerk for "harmful, offensive, and unprofessional behavior," including sexual activity in her chambers and lying about it. An investigation confirmed allegations of sex in the courthouse and initial denial of claims. Ross received a private reprimand and agreed to write apology letters to former clerks. Impeachment resolutions have been filed against her.

The Independent World
More on this topicTrump administration