
AI-generated summary
In a situation where Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh refrained from signaling the path of interest rates, New York Fed President John Williams and Vice Chairman Philip Jefferson made successive remarks, sparking market interpretation of the policy direction.
(New York = Yonhap News) Correspondent Kim Yeon-sook = With the head of the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) refraining from giving signals about the future interest rate path, a series of recent remarks by high-ranking officials of the Federal Reserve are actually acting like 'policy signals' in the market.
In line with Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Worthy's communication policy of avoiding preemptive guidance (forward guidance) and leaving judgment to economic indicators, attention is focused on the background to the Fed leadership's remarks that ultimately moved market expectations.
On the 29th of last month (local time), New York Federal Reserve Bank President John Williams said that it may be appropriate to raise the benchmark interest rate once more at the end of this year, but that there is no need to rush.
Next, Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Philip Jefferson also said that data trends and forecasts must be carefully reviewed when adjusting policy on the 1st of this month, and that it may take more time to make a decision.
Such remarks were interpreted as suggesting ‘adjusting the pace’ of raising the base interest rate. The market lowered expectations for a Federal Reserve interest rate hike in October.
Even before Governor Williams' remarks, the probability of an interest rate increase in October reflected by the market was about 70%. Afterwards, expectations of an interest rate hike quickly receded as price indicators became weaker than expected.
This is why the market paid attention to the remarks of the two figures, made two days apart, in a situation where Chairman Wash's policy signal was lacking.
The president of the New York Fed not only has a permanent vote on policy decisions, but also customarily serves as vice chairman of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). This position has been considered a member of the Fed's 'troika' that leads monetary policy along with the Fed Chairman and Vice Chairman.
In the past, remarks by the Fed Vice Chairman or the President of the New York Fed were taken as a signal conveying the views of the entire Fed Troika.
Market experts see their speech as a clear attempt to temper market expectations and indicate that the Fed is taking a more cautious approach to its future policy actions.
According to Bloomberg News on the 2nd, Goldman Sachs economists synthesized their remarks and solidified their judgment that an interest rate hike in October would be difficult.
Evercore ISI's Chief Economist Krishna Guha also evaluated the two people's remarks as an "authoritative" message.
Michael Feroli, chief economist at JPMorgan Chase, analyzed that the two men's speeches were an attempt to manage market expectations.
“Both speeches convey the message that there is no need to keep raising interest rates at every meeting, and that the interval between increases can now be adjusted somewhat,” he explained.
However, there are differences in interpretation as to whether their remarks can be seen as typical preemptive guidance.
Ellen Meade, an economics professor at Duke University, explained that there is a subtle but clear difference between preemptive guidance that makes an interest rate change a fait accompli and preemptive guidance that adjusts the speed by saying that a decision will be made based on sufficient data.
There is no evidence that Vice Chairman Jefferson and President Williams coordinated the content of their speeches with each other or Chairman Wash in advance.
It has been revealed once again that even while Chairman Wash is refraining from signaling the future interest rate path, the market is somehow trying to read the direction of policy.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The judgment that an interest rate hike in October will be difficult will continue.
Likely · Within weeks
The Federal Reserve will take a more data-dependent approach to future policy decisions
Possible · Within months

Siheung City has revised all of its investment attraction promotion ordinances and will provide subsidies of up to 600 million won to companies opening or expanding within the jurisdiction. Companies that invest more than 5 billion won in new or expanded headquarters or research facilities or hire more than 30 new employees are designated as investment attraction companies, and various incentives such as building rent support, job creation subsidies, and infrastructure support are provided. The ordinance revision aims to attract investment in high-tech industries and expand quality jobs.

Hyundai Department Store announced that it will donate 300 million won in donations raised from customer campaigns and event profits to Habitat Korea to help victims of the Nepal floods recover from their daily lives and rebuild residential facilities.

The domestic pet food market has grown to 2.5 trillion won, but the government is unable to determine the share of imported products, and the export support budget has increased fivefold in two years, but export amounts remain at the same level. Last year, pet food imports were 2.1 times the export amount, resulting in a trade deficit of $182 million, which has been the 11th consecutive year of deficit since 2015.

Global industry executives at a Seoul roundtable warned that South Korea's proposed bank-led model for won-backed stablecoins could reduce incentives for fintechs to innovate, as banks may lack motivation to build alternatives that compete with their existing payment infrastructure, while discussing cross-border use cases and risks to bank funding.

In response to online suspicions that home appliances sold at department stores, mass retailers such as Hi-Mart, Electronic Land, and online differ depending on the distribution channel, the home appliance industry explained that if the model name is the same, the parts, design, and performance are all the same, and that the difference in model name mainly occurs in design elements such as color and material, and is not a difference in performance.

YLab CEO Kang Cheol-gu emphasized the long-term value and franchise strategy of webtoon IP, citing successful cases of adapting original webtoons into dramas and movies. Based on the global success of 'True Education', 'Good Competition', and 'Study Group', and the world view connection structure, they are working on collaboration with Chinese and Japanese companies and AI video creation projects, and announced that they are aiming for sustainable IP growth based on fandom.