NSW Principal Accused of Antisemitism Wins Court Ruling on Procedural Fairness
Quick Look
- Sheikh Abdulghani Albaf, principal of New Madinah College, won a NSW Supreme Court ruling against the NSW Education Standards Authority (NESA), which found he was denied procedural fairness in an investigation over alleged antisemitic social media comments.
- The ruling means NESA must revisit its determination.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Sheikh Abdulghani Albaf, principal of New Madinah College, was found by the NSW Education Standards Authority (NESA) not to meet "fit and proper requirements" due to alleged antisemitic social media comments, leading to a risk of the school's deregistration.
A New South Wales school principal at the centre of an investigation over alleged antisemitic comments could resume his role after a court ruling in his favour.
Sheikh Abdulghani Albaf took the NSW Education Standards Authority (NESA) and the education minister to court over a finding earlier this year that he did not "meet the fit and proper requirements" of being principal of the New Madinah College at Young.
The Supreme Court has ruled he was not granted procedural fairness during an investigation of alleged antisemitic comments on social media.
Sheikh Albaf's lawyer Stephen Blanks said his client welcomed the ruling.
"The court is absolutely correct in saying the committee failed to discharge its duties appropriately," he said.
"He gave an undertaking in January, well before NESA's decision, that he will not make any further social media posts and he's complied with that undertaking.
The finding came after a lengthy investigation by NESA into the K-10 school, which teaches students the Koran, the Arabic language and Islamic values as well as core subjects.
It followed a 2025 investigation by the NSW and federal education departments into comments about Zionism made over several years from an account bearing the name of Sheikh Albaf.
In February NESA informed the school it risked being deregistered if it did not remove Sheikh Albaf from his position.
In her judgement, Acting Justice Monika Schmidt AM found Sheikh Albaf had been denied procedural fairness by NESA and its Registration and Accreditation Committee because it did not disclose its findings and provide him an opportunity to be heard prior to adopting them.
"I have concluded the Committee’s determination must be set aside, it will have to revisit its determination in light of all the relevant information it receives," she said.
"If the result of its further decision-making process is a recommendation to the Minister that the College’s registration be cancelled, because Sheikh Albaf is not a fit and proper person, both he and the College will have a right to pursue a review of that decision."
Sheikh Albaf stood himself down from his role as the school's principal in January this year.
Acting Justice Schmidt noted that Sheikh Albaf remained in that position but was no longer being paid by the college, and that a decision about his ongoing employment was paused while the legal proceedings were being heard.
She noted that NESA's investigation followed enquiries it received from the media about Sheikh Albaf after the December 2025 Bondi attack.
Her findings also noted "the Sheikh does accept that he should not have used intemperate language, as he did in some of his posts".
In a statement to the ABC, a NESA spokesperson said it acknowledged today's judgement by the NSW Supreme Court.
The director the New Madinah College board has been contacted for comment.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
NESA will revisit its determination regarding Sheikh Albaf's suitability as principal and the college's registration.
Very likely · Within weeks
Open Questions
- What will NESA's revisited determination be?
- Will Sheikh Albaf resume his role as principal?
- What will be the final outcome for New Madinah College's registration?