عاجل
ESMarlaska: "No podemos ser optimistas" ante los incendios de Ávila y MadridESEspaña declara emergencia nacional por incendios en Madrid y Castilla y LeónESIncendio en Ávila: 1.500 desalojados y confinamientos por avance virulento del fuegoESIrene Rosales rompe su silencio tras el segundo ictus de Kiko RiveraESIncendio en granja avícola de Fortín de las Flores calcinó 30 mil pollosESRechazo a la financiación de fármacos para el Alzheimer genera frustración en pacientes y familiasESZapatero rompe su silencio sobre el caso Plus Ultra y las joyas, dejando 'decepción' en el PSOEESDiferencias entre agotamiento por calor y golpe de calor: síntomas y cómo actuarESUn mes después de los terremotos en Venezuela: miles de desaparecidos y críticas a la respuesta estatalESUn modelo de IA de OpenAI hackea a otra empresa de forma autónomaESMarlaska: "No podemos ser optimistas" ante los incendios de Ávila y MadridESEspaña declara emergencia nacional por incendios en Madrid y Castilla y LeónESIncendio en Ávila: 1.500 desalojados y confinamientos por avance virulento del fuegoESIrene Rosales rompe su silencio tras el segundo ictus de Kiko RiveraESIncendio en granja avícola de Fortín de las Flores calcinó 30 mil pollosESRechazo a la financiación de fármacos para el Alzheimer genera frustración en pacientes y familiasESZapatero rompe su silencio sobre el caso Plus Ultra y las joyas, dejando 'decepción' en el PSOEESDiferencias entre agotamiento por calor y golpe de calor: síntomas y cómo actuarESUn mes después de los terremotos en Venezuela: miles de desaparecidos y críticas a la respuesta estatalESUn modelo de IA de OpenAI hackea a otra empresa de forma autónoma
Newsgather
رجوعJustice Elena Kagan: Supreme Court Not a 'Puppet' for Trump
Justice Elena Kagan: Supreme Court Not a 'Puppet' for Trump
سياسة
ABC Newsقبل 4 ساعاتسياسة4 د قراءةUnited States

Justice Elena Kagan: Supreme Court Not a 'Puppet' for Trump

نظرة سريعة

  • Justice Elena Kagan stated the conservative Supreme Court is not a "puppet" for President Trump, citing rulings against his tariffs and birthright citizenship efforts, despite siding with his administration in many cases.
  • She also discussed the court's ethics code and Trump's attendance at oral arguments.

ملخص مُنشأ بالذكاء الاصطناعي

لماذا يهم

Justice Elena Kagan addressed lawyers and judges from the 9th U.S. Circuit, asserting that the deeply conservative Supreme Court has, at significant times, checked the executive branch, specifically citing rulings against former President Trump's tariffs and birthright citizenship efforts. She also discussed the court's first code of ethics and Trump's unprecedented attendance at oral arguments.

حجم الخط

BELLEVUE, Wash. -- The U.S. Supreme Court may be deeply conservative, but it is not simply a rubber stamp for President Donald Trump, Justice Elena Kagan said Thursday.

Kagan, one of the court's three liberal justices, told an audience of lawyers and judges from the 9th U.S. Circuit in Bellevue, Washington, that at significant times, on some big issues, “the court has checked the executive branch.”

The court has sided with the Trump administration in the vast majority of cases to come before it so far, including largely upholding his immigration crackdown and expanding Trump's authority over federal regulatory agencies. But Kagan pointed to key rulings where the president did not get what he sought, such as decisions rejecting Trump's sweeping tariffs and his efforts to strip birthright citizenship from the children of people who are in the U.S. illegally.

“Is this court very conservative? Does it do a bunch of things that are out of the playbook of the conservative legal movement that I think are deeply wrong? You know, yes,” Kagan said. “But is this court the kind of puppet for the current administration? I think definitely not.”

Polling has found public trust in the Supreme Court at historic lows in recent years, and a number of critics of the current court have suggested political motivations on the part of its justices. Trump has personally assailed justices who rule against him in stark terms. One liberal justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, said in May after the court struck down a majority-Black district in Louisiana and weakened the Voting Rights Act that the institution risked being seen as political.

Chief Justice John Roberts, who was among those joining the court's liberal justices on some key cases such as birthright citizenship and tariffs, has fought back against the perception that the justices are “political actors,” calling it a misunderstanding.

Kagan, often seen as a bridge-builder, echoed that approach in her comments Thursday, which followed her testimony before Congress alongside conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett last week on security threats and other issues facing the court.

Kagan reiterated her support for appointing a committee of retired judges to enforce the Supreme Court's first code of ethics, adopted in 2023 during a storm of criticism over undisclosed trips and gifts from wealthy benefactors to some justices. While the justices are taking the ethics code seriously, opinions differ on the court about how or whether it might be enforced, and no conclusions have been reached, she said.

Kagan also offered a view from the bench of a historic moment from the court's past term, when Trump himself took a front-row seat for arguments over his birthright citizenship order. He was the first sitting president to attend oral arguments.

It was largely a “non-event” for the justices, Kagan said. Trump took a seat off to the side, in an area relatively far from the bench typically reserved for members of Congress, and the court made no announcement of his presence. Many in the audience couldn't see him, she noted.

“He was just like a person who came in and sat down and then had to listen to an argument,” Kagan said.

The president remained for about half of the lengthy arguments, leaving when the other side began making its case.

“You really did kind of think, he probably has other things to do, you know?” said Kagan, who served as solicitor general during the Obama administration. “I was sort of thinking, I worked for a president, and when a president walks into the room, you get the whole ‘Hail to the Chief' stuff. And there was like none of that. And so, I don’t know, I think he probably won’t come back.”

أسئلة مفتوحة

  • How will the Supreme Court's ethics code be enforced?
  • Will public trust in the Supreme Court improve?
  • Will President Trump attend future oral arguments?

مواضيع ذات صلة

This article was originally published by ABC News.

أخبار ذات صلة

FCC Chair Brendan Carr Faces Scrutiny Over Multiple Policy Decisions and Actions
سياسة·قبل 7 ساعات

FCC Chair Brendan Carr Faces Scrutiny Over Multiple Policy Decisions and Actions

FCC Chair Brendan Carr is at the center of several controversies, including a vote to end the national broadcast ownership cap, introducing the JAWBONE Act for suing over coerced content removal, facing a court petition to repeal the News Distortion Policy, scrutinizing children's TV content on gender identity, clarifying comments on Iran war coverage, facing Senate testimony scrutiny, investigating a BBC documentary, proposing changes to broadband billing transparency, and being publicly criticized by Jimmy Kimmel.

The Verge
5 د قراءة
المزيد حول هذا الموضوعsupreme court