Iran Lawmaker Criticizes Pakistan Nuclear Talks as "Strategic Mistake"
Iranian parliament member says raising nuclear issue during Pakistan negotiations weakened Tehran's position; Trump warns "clock is ticking"
Quick Look
- Iranian parliamentarian Mahmoud Nabavian criticized negotiations with the US held in Pakistan, calling it a "strategic mistake" to raise Tehran's nuclear programme.
- He said Washington demanded Iran remove and freeze its 60% enriched uranium stockpile for 20 years, conditions Tehran rejected.
- US President Trump said he has "all the time in the world" while warning Iran the clock is ticking.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Iran and the US have been in ongoing tensions regarding Iran's nuclear programme. Recent negotiations held in Pakistan marked a rare diplomatic engagement between the two nations. The US has imposed sanctions and maintained a blockade against Iran while demanding concessions on Tehran's nuclear capabilities.
A member of Iran's parliamentary national security and foreign policy committee, Mahmoud Nabavian, has criticised recent negotiations with the United States held in Pakistan, calling the decision to raise Tehran's nuclear programme a "strategic mistake." In a video clip shared from an interview with SNN TV and later posted on X, Nabavian said that putting Iran's nuclear issue on the table during talks in Pakistan had weakened Tehran's position. "In the Pakistan negotiations, we made a strategic mistake. We should not have put the nuclear issue up for negotiation," he said, adding that "by doing so, the enemy became bolder," as translated by ANI. According to Nabavian, Washington demanded that Iran's stockpile of 60 per cent enriched uranium be removed and frozen for 20 years; conditions he said Tehran rejected. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump struck a defiant tone, downplaying pressure to end the ongoing conflict. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he was in no rush to reach an agreement and warned that time was working against Iran. "I have all the time in the world, but Iran doesn't — the clock is ticking," he wrote, asserting that Iran's military capabilities had been severely degraded and that a blockade against the country remained firmly in place. He added that any deal would be finalised only if it aligned with US interests and those of its allies. Separately, a report by Politico noted that during hearings on Capitol Hill, senior US officials avoided committing to a timeline for easing energy prices. Some Republican lawmakers indicated that the 60-day mark in the conflict could be critical in determining their continued support.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Further US-Iran negotiations unlikely in near term given hardened positions
Likely · Within weeks
Republican pressure on Trump to secure resolution by 60-day mark
Possible · Within weeks
Open Questions
- What specific concessions did Pakistan make during the negotiations?
- Will there be further rounds of negotiations?
- How will Iran respond to US demands in the coming weeks?