
Lin Yuexue, a young lawyer surnamed Guo involved in the case, questioned the donation of the victim's family in court and criticized Li Huixuan as "a shameful lawyer", triggering netizens' meat search and one-star negative reviews; Li Huixuan called for an end to online attacks and a return to rational discussion.
AI-generated summary
A neck-slitting murder of a junior high school student occurred in New Taipei City on Christmas Day in 2023. Two teenagers were sentenced to 12 years and 11 years in prison respectively. The civil compensation part is currently being heard by the High Court.
Li Huixuan called on netizens to stop attacking lawyer Lin. (Photo by reporter Weng Jingyou)
The civil part of the New Taipei Junior High School student's neck-slicing case is still under trial. During the recent court session, Lin Yuexue, the appointed lawyer of the boy named Guo involved in the case, raised a number of questions against the victim's family. He also attacked the Yang family's appointed lawyer Li Huixuan for the second time as "the shame of a legal person." When the relevant news came out, netizens criticized him. His law firm even had negative reviews on Google and changed its name. In response, Li Huixuan today called on netizens to stop relevant behaviors and encouraged everyone to return to rational discussions on the law.
This case originated from the neck-sliding murder case of a junior high school student in New Taipei City that occurred on Christmas Day in 2023. A boy named Guo stabbed to death a student named Yang from the same school. The girl named Lin was found to be involved in abetting the crime. The two were sentenced to 12 and 11 years in prison respectively.
In the civil compensation part, the parents and sister of the young boy surnamed Yang requested compensation for damages such as alimony and spiritual comfort. Among them, Yang's father asked for more than 7.23 million yuan, Yang's mother asked for more than 6.62 million yuan, and Yang's sister asked for more than 7.92 million yuan, for a total of more than 21.77 million yuan. The case is still being heard by the High Court.
However, during the trial, the two sides had a heated exchange of words over the offense and defense of the lawsuit. The family of the young man surnamed Yang requested alimony, while the defense requested an investigation into the family's property status. Lin Yuexue not only demanded the liquidation of the Yang family's property, but also questioned the Yang family's donation of 5 million yuan in charity donations as scholarships and bursaries as a "deliberate transfer of assets." After the court, she criticized Li Huixuan for the second time as a "disgrace to the legal profession."
After the relevant news was exposed, netizens began to criticize Lin Yuexue and search for her. The name of her law firm was also maliciously changed on Google reviews by netizens, and many one-star reviews were posted.
In response to this, Li Huixuan posted on Facebook today, "I sincerely ask everyone: please stop these behaviors." Although she cannot agree with the doubts about Zao, and feels distressed and sorry for Yang's father and mother, as a lawyer who has been practicing for 17 years, she always believes that lawyers advocate for the rights and interests of their clients and exercise their litigation rights, which is the responsibility entrusted by the system.
Li Huixuan believes that even if you have different opinions on the lawyer's claims, you should still return to the application of the law and discuss the facts, and argue your case in court. However, actions such as name changes, negative reviews, and online flesh searches will not bring justice to the family, nor will they make the judicial system better.
Regarding the legal attack and defense, Li Huixuan said that he will continue to do his best to fight for the rights and justice that Yang's father and Yang's mother deserve. But outside the court, I also implore everyone to leave their concerns to the protection of the rights of crime victims, juvenile justice and school safety system reform, and once again call on everyone to stop attacking Attorney Lin and his firm.
On October 16, 2026, the Intermediate People's Court of Lanzhou City, Gansu Province publicly sentenced six people including Li Huifang of Brownstone Peixin Kindergarten in Maiji District, Tianshui City in the first instance case of producing and selling toxic and harmful food. The principal criminal, Li Huifang, was sentenced to life imprisonment, and the remaining five defendants were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment ranging from 15 years to six years.
Since its establishment more than eight years ago, the Beijing Internet Court has accepted a total of 4,671 online infringement disputes involving elderly people over 60 years old, and concluded 4,667 cases. 68% of these cases were settled through mediation or withdrawal. The improper use of new technologies such as AI has become a new challenge for the elderly to defend their rights.

Digangana Mukherjee, a Mysore mother, supports reports that the Indian government plans to ban social media accounts for minors under 18, citing screen addiction and online safety fears.

The Keelung District Court held its first hearing today on the case of Feihu Technology general manager Chen Minyan and nine others suspected of reselling Supermicro AI servers loaded with Huida B300 chips to China. Huida Taiwan senior manager Zhang Denglong, who was charged with breach of trust and other crimes, appeared in court to express his innocence, saying that the prosecutors had misunderstood the content of his duties.

A 62-year-old Hong Kong housewife, Yang Chau-ki, was sentenced to three months in a maximum-security psychiatric institution for displaying pro-independence materials and a colonial-era flag.

The civil damages lawsuit for the neck-cutting case of a junior high school student in New Taipei City is still under trial. Defense lawyer Lin Yuexue questioned the victim's family's donation of 5 million yuan as a scholarship and bursary as a "deliberate transfer of assets." He publicly insulted the victim's family lawyer Li Huixuan for the second time as a "shame on the legal profession." This triggered netizens to search the bottom of the website, spoof his law firm, and flooded it with one-star negative reviews, and even renamed it "Lin Yuexue Parking Lot" on Google Maps.