
The author argues that while money may not buy superficial happiness, financial stability and disposable income are crucial for reducing stress, enabling experiences, and ultimately finding meaning and lasting happiness, especially for those struggling financially.
AI-generated summary
When wages have stalled for nearly 20 years and the idea that money can’t buy happiness seems almost offensive, especially when faced with the rising cost of everyday items, it suggests a blinkered concept of what money can do.
While superficial spending may provide fleeting happiness, the author argues that financial stability is crucial. The idea that money can’t buy happiness is challenged by the reality of overpaying on rent; owning a house outright would undoubtedly bring greater happiness. While experiences like spending quality time with loved ones are invaluable, they also require financial resources. Free time, a growing number of basic human needs, has become commodified, and in the current economic climate, more money equates to more time to pursue interests and find meaning.
As someone diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the author considers themselves an expert on dopamine, understanding how to achieve a slow, steady, and prolonged supply rather than a quick hit.
Sources of lasting mental well-being include novelty and awe. The author recalls an experience in rural France where waking up to two feet of snow created a Narnia-like landscape, evoking tears and a sense of awe. This experience, while restorative, was also a lesson in the privilege of being able to afford such a trip, highlighting that transportation to this 'winter wonderland' was facilitated by Ryanair, not just the will to witness beauty.
In the author's experience, more disposable income consistently leads to greater happiness. Financial stability, a rare commodity for a freelance writer, not only reduces stress but also expands one's world. A 2023 study by psychologists at Princeton and the University of Pennsylvania supports this, finding that higher incomes generally correlate with greater happiness, though it acknowledges that money cannot solve all unhappiness.
Elon Musk, on track to become the world's first trillionaire, tweeted earlier this year: “Whoever said ‘money can’t buy happiness’ really knew what they were talking about [sad-face emoji].” The author posits that while money might not buy happiness for Musk, it could provide happiness foundations for billions struggling financially. The article also touches on the isolating nature of being able to solve global issues like hunger and choosing not to.
Finally, the article suggests that hoarding wealth, like Smaug guarding his gold, is not the path to happiness. Perhaps if Smaug engaged with the world and used his fortune for experiences, he might find more contentment.

Entrepreneur Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones highlights the lack of diversity in British farming, noting that 99.7% of English farmers are white. He calls for institutions and supermarkets to create entry routes for minority groups to ensure the industry's future.

Reflecting on the vast wealth of Donald Trump, the author questions the insatiable drive for accumulation among the ultra-rich, contrasting it with the struggles of ordinary Americans and the philanthropic efforts of other billionaires.

Exploring the modern human's urge to mimic technology through cosmetic enhancement and AI adoption, author Joseph de Weck argues that we now inhabit the uncanny valley.

As OpenAI and Anthropic face financial headwinds and profitability questions, this opinion piece argues the US should nationalize them as public agencies if market models fail.

Private pensions have become pernicious financial vehicles allowing older generations to secure disproportionate subsidies at the expense of younger workers, prompting calls for tax break equalisation.

The author reflects on her teenage viral video experience and contrasts it with later instances of intense online hate directed at young girls, highlighting the evolving and often damaging impact of the internet on adolescent self-expression and digital history.