Ladakh activist Sonam Wangchuk sees 'positive step' in talks with Centre
Quick Look
- Activist Sonam Wangchuk acknowledged a "positive step" in recent talks between Ladakh representatives and the Centre, but warned trust-building remains incomplete amid unresolved protest cases and institutional issues.
- He expressed concern over escalating tensions, fearing Ladakh could become "another Manipur."
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Activist Sonam Wangchuk has been a prominent voice in the protests demanding statehood and constitutional safeguards for Ladakh. Recent talks between Ladakh representatives and the Union Home Ministry sub-committee have offered a glimmer of hope, but deep-seated issues persist.
Activist Sonam Wangchuk on Saturday acknowledged a “positive step” between Ladakh representatives and the Centre, though he warned that trust-building in the region remained incomplete amid unresolved protest-related cases from the last year and institutional issues.
In an interview with PTI, Wangchuk said optimism had improved after the recent meeting with the Union home ministry sub-committee, but stressed that the government’s intent would ultimately be judged by action on unresolved issues in the coming weeks.
He also said tensions in Ladakh had recently escalated to a point where he feared the Union Territory could become “another Manipur”, citing growing unrest and divisions between communities.
“Last week was very negative. There was conflict everywhere. I thought Ladakh would become another Manipur; it was heading in that direction,” he said.
Wangchuk said the latest meeting had changed his outlook to some extent.
“This meeting has made some difference... Otherwise, I was very disappointed,” he said, referring to his detention earlier this year.
His remarks came after the Leh Apex Body and Kargil Democratic Alliance held talks with the Centre on demands including statehood, constitutional safeguards for land and jobs, and greater democratic powers for Ladakh.
The groups later said an “in-principle understanding” had been reached on restoring democracy and exploring constitutional protections similar to those under Article 371.
Wangchuk said the release order following his detention had spoken about creating “an environment of trust” and moving towards “meaningful and constructive dialogue”, but claimed the situation on the ground did not reflect those assurances.
“People were getting divided — Leh and Kargil, Buddhists fighting Buddhists, Muslims fighting Muslims. We felt trust-building was not happening, and meaningful dialogue seemed unlikely,” he said.
He added that trust-building would depend on measures such as withdrawal of cases linked to the September 24 protests, restoration of seized devices and resolution of issues related to the Himalayan Institute of Alternatives, Ladakh (HIAL).
Wangchuk also raised concerns over the continued seizure of his mobile phone, confiscated during protests around eight months ago.
“My mobile phone was taken when I was jailed. It has been more than two months since I was released, and I still do not have it back,” he said.
“Without it, I cannot book an Ola, an Uber, or even a plane ticket. Digitally, I have become useless in Digital India,” he added.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Withdrawal of cases linked to the September 24 protests.
Possible · Within weeks
Restoration of seized devices.
Possible · Within weeks
Resolution of issues related to HIAL.
Possible · Within weeks
Open Questions
- Will the government take concrete action on unresolved issues and protest-related cases?
- What specific measures will be taken to rebuild trust between communities in Ladakh?
- Will the seized devices, including Sonam Wangchuk's mobile phone, be returned promptly?
- How will the "in-principle understanding" on restoring democracy and constitutional protections be implemented?