Public sector pensions: letters

Prof Stephen Caddick’s letter (26 May) on public sector defined-benefit (DB) pension schemes requires a response. There are five large “unfunded” schemes: NHS, teachers, civil servants, police and army. It is true that employers, and thus ultimately taxpayers, put in a fairly high employer contribution. But without a decent pension scheme, such sectors are likely to require higher levels of pay to recruit and retain staff, the cost of which would also fall on taxpayers.

The £1tn in liabilities for public DB schemes that Prof Caddick mentions is misleading, as is usually the case with any assessment of pension liabilities outside the private sector. This figure (in fact probably £1.3tn) estimates the money that the government would have to pay out to cover pensions were there no income coming from workers and employers to support them – that is, in the unlikely scenario that we suddenly ceased to have any NHS workers, teachers, soldiers and so forth, but only those in receipt of a pension in those areas.

Various other DB schemes (both public and private) are “funded” – ie supported financially by investment in the stock market.

Prof John H Arnold

King’s College, Cambridge

Public-sector workers choose their jobs based on the total package on offer. A good pension and strong benefits are what allow the state to attract people who could earn considerably more in the private sector.

It would be more honest to raise pay so that staff could fund pensions and benefits themselves. But no government will do this: it creates a problem today in exchange for solving one that lands on a future administration. Generous public-sector pensions are, in effect, a way of deferring the welfare bill.

Douglas Russell

Horningsea, Cambridgeshire

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please emailus your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.