Breaking
ITLauren Bennett, cantante di Party Rock Anthem e G.R.L., è morta a 37 anniINTLUN Agencies Appeal for $200 Million to Protect Millions from El Niño's ImpactJPNATO Summit Opens in Ankara Amid Ukraine War and US Defense StanceITSky TG24 Live In torna a Milano per una tappa di informazione e dialogoITIran, folla immensa al corteo funebre di Khamenei. Riappare AhmadinejadARماكرون يصل دمشق في زيارة تاريخية لبحث مستقبل سورياARنجاة حارس أمن فنزويلي بعد 8 أيام تحت الأنقاضINTLIndia News Roundup: CWGC Adds 9,909 Indian Soldiers, Ram Temple Trust Accepts Resignation, Film Pulled, Mob LynchingGLOBALParents See Trump Accounts as a Tool for Financial Education and SavingsAR"حزب الله" رداً على عون: اتفاق الإطار باطل وهدية مجانية لنتنياهوITLauren Bennett, cantante di Party Rock Anthem e G.R.L., è morta a 37 anniINTLUN Agencies Appeal for $200 Million to Protect Millions from El Niño's ImpactJPNATO Summit Opens in Ankara Amid Ukraine War and US Defense StanceITSky TG24 Live In torna a Milano per una tappa di informazione e dialogoITIran, folla immensa al corteo funebre di Khamenei. Riappare AhmadinejadARماكرون يصل دمشق في زيارة تاريخية لبحث مستقبل سورياARنجاة حارس أمن فنزويلي بعد 8 أيام تحت الأنقاضINTLIndia News Roundup: CWGC Adds 9,909 Indian Soldiers, Ram Temple Trust Accepts Resignation, Film Pulled, Mob LynchingGLOBALParents See Trump Accounts as a Tool for Financial Education and SavingsAR"حزب الله" رداً على عون: اتفاق الإطار باطل وهدية مجانية لنتنياهو
Newsgather
BackSenate Republicans expected to drop $1B security funding for Trump's ballroom
Senate Republicans expected to drop $1B security funding for Trump's ballroom
Developing
ABC News5/21/2026Politics4 min readUnited States

Senate Republicans expected to drop $1B security funding for Trump's ballroom

Quick Look

  • Senate Republicans are likely to abandon a $1 billion security funding proposal for President Trump's ballroom and White House complex amid internal party backlash over its cost and timing.
  • The funds were intended for the Secret Service and were part of a larger bill to restore funding for immigration enforcement.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

Senate Republicans are attempting to pass a bill to restore funding to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Border Patrol. A proposal to include $1 billion in security money for the White House complex and President Donald Trump's ballroom has faced internal party opposition.

Font size

Senate Republican leaders are expected to abandon a proposal for $1 billion in security money for the White House complex and President Donald Trump’s ballroom on Thursday after members of their own party questioned the timing and the lack of detail in the Secret Service request.

Pressured by the White House, Republicans have tried to add the money to a roughly $70 billion bill to restore funding to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Border Patrol. But the security proposal met with backlash from some GOP lawmakers who are questioning the cost and how the taxpayer dollars would be used.

The bill’s text has not yet been released, but the Senate hopes to pass it this week and send it to the House before leaving for a weeklong Memorial Day recess. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., acknowledged “ongoing vote issues” on Wednesday as leaders tired to measure Republican support, as well as “ongoing parliamentarian issues” as they try to figure out what will be allowed in the bill under the chamber’s rules.

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said Wednesday that the bill would be “back to square one” without the security money because “the votes are not there.”

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said the effort to add the security package to the bill was a “bad idea” and he does not think there is enough backing to pass it, even if the cost were reduced.

The wrangling comes as Democrats have criticized Republicans for trying to fund Trump’s ballroom when voters are concerned about basic affordability issues — and as some GOP lawmakers have grown increasingly frustrated with Trump. Several GOP senators have spoken out against the administration’s $1.776 billion settlement fund designed to compensate Trump’s allies who believe they have been persecuted, and many were upset by the president’s endorsement Tuesday of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the party primary runoff next week against Sen. John Cornyn.

“There’s always a consequence with taking on United States senators,” Thune said Wednesday. The president “obviously has his favorites and people he wants to endorse and that’s his prerogative. But what we have to deal with up here is moving the agenda, and obviously that can become slightly more complicated.”

The “anti-weaponization" fund, part of a settlement that resolves Trump’s lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns, has unexpectedly become one of the main complications in the bill. Democrats said they would force votes to block it or place restrictions on it.

Democrats have an opening because Republicans are trying to pass the immigration enforcement bill through a complicated budget process that requires a long series of amendment votes. Democrats are considering multiple amendments, potentially to block that new fund outright or to ban any payments to Trump supporters who harmed law enforcement officers in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

Those amendments, along with others, could pass as a growing number of Republicans have voiced reservations about the fund. So Republicans are now discussing their own last-minute additions to head that off, potentially placing some parameters on the settlement and who could receive compensation, according to two people with knowledge of the private discussions who requested anonymity to discuss them.

Thune — who said Tuesday that he is “not a big fan” of the settlement and doesn't see a purpose for it - said Wednesday that any new language potentially putting restrictions on the settlement is “a work in progress."

It's unclear how any Senate Republican changes would be received in the House, even as some Republicans there have also criticized the settlement.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said Wednesday that the House will pass the bill “whatever form it takes.”

As Republicans challenged the settlement and parts of his agenda, Trump unloaded on the Senate in a social media post.

He urged Republicans to fire the Senate parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, who said over the weekend that parts of the $1 billion security proposal cannot remain in the ICE and Border Patrol bill. Trump also renewed his long-standing calls for the Senate to pass the SAVE Act, a Republican bill that would require all voters to prove U.S. citizenship, and to end the Senate filibuster.

Republicans need to “get smart and tough," Trump said, or “you’ll all be looking for a job much sooner than you thought possible!”

While they have been loyal to Trump on most issues, Senate Republicans have resisted his repeated calls — even in his first term — to kill the filibuster, which triggers a 60-vote threshold in the Senate.

Hanging over the growing GOP rift is Trump’s surprise endorsement of Paxton. That intervention has Republican senators privately fuming that it could cost them their majority in November as they view the incumbent, Cornyn, as the better candidate in the November general election.

Under the Secret Service’s request, about $220 million would fund security improvements related to the ballroom. The rest would go for a new screening center for visitors, training and other security measures.

Tillis said the bill should not have included the other security improvements “because it’s just giving everybody the ‘billion-dollar ballroom.'"

Several other Republicans in the House and Senate have questioned the request, and senators left a briefing with the director of the Secret Service last week saying they needed a lot more information.

People “can’t afford groceries and gasoline and healthcare, and we’re going to do a billion dollars for a ballroom?” asked Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy, who lost reelection in his GOP primary on Saturday after Trump endorsed one of his opponents.

Left in the bill is the money for ICE and Border Patrol, which Democrats have blocked for months in protest of the Trump administration's immigration enforcement crackdown.

Democrats demanded reforms for the agencies, but negotiations with the White House yielded little progress. So Republicans are using the complicated budget maneuver called reconciliation — the same process that allowed them to pass Trump's tax and spending cuts bill last year — to fund the agencies through the end of Trump's term with a simple majority and no Democratic votes.

Still, passage requires signoff from the parliamentarian and unity from Republicans.

“We're working on it,” Thune said as he left the Capitol on Wednesday evening.

___

What to Watch

AI outlook — possibilities, not facts

  • Senate Republicans will abandon the $1 billion security funding proposal for Trump's ballroom.

    Very likely · Within days

  • Democrats will attempt to block or place restrictions on the 'anti-weaponization' fund through amendments.

    Very likely · Within days

  • The immigration enforcement bill will eventually pass, but potentially in a modified form.

    Likely · Within weeks

Open Questions

  • How will the $1 billion in security funding be reallocated or if it will be dropped entirely?
  • What specific parameters will be placed on the settlement fund if Republicans attempt to modify it?
  • How will the House of Representatives react to any changes made to the bill in the Senate?
  • Will the parliamentarian allow the proposed amendments or the reconciliation process to proceed?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by ABC News.

Related Stories

The Lavender Panthers: A Predecessor to Queer Mutual Aid Movements
Politics·3h ago

The Lavender Panthers: A Predecessor to Queer Mutual Aid Movements

In 1973, gay preacher Ray Broshears founded the Lavender Panthers in San Francisco to protect the LGBTQ+ community in the Tenderloin from violence. Despite his controversial methods, the group exemplified queer mutual aid in a homophobic society and predated later movements. Broshears actively sought publicity, which helped preserve information about the group, unlike many other discreet queer defense organizations.

NPR News
More on this topictrump