Standard Chartered Analyst: Strategy's Bitcoin Sale a Turning Point for Ethereum
Quick Look
Standard Chartered's Geoff Kendrick believes Strategy's $2.5M Bitcoin sale is a turning point for Ethereum, noting Ethereum's outperformance and its potential to benefit from stablecoins and tokenization.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Standard Chartered's Geoff Kendrick argues that Strategy's $2.5 million Bitcoin liquidation marked a turning point for Ethereum, leading to one of Ethereum's largest daily outperformance spikes since 2024. Kendrick believes Ethereum's current price is disconnected from its thriving network metrics.
Standard Chartered's Geoff Kendrick argues that Strategy's $2.5 million Bitcoin liquidation marked a turning point for Ethereum.
As Bitcoin's price dropped, Ethereum registered one of Ethereum's largest daily outperformance spikes since 2024.
Kendrick believes that Ethereum's current price is deeply disconnected from thriving network metrics.
When Strategy disclosed on Monday that it had sold Bitcoin, the move marked a counterintuitive turning point for Ethereum, according to Standard Chartered’s Geoff Kendrick.
Although the second-largest digital asset by market cap has lagged its oldest peer for months, investors’ reaction to Strategy’s liquidation created favorable conditions for Ethereum that could persist, the bank’s head of digital asset research shared in a Tuesday note.
After Strategy shaved its stockpile by $2.5 million, Ethereum notched one of its largest price moves against Bitcoin in years, Kendrick wrote. Since the start of 2024, Ethereum has registered better daily gains relative to Bitcoin, when it falls, just 23 times, he added.
By year’s end, Kendrick argues that Bitcoin’s dominance over Ethereum will weaken to levels not seen since September, or 0.04. Assuming that the larger asset remains unchanged, Bitcoin would be worth $67,300, while Ethereum would have risen 41% to roughly $2,700 from $1,900.
Kendrick noted that Strategy’s sale highlighted a distinct business model among Ethereum-buying and Bitcoin-buying firms. Companies can stake Ethereum to earn rewards by participating in the process of validating transactions, effectively generating revenue. Compared to Bitcoin-buying firms, that reduces the need for any sales, Kendrick wrote.
Last week, the investment bank projected a year-end target of $4,000 for Ethereum, contending that the digital asset’s price doesn’t reflect improving internal metrics. Kendrick compared the disparity to Amazon’s tumble amid a catastrophic end to the dot-com bubble.
Kendrick’s analysis specifically looked at the “ETH/BTC” ratio. The ratio peaked last year in August at 0.042 as Ethereum hit an all-time high of nearly $5,000, but historically, the asset created around the concept of smart contracts—which hold the code to power everything from tokens to decentralized apps and NFT projects—has trended relatively lower since 2022.
Kendrick wrote, however, that Ethereum is poised to benefit from Wall Street’s growing interest in stablecoins as modern money and tokenization as new market plumbing.
Ethereum’s grip in those sectors had been recognized by asset managers such as BlackRock. Kendrick has penciled in $40,000 for Ethereum by the end of the decade, while he expects Bitcoin to rise to $500,000 over the same period.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Bitcoin's dominance over Ethereum will weaken to levels not seen since September.
Likely · Within months
Bitcoin will be worth $67,300 by year-end, assuming it remains unchanged.
Possible · Within months
Ethereum will rise 41% to roughly $2,700 from $1,900 by year-end.
Possible · Within months
Ethereum price target of $4,000 by year-end.
Likely · Within months
Open Questions
- What are the specific business models of other Ethereum-buying and Bitcoin-buying firms?
- What is the current status of the ETH/BTC ratio?
- What are the specific internal metrics that indicate Ethereum's improvement?
- What is the projected timeline for Wall Street's growing interest in stablecoins and tokenization?






