
The reasons for the ruling that made the sentences for the 2009 train disaster final have been filed
AI-generated summary
The Viareggio train disaster of June 2009 caused the death of 32 people and injured 100 others. The Supreme Court ruling of 25 June made the sentences for the defendants definitive.
"All the defendants" involved in the Viareggio massacre - which in June 2009 caused the death of 32 people and the wounding of another 100 - "each with a different causal contribution and each with a different degree of guilt, contributed to the occurrence of exceptionally serious events". The judges of the Court of Cassation wrote this in the reasons with which on 25 June they made the five-year sentences definitive for the former CEO of FS and RFI Mauro Moretti and for the other 10 defendants.
In reference to the sentence imposed on the manager - who after the sentence went to prison -, the stoats write that "it is neither illegal nor illegitimate as the principle of the prohibition of reformatio in peius is respected" which indicates the "pejorative" modification of a first degree sentence by the appellate judge. "But there is more: the sentence imposed - write the supreme judges - for each of the satellite crimes, compared to that referred to in the first appeal sentence, is reduced by more than a ninth, hence it must be concluded that, in essence, also with respect to the crimes of injuries and negligent fire, the judges, in determining the sentence, took into account the recognition of the generic mitigating circumstances" In the 54-page document the Fourth Criminal Section states that the judges of second instance have "valued...not the gravity of the individual conduct, but rather the 'extraordinary gravity' of the consequences resulting from those conduct".
The reasons cite the first appeal process and state how the defendants "made imprudent choices, limiting or excluding investments in a sector characterized by particular danger, despite being aware, given their experience and competence, of the conflict of such choices with safety duties and of the greater risk that they brought to the entire rail transport system, but in the same time period they increased or did not limit the protections in the passenger transport sector and improved the service for users overall". In the June ruling, the Supreme Judges essentially accepted the request of the General Prosecutor's Office, which had requested the rejection of all the appeals presented by the defendants and the full confirmation of the sentences established in the appeal judgment held in Florence.

On 10 September 2026, the defense presented a 66-page complaint to the Court of Appeal against the decision of the Juvenile Court of L'Aquila on the staged reunification of three children removed in November 2025 from a farmhouse in Palmoli, requesting the cancellation of the technical consultancy, the immediate return to the family and the admission of the home schooling project supported by the Municipality.

The draft decree on AI in policing raises regulatory concerns. Although it requires the deletion of biometric data acquired without authorization, the exception for data collected under 'other legal basis' creates a potential regulatory gap.

Valter Lavitola will be via video link from Rebibbia prison for the review hearing on the attack on the journalist Sigfrido Ranucci. The defense points to the ineffectiveness of the measure, the mafia method and territorial jurisdiction.

The parents of the three children removed from the family and placed in a family home for ten months denounce the failure to start the gradual return process ordered by the Juvenile Court of L'Aquila and announce an appeal, arguing that the immediate return home is necessary for the health of their children and asking for recognition of the right to home education.

Catherine and Nathan, parents of three children removed from the family home for ten months, denounce in a video provided by the lawyer Simone Pillon the provision that prevents reunification, stating that their children's health and education are at risk and announcing their intention to appeal against the decision of the Juvenile Court of L'Aquila.

Lawyer Simone Pillon denounces delays on the part of the foster social service in implementing the decree of the Juvenile Court of L'Aquila, which provides for the gradual return to Palmoli of the three children of the Anglo-Australian couple.