Lululemon Apologizes After Japanese Drum Incident at Great Wall Event
Quick Look
- Lululemon apologized after a promotional yoga festival on the Great Wall of China featured what appeared to be a Japanese taiko drum instead of a Chinese dagu drum.
- The incident sparked an uproar on Chinese social media, with users calling it insulting.
- The brand removed event content and pledged to be more cautious in future.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Lululemon held a yoga festival on the Great Wall of China that included a drum performance which was criticized for using a Japanese instrument. This incident highlights the challenges western brands face in navigating China's cultural sensitivities.
The activewear brand Lululemon has apologised after a promotional event held on the Great Wall of China appeared to mistakenly feature a Japanese drum, prompting an uproar.
The Canadian-headquartered company, known for its upmarket leggings, has been growing rapidly in China and arranged for a yoga festival to take place in late May on a section of the wall near Beijing.
More than 2,000 people were invited to take part in the event, which was advertised as promoting Chinese culture and wellness, according to the Chinese state-run tabloid Global Times, with the well-known Chinese actor Zhu Yilong booked to perform.
Zhu joined a drum group on the Great Wall for what was described as a traditional Chinese drum performance and posted a picture of himself in front of one of the instruments, which had the Lululemon logo on it, on his account on Weibo, one of China’s largest social media platforms.
Weibo users accused the group of using a Japanese taiko instrument rather than a Chinese dagu drum. Many described this as inappropriate and insulting, according to the Global Times. Drum discussions had gathered more than 50m views on Weibo by Monday, and Zhu’s studio called on Lululemon to respond to the controversy.
The brand posted an apology to Zhu and to the public on Weibo on Tuesday, saying the event had been “intended to unwaveringly pay tribute to Chinese culture”.
It said: “Due to limitations in our professional knowledge, we were unable to identify potential controversies initially, and we fully recognise that we should be more cautious and thorough in the early planning and review process of the drum performances.”
The company pledged to “learn profound lessons” and to adopt “a more rigorous attitude” for future events.
Lululemon has now removed all content related to the drum event from its website and social media. The Hiiko drum troupe that performed with Zhu also apologised.
The incident highlights the risks for western brands hoping to expand in China of falling foul of domestic political and cultural sensibilities.
Last year, the outdoor brand Arc’teryx issued an apology after a promotional fireworks display in the Tibetan plateau caused controversy over potential environmental damage.
The Canadian company, part-owned by China’s Anta Group, faced calls for boycotts after the high-altitude show involving long stretches of choreographed pyrotechnics and coloured smoke along snow-topped Himalayan ridgelines.
Open Questions
- Will Lululemon face further repercussions in China?
- What specific measures will Lululemon implement for future events?
