Starmer says 'vast majority' of Labour still supports him amid Mandelson controversy
PM defends his leadership as pressure mounts over appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington despite vetting officials recommending denial of security clearance
Quick Look
- Keir Starmer has defended his leadership amid controversy over appointing Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington, stating the vast majority of Labour MPs support him.
- The Prime Minister maintains Labour can still win the next general election despite calls for his resignation.
- His former chief of staff Morgan McSweeney is expected to appear before the foreign affairs committee on Tuesday over the Mandelson appointment, while former Foreign Office official Olly Robbins testified that No 10 created pressure making it almost impossible to deny clearance.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The controversy centers on Starmer's decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington despite vetting officials recommending denial of security clearance. This has led to calls for Starmer's resignation from within his own party and a parliamentary investigation.
Good morning and welcome to today's live coverage of UK politics. Despite several calls for his resignation from within his own party, Keir Starmer told the Sunday Times that the "vast majority" of the Labour party are supportive of his leadership. "In politics, you get this sort of thing all of the time," he said. "There is always talk. What you never hear from are all the people who are supportive, loyal and just want to get on with the job. And that is the vast majority of people in the parliamentary Labour party. "They're pleased to be in power. They've waited a long time to be in power. And they just want to get on with their job. They don't make a lot of noise about it. They don't talk to journalists about it. It's really important that is reflected in these debates." As the pressure continues to build over his decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington despite vetting officials recommending that he be denied security clearance, Starmer maintained that he believed Labour can still win the next general election under his leadership. "We didn't wait 14 years to get elected, we didn't change the Labour party, we didn't do all that it entailed to win the election and the mandate for change, not to deliver on it," he said. On Tuesday, Starmer's former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, is expected to appear before the foreign affairs committee to be questioned over Mandelson's appointment. McSweeney resigned in February over his role in the hiring of Mandelson. Last week, Olly Robbins, the former top official at the Foreign Office, told the committee that No 10 had created an "atmosphere of pressure" that made it almost impossible to deny clearance for Mandelson. Stay tuned for more.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Morgan McSweeney will face tough questioning at foreign affairs committee on Tuesday
Very likely · Within days
Pressure on Starmer will continue until next general election
Likely · Within months
Open Questions
- What specific information did vetting officials have about Mandelson?
- Did Starmer directly override security advice?
- How many Labour MPs actually support vs oppose Starmer?






