IRDAI Seeks Standard Definitions for Claims and Settlement Ratio
Quick Look
IRDAI has urged the non-life insurance sector to establish standard definitions for 'claim' and 'claim settlement ratio' to ensure consistency and transparency in reporting, addressing discrepancies in how companies currently calculate this key financial and customer satisfaction metric.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The IRDAI has requested the non-life insurance industry to standardize definitions for 'claim' and 'claim settlement ratio' due to varying practices among companies. This aims to provide a clearer picture of a company's claim settlement standards.
MUMBAI: IRDAI has asked the non-life industry to come up with a standard definition of claim and a uniform definition of claim settlement ratio for various lines of business. This followed different companies using different definitions for determining claim settlement ratio, a key metric that is an indicator of companies' financial health and customer satisfaction. Some companies register a claim at the first instance while others do so after establishing liability under a policy. While for the layman a 'settled claim' is one where the insurance company has paid to their satisfaction, some insurance companies treat claims closed by them for non-availability of documents or claims rejected for not coming within the scope of the policy as settled claims. While this helps the numbers add up, it gives a uneven picture of how many customers are getting what they claimed. "The general insurance council has submitted their views on standard definition of claim and uniform approach to define claim settlement ratio for various lines of business to IRDAI as required by them. This is to ensure that a clear picture emerges in regard to a company's claim settlement standards without variation in different approaches by each company at various steps," said an industry source. " In simple reality a claim can be treated as settled only if the client confirms that it is settled. Till that is done, the claim remains pending / disputed " said KK Srinivasan, former member non-life at IRDAI. He added that if a claim is repudiated by an insurance company, it can be disputed legally within 3 years of repudiation and will remain disputed till the court disposes it off. "Once a court admits the repudiation or dispute for hearing, it has to be treated as unsettled till the court or forum disposes it off and the order of the court is complied with," he added. While companies ask claimants to give a discharge voucher saying they accept the full and final settlement, there are many claims where the customer is not satisfied. The definition of a claim is essential to determining the incurred claims ratio which determines underwriting profits. A broad definition of a claim would mean that insurers would have to set aside funds for every demand made from them even when they do not have active cover. "The claim settlement ratio has to be seen over a period of time. It is possible for a company to have a claim settlement ratio of over 100 if it settles all claims and the claims pending from the previous year," said the former CEO of a non-life company.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The general insurance council will finalize and submit a revised proposal for standard definitions to IRDAI.
Very likely · Within weeks
IRDAI will issue a formal circular or regulation mandating the new definitions.
Likely · Within months
Open Questions
- What is the timeline for the implementation of these new definitions?
- Will there be penalties for non-compliance?
- How will previously reported data be re-evaluated?
- What specific criteria will be used to define 'settled claim'?
