Jury asked to consider pain of accusers in Sir Jeffrey Donaldson trial

The jury in the trial of Sir Jeffrey Donaldson has been asked to recall the "pain and hurt still so visible" on the two women who have accused him of sexually abusing them when they were children.

In her closing speech, prosecution barrister Rosemary Walsh KC described "the long and arduous process" the women, known as Complainant A and B, had experienced after making their allegations.

"This is no walk in the park. This is not something they are doing for the fun of it or the sake of it," she told the jury.

The jury is also being asked to consider findings against his wife, Lady Eleanor Donaldson, in a trial of the facts. She denies five related charges of aiding and abetting.

Walsh told the jury it was human nature to "box" or "shelve" feelings away – and that was what Complainant A and B had done over the years.

However, she said there had been "turning points" in both women's lives that prompted them to finally report their allegations to the police in March 2024.

"Today you see two women at a time when they are ready for this, but they've not always been that way," Walsh said.

The barrister told the jury that Complainant A knew "this would not be a normal case" because of who Sir Jeffrey was.

"She had to grapple with all the connotations that came with that," Walsh said.

"It was a huge, huge decision to make and not one she made lightly."

Walsh described how Complainant B had blamed herself for Complainant A's alleged abuse because she had not made her allegations sooner.

She said despite Complainant B having previously told a number of people - including a Christian pastor, the founders of a Christian centre, and a friend - that she had been abused as a child, she did not set out "the gory details" because "no one asked her".

Sir Jeffrey denies acts of gross indecency and indecent assault against Complainant A when she was a child, between 1999 and 2008.