A Suprema Corte dos EUA, com maioria conservadora formada por Trump, ampliou poderes presidenciais e permitiu restrições a atletas transgênero, mas barrou proposta ousada de restringir cidadania por "direito de nascimento".
A Suprema Corte dos EUA decidiu sobre sete casos importantes para o governo Trump, resultando em três vitórias e quatro derrotas para o presidente. As decisões abrangem cidadania, demissões, votos por correio e direitos de atletas transgênero.
A Suprema Corte dos EUA, por 6 votos a 3, confirmou a cidadania por nascimento, reafirmando o "jus soli" da 14ª Emenda. A decisão rejeita as restrições de Donald Trump, que visavam limitar a cidadania a filhos de imigrantes ou turistas.
La Cour suprême des États-Unis a rejeté la demande de l'administration Trump de révoquer Lisa Cook, gouverneure de la Réserve fédérale. Par cinq voix contre quatre, les juges ont maintenu Cook à son poste, renforçant l'indépendance de la banque centrale.
The US Supreme Court issued several key rulings concerning Donald Trump, including expanding presidential firing power over regulators, preserving the Federal Reserve's independence, upholding mail-in voting rules, and allowing a sexual abuse judgment against him to stand.
The Supreme Court in Trump v Slaughter overturned a 91-year precedent, allowing the president to fire independent agency heads at will, except for Federal Reserve board members. This ruling significantly expands presidential authority and is seen as a blow to congressional power and the administrative state.
The US Supreme Court expanded presidential power by ruling that presidents can fire heads of independent federal agencies at will. However, it protected Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, ruling she could only be removed 'for cause.' The court also declined to hear Trump's appeal in the E. Jean Carroll defamation case.
Tòa án Tối cao Mỹ phán quyết Tổng thống Donald Trump không có quyền sa thải thành viên Hội đồng Thống đốc Fed Lisa Cook, cho phép bà tiếp tục giữ chức vụ trong khi theo đuổi vụ kiện bác bỏ cáo buộc gian lận thế chấp của chính quyền Trump. Phán quyết nhấn mạnh Fed cần độc lập, không chịu can thiệp chính trị.
The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that President Trump lacks immediate authority to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook over alleged mortgage fraud, emphasizing due process requirements but leaving open future dismissal possibilities.
The US Supreme Court ruled that the president can fire leaders of independent agencies, overturning 90 years of precedent. Donald Trump celebrated the decision, while labor and consumer advocacy groups, along with legal experts, criticized it as a threat to democracy and government functioning.
The Supreme Court has expanded presidential power, allowing the US President to fire heads of independent federal agencies at will, overturning a 91-year-old precedent. An exception was made for Federal Reserve governors, with Lisa Cook allowed to remain in her post while fighting dismissal.
The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 against President Trump's attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, protecting the central bank's independence and requiring 'cause' for removal.
ABD Yüksek Mahkemesi, Trump'ın Fed Yönetim Kurulu Üyesi Cook'u 'haklı neden' gerekçesiyle görevden alma girişimini 4'e karşı 5 oyla reddetti. Mahkeme, Cook'a yasaların gerektirdiği bildirim ve savunma hakkının tanınmadığına karar verdi.
Yüksek Mahkeme, Trump'ın Fed Yönetim Kurulu Üyesi Cook'u görevden alma talebini usule ilişkin gerekçelerle reddetti. Karar, Fed'in bağımsızlığına vurgu yaparken, Cook'un savunma hakkının ihlal edildiğini belirtti.
US-Präsident Donald Trump hat im Streit mit der Notenbank eine Niederlage vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof erlitten, der seinen Antrag auf Entlassung von Vorständin Lisa Cook abwies. Cook kann vorerst im Amt bleiben, da die Richter die Unabhängigkeit der Zentralbank betonten und Cook keine ausreichende Gelegenheit zur Stellungnahme erhielt.
US-Präsident Trump hat vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof eine Niederlage erlitten, da sein Antrag zur Entlassung von Notenbank-Vorständin Lisa Cook abgewiesen wurde. Cook bleibt vorerst im Amt, das Verfahren läuft in unterer Instanz weiter. Die Richter betonten die Unabhängigkeit der Zentralbank.
Der Oberste Gerichtshof der USA hat einen Antrag von US-Präsident Trump abgewiesen, wodurch Notenbank-Vorständin Lisa Cook vorerst im Amt bleibt. Das Gericht betonte die Unabhängigkeit der Zentralbank und die fehlende Gelegenheit Cooks zur Stellungnahme.
Donald Trump dichiara che continuerà a opporsi alla permanenza di Lisa Cook nel board della Fed, nonostante la Corte Suprema abbia respinto i suoi tentativi di licenziarla per motivi procedurali.
La Corte Suprema ha confermato la permanenza di Lisa Cook nel consiglio della Federal Reserve, respingendo i tentativi di Donald Trump di licenziarla. La governatrice ha sottolineato l'importanza dell'indipendenza della Fed.
Der US-Oberste Gerichtshof hat den Antrag der Trump-Regierung, die Entscheidung einer unteren Instanz zur Entlassung von Fed-Direktorin Cook aufzuheben, abgelehnt. Damit bleibt Cook im Amt und die Unabhängigkeit der Zentralbank ist gewahrt.
Das Oberste US-Gericht hat Trumps Antrag abgelehnt, Fed-Gouverneurin Lael Brainard Cook zu entlassen. Dies schützt die Unabhängigkeit der Notenbank und verhindert Trumps sofortige Entlassung Cooks während ihres laufenden Rechtsstreits.
The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that President Trump cannot immediately fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, limiting presidential authority over the central bank, while she fights unproven mortgage fraud allegations.
Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook faced over $1.3 million in legal and security costs due to attacks from the Trump administration, including accusations of mortgage fraud by Bill Pulte. Cook denied the claims, asserting political motivation. A Supreme Court case stemming from her firing by Trump could impact the Fed's independence.
Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook incurred over $1.3 million in legal and security expenses following President Trump's attempt to fire her, with payments made by nonprofit organizations Democracy Defenders Fund and Contina Impact.
