Breaking
ESJürgen Klopp, nuevo seleccionador de Alemania, promete revivir la selecciónESFrancia afronta incendios forestales sin precedentes con más de 140.000 evacuadosESIncendios en Madrid y Ávila: Frentes se fusionan, día crítico para evitar mayor uniónESIncendios en España: Críticas a Marlaska por falta de previsión y 10.000 evacuadosESLa UE acoge con cautela los nuevos aranceles de Trump, pero cuestiona su justificaciónESJuez Calama mantiene investigación a Zapatero por rescate de Plus UltraESGuardia Civil detiene a una persona e investiga a otra por incendio forestal en Burgohondo (Ávila)ESEspaña: Incendios forestales provocan emergencia nacional y miles de desalojosESEl Gobierno reactivará la tramitación de la Autoridad en Defensa del Cliente FinancieroESEl Tribunal Supremo aplica la Ley de Amnistía a ocho condenados por desobediencia y desórdenes públicosESJürgen Klopp, nuevo seleccionador de Alemania, promete revivir la selecciónESFrancia afronta incendios forestales sin precedentes con más de 140.000 evacuadosESIncendios en Madrid y Ávila: Frentes se fusionan, día crítico para evitar mayor uniónESIncendios en España: Críticas a Marlaska por falta de previsión y 10.000 evacuadosESLa UE acoge con cautela los nuevos aranceles de Trump, pero cuestiona su justificaciónESJuez Calama mantiene investigación a Zapatero por rescate de Plus UltraESGuardia Civil detiene a una persona e investiga a otra por incendio forestal en Burgohondo (Ávila)ESEspaña: Incendios forestales provocan emergencia nacional y miles de desalojosESEl Gobierno reactivará la tramitación de la Autoridad en Defensa del Cliente FinancieroESEl Tribunal Supremo aplica la Ley de Amnistía a ocho condenados por desobediencia y desórdenes públicos
Newsgather
BackJustice Elena Kagan: Supreme Court Not a 'Puppet' for Trump
Justice Elena Kagan: Supreme Court Not a 'Puppet' for Trump
Politics
ABC News18 hours agoPolitics4 min readUnited States

Justice Elena Kagan: Supreme Court Not a 'Puppet' for Trump

Quick Look

  • Justice Elena Kagan stated the conservative Supreme Court is not a "puppet" for President Trump, citing rulings against his tariffs and birthright citizenship efforts, despite siding with his administration in many cases.
  • She also discussed the court's ethics code and Trump's attendance at oral arguments.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

Justice Elena Kagan addressed lawyers and judges from the 9th U.S. Circuit, asserting that the deeply conservative Supreme Court has, at significant times, checked the executive branch, specifically citing rulings against former President Trump's tariffs and birthright citizenship efforts. She also discussed the court's first code of ethics and Trump's unprecedented attendance at oral arguments.

Font size

BELLEVUE, Wash. -- The U.S. Supreme Court may be deeply conservative, but it is not simply a rubber stamp for President Donald Trump, Justice Elena Kagan said Thursday.

Kagan, one of the court's three liberal justices, told an audience of lawyers and judges from the 9th U.S. Circuit in Bellevue, Washington, that at significant times, on some big issues, “the court has checked the executive branch.”

The court has sided with the Trump administration in the vast majority of cases to come before it so far, including largely upholding his immigration crackdown and expanding Trump's authority over federal regulatory agencies. But Kagan pointed to key rulings where the president did not get what he sought, such as decisions rejecting Trump's sweeping tariffs and his efforts to strip birthright citizenship from the children of people who are in the U.S. illegally.

“Is this court very conservative? Does it do a bunch of things that are out of the playbook of the conservative legal movement that I think are deeply wrong? You know, yes,” Kagan said. “But is this court the kind of puppet for the current administration? I think definitely not.”

Polling has found public trust in the Supreme Court at historic lows in recent years, and a number of critics of the current court have suggested political motivations on the part of its justices. Trump has personally assailed justices who rule against him in stark terms. One liberal justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, said in May after the court struck down a majority-Black district in Louisiana and weakened the Voting Rights Act that the institution risked being seen as political.

Chief Justice John Roberts, who was among those joining the court's liberal justices on some key cases such as birthright citizenship and tariffs, has fought back against the perception that the justices are “political actors,” calling it a misunderstanding.

Kagan, often seen as a bridge-builder, echoed that approach in her comments Thursday, which followed her testimony before Congress alongside conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett last week on security threats and other issues facing the court.

Kagan reiterated her support for appointing a committee of retired judges to enforce the Supreme Court's first code of ethics, adopted in 2023 during a storm of criticism over undisclosed trips and gifts from wealthy benefactors to some justices. While the justices are taking the ethics code seriously, opinions differ on the court about how or whether it might be enforced, and no conclusions have been reached, she said.

Kagan also offered a view from the bench of a historic moment from the court's past term, when Trump himself took a front-row seat for arguments over his birthright citizenship order. He was the first sitting president to attend oral arguments.

It was largely a “non-event” for the justices, Kagan said. Trump took a seat off to the side, in an area relatively far from the bench typically reserved for members of Congress, and the court made no announcement of his presence. Many in the audience couldn't see him, she noted.

“He was just like a person who came in and sat down and then had to listen to an argument,” Kagan said.

The president remained for about half of the lengthy arguments, leaving when the other side began making its case.

“You really did kind of think, he probably has other things to do, you know?” said Kagan, who served as solicitor general during the Obama administration. “I was sort of thinking, I worked for a president, and when a president walks into the room, you get the whole ‘Hail to the Chief' stuff. And there was like none of that. And so, I don’t know, I think he probably won’t come back.”

Open Questions

  • How will the Supreme Court's ethics code be enforced?
  • Will public trust in the Supreme Court improve?
  • Will President Trump attend future oral arguments?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by ABC News.

Related Stories

More on this topicsupreme court