U.S. Cities Restrict AI Data Center Development Over Water and Energy Concerns
Quick Look
Cities across the U.S., including Austin, San Marcos, Durham, Cave City, and Jersey City, are enacting restrictions on AI data center development due to concerns over water consumption, electricity demand, and land use, following a Ceres study showing power plants serving data centers withdraw 3.4 trillion gallons of freshwater annually.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The rapid expansion of AI data centers has increased demand for electricity and water, particularly for cooling power plants that support these facilities. Communities are growing concerned about resource strain and environmental impacts.
Cities across the U.S. are restricting AI data center development as communities raise concerns about water supplies, electricity costs, and land use.
Austin, Texas, became the latest city to act Thursday, when its City Council voted unanimously to begin drafting rules that could restrict or exclude new data centers.
The vote followed a Ceres study examining water withdrawn by power plants serving data centers in Virginia, Texas, California, Illinois, Georgia, Ohio, and Arizona. The seven states host about half of the nation’s data centers.
Those plants withdraw about 3.4 trillion gallons of freshwater annually, equal to 10.4 million acre-feet. That exceeds California’s average annual urban water demand of 8 million acre-feet and is about 12 times the combined annual water use of Los Angeles, Phoenix, and Washington, D.C., according to the study.
“Overall, we saw that 66% of the power plants that use water in those states were exposed to medium to high water stress,” Kristen James, senior program director for water at Ceres, said in a statement.
The study counts water that power plants draw from rivers, reservoirs, and other sources to generate electricity for data centers. Some is returned, while water consumed through evaporation or other processes is not immediately available for reuse.
Austin officials will now draft Land Development Code changes defining data centers and establishing safeguards. Council members are expected to consider the first phase of the ordinance in December.
The nonprofit consumer advocacy group Public Citizen said the vote contrasted with what it described as inadequate action from Texas state leaders.
“While Gov. Greg Abbott can only offer performative and mostly voluntary measures, local leaders are acting to protect the community from large-scale data centers,” Kaiba White, an Austin-based climate policy specialist for Public Citizen, said in a statement.
Austin follows a number of other American cities that have taken measures to prevent data centers used for AI computing and other technologies from being built within their borders.
In June, San Marcos, Texas, barred data centers under its zoning laws, while Durham, North Carolina, and Cave City, Kentucky, imposed moratoriums. Earlier this month, Jersey City, New Jersey, banned data centers as the primary use of industrial property. This rise in opposition to AI data centers has also led to arrests, with at least 37 Americans detained during AI data center protests in 2026 so far.
The push has also expanded beyond local ordinances and has reached state legislatures.
In April, Maine lawmakers approved what would have been the country’s first statewide moratorium on large data centers. Gov. Janet Mills later vetoed the bill because it did not exempt a proposed project in Jay, though she subsequently created an advisory council to study data center policy. Earlier this month, Pennsylvania imposed new requirements for large data centers, including annual water and energy reporting.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Austin will finalize and implement its data center ordinance by early 2027.
Likely · Within months
More U.S. cities will adopt zoning restrictions or moratoriums on data centers in 2026-2027.
Likely · Within months
Open Questions
- What specific restrictions will Austin's Land Development Code changes include?
- How will data center operators respond to local ordinances?
- Will more states follow Pennsylvania's reporting requirements or Maine's advisory council model?
- What is the projected growth of AI data center water and energy use over the next five years?







