Breaking
CNShein Gets China's Go-Ahead for Hong Kong IPODEAuffahrunfall auf A5 bei Karlsruhe: LKW-Fahrer schwer verletztTRRyanair uçağı motor arızası nedeniyle Selanik'e acil iniş yaptıBRTufão Bavi avança em direção a Taiwan após deixar 15 mortos nas FilipinasKR광주무안고속도로서 차량 10대 연쇄 추돌…장성터널서 화물차 화재DEBundesrat beschließt Entschließungsantrag zur Schulpflicht – Auch Abgrenzung zur AfDTRGayrettepe Yangını Davası: Bilirkişi Raporu BekleniyorKR강릉영동대, 외국인 학생 376명 부적절 합격 처리…교육부, 교직원 수사 의뢰RUРоссийские дроны пресекли попытку контратаки ВСУ с помощью роботов в Запорожской областиCN教育部提醒:警惕暑期“研学”“夏令营”商业陷阱CNShein Gets China's Go-Ahead for Hong Kong IPODEAuffahrunfall auf A5 bei Karlsruhe: LKW-Fahrer schwer verletztTRRyanair uçağı motor arızası nedeniyle Selanik'e acil iniş yaptıBRTufão Bavi avança em direção a Taiwan após deixar 15 mortos nas FilipinasKR광주무안고속도로서 차량 10대 연쇄 추돌…장성터널서 화물차 화재DEBundesrat beschließt Entschließungsantrag zur Schulpflicht – Auch Abgrenzung zur AfDTRGayrettepe Yangını Davası: Bilirkişi Raporu BekleniyorKR강릉영동대, 외국인 학생 376명 부적절 합격 처리…교육부, 교직원 수사 의뢰RUРоссийские дроны пресекли попытку контратаки ВСУ с помощью роботов в Запорожской областиCN教育部提醒:警惕暑期“研学”“夏令营”商业陷阱
Newsgather
BackSupreme Court pulls up Finance Ministry over Yes Bank AT-1 bond write-off
Supreme Court pulls up Finance Ministry over Yes Bank AT-1 bond write-off
Urgent
Economic Times5/20/2026Law2 min readIndia

Supreme Court pulls up Finance Ministry over Yes Bank AT-1 bond write-off

Quick Look

  • The Supreme Court has demanded records from the Finance Ministry regarding the 2023 write-off of Yes Bank's Rs 8,415 crore AT-1 bonds.
  • The court questioned the validity of the Cabinet decision and asked for meeting minutes and quorum details by 3 PM.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

The Supreme Court is reviewing a decision by the Finance Ministry to write off Rs 8,415 crore of Yes Bank's AT-1 bonds in 2023. This write-off was previously quashed by the Bombay High Court, leading to an appeal by the bank, RBI, and the ministry. The court is now questioning the procedural validity of the Cabinet's decision.

Font size

The Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Finance Ministry over the 2023 write-off of Yes Bank’s Rs 8,415 crore AT-1 bonds and asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to produce Cabinet meeting records, quorum details and related documents by 3 PM.

Coming down heavily on the Finance Ministry, the Supreme Court on Wednesday asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to produce the Cabinet resolution, minutes of the meeting and related documents on the basis of which the decision to write off additional tier-1 (AT-1) bonds worth Rs 8,415 crore was taken in 2023.

Mehta has to produce the minutes of the Cabinet decision by 3 PM today.

A bench led by Justice Dipankar Datta asked Mehta, appearing for the Finance Ministry, to also submit “full disclosure of rules of the Cabinet meeting”, details of the quorum and the names of members present at the meeting that took the decision.

“Satisfy our conscience. Tell us if there was a proper Cabinet meeting. If not, then you will invite an order from us. We are keeping it open… you are the second senior-most law officer of the court, you will advise your client properly whether you would like an order from the court or would like to withdraw your appeal,” Justice Datta told Mehta.

The solicitor general suggested that he first produce the documents and then let the court take a view.

“Is there any immunity that the court cannot see the file?” the judge asked the solicitor general, who argued that the Department of Financial Services under the Finance Ministry had written to the RBI about the Cabinet decision.

Yes Bank, RBI and the Finance Ministry had moved the Supreme Court in 2023 against the Bombay High Court’s January 2023 order quashing the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) and Yes Bank’s decision to write off additional tier-1 (AT-1) bonds worth Rs 8,415 crore.

Institutional investors such as mutual funds, including Reliance Nippon, and bondholders, including financial institutions and retail investors, had invested as much as Rs 8,415 crore in Yes Bank’s AT-1 bonds. Subsequently, the bank’s retail AT-1 bondholders moved the high court challenging the decision and seeking to reclaim their money. The high court ruled in their favour.

What to Watch

AI outlook — possibilities, not facts

  • The Finance Ministry will produce the requested Cabinet meeting records and related documents.

    Very likely · Within hours

  • The Supreme Court will issue an order regarding the validity of the AT-1 bond write-off decision.

    Likely · Within days

Open Questions

  • What were the specific rules and quorum details of the Cabinet meeting where the write-off decision was made?
  • Why did the Finance Ministry proceed with the write-off despite the Bombay High Court's ruling?
  • What is the legal basis for the Finance Ministry's claim of immunity from court scrutiny of Cabinet files?
  • What will be the court's order if the Finance Ministry fails to satisfy its conscience regarding the meeting's validity?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by Economic Times.

Related Stories

More on this topicSupreme Court