Sanders, Warren Urge Labor Dept. to Drop Crypto 401(k) Rule
Quick Look
Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren urged the Labor Department to drop a proposal that would make it easier to offer crypto and other alternative assets in 401(k) plans, arguing it weakens fiduciary standards and could benefit Donald Trump and his family.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are urging the Labor Department to drop a proposed rule that would ease the offering of alternative assets like cryptocurrency in 401(k) plans. They argue this rule weakens fiduciary standards and could expose retirees to greater risk.
Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren urged the Labor Department to drop a proposal to make it easier to offer crypto and other alternative assets in 401(k) plans.
They argued the rule weakens fiduciary standards and could expose retirees to greater risk.
The lawmakers also said the policy could enrich President Donald Trump and his family by expanding access to crypto products tied to him and his family.
Senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) sent a blistering letter to the head of President Donald Trump’s Labor Department this week, urging the agency to reconsider a pending rule that would give fiduciaries wide cover to offer riskier assets like Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in retirement plans.
The proposed rule, floated in March, would grant fiduciaries the immunity to offer volatile and opaque assets like crypto, private equity, and private credit in 401(k) plans—so long as they stipulate that they considered various factors before offering access.
“The proposed rule is harmful to American workers and counter to statute, Congressional intent, existing regulations, and case law,” Sanders and Warren said in a 14-page letter sent Monday to Acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling. The letter was also signed by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), the top Democrat on the House Education and Labor Committee.
The lawmakers argued the new rules would presume due diligence—or prudence—on the part of fiduciaries, instead of requiring it, in violation of longstanding requirements established by the Supreme Court and the 1974 Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
They further claimed such a weakening of standards in the $10 trillion retirement plan industry could directly benefit President Donald Trump, by exposing digital assets issued by him and his family—such as World Liberty Financial’s WLFI and USD1, or the official Trump meme coin—to a much larger market.
“The change to the prudence standard described above expands opportunities for President Trump and his family to profit at the expense of taxpayers, workers and retirees,” the letter reads.
A representative for the Labor Department did not immediately respond to Decrypt’s request for comment.
Trump paved the way for the Labor Department proposal by signing an executive order last August, directing the agency to reevaluate its approach to alternative assets.
Though Sanders and Warren expressed concerns this week about weakening retirement-related fiduciary standards generally, they also underscored the particular volatility of crypto investments—and questioned the motives of Trump and other crypto entrepreneurs who have celebrated the policy shift.
“The DOL’s efforts to weaken safeguards that deter retirement saving funds from being invested into volatile and largely unregulated digital assets would jeopardize Americans’ hard earned income and benefit the digital asset industry at the cost of Americans’ retirement savings,” the lawmakers wrote.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Labor Department will face continued pressure from lawmakers and potentially other stakeholders regarding the proposed rule.
Very likely · Within weeks
The proposed rule may be revised, delayed, or dropped due to the concerns raised.
Possible · Within months
Open Questions
- Will the Labor Department reconsider or drop the proposed rule?
- What is the Labor Department's official response to the lawmakers' concerns?
- What is the potential financial impact on retirees if the rule is implemented?
- What is the extent of the potential benefit to Donald Trump and his family if the rule is implemented?






