Tejpal had approached the Supreme Court challenging the Bombay high court's judgment which convicted him after a trial court acquittal.
The Supreme Court on Friday refused to suspend the 10-year prison sentence of former Tehelka editor-in-chief Tarun Tejpal, who was convicted of raping a junior colleague in a Goa hotel elevator in 2013.
AI-generated summary
Tarun Tejpal was accused of sexually assaulting a junior colleague in a Goa hotel elevator in November 2013. A trial court acquitted him in 2021, but the Bombay High Court overturned the acquittal and sentenced him to 10 years in prison.
Tejpal had approached the Supreme Court challenging the Bombay high court's August 6 judgment
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to suspend the 10-year prison sentence of former Tehelka editor-in-chief Tarun Tejpal, convicted of raping a junior colleague inside a hotel elevator in Goa in November 2013. A bench of Justices MM Sundresh and Prasanna B Varale dismissed Tejpal's application after considering the evidence, including his emails and messages. The bench was of the view that no case had been made out for suspending his sentence, according to Live Law. Tejpal had approached the Supreme Court challenging the Bombay high court's August 6 judgment, which overturned his acquittal by a trial court in 2021 and convicted him in the case.
What Tejpal argued Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Tejpal, questioned the victim's account of the incident, particularly her claim that the elevator doors did not open during the alleged assault. Sibal argued that technical evidence showed the elevator doors opened twice during the two minutes and nine seconds in which the alleged incident took place. He said the hotel manager and Mitsubishi staff had testified that the lift doors opened automatically at every floor and could not be kept shut by pressing the buttons. He also questioned the investigation, alleging that the investigating officer failed to seize CCTV footage that could have established whether the elevator doors had opened. Tejpal's lawyers further argued that the victim had given six versions of the incident before the FIR was registered on November 22, 2013, and that none of them mentioned rape or oral penetration. They also stressed that Tejpal had remained on bail during the trial and had not misused his liberty.
Goa government opposes relief Solicitor general Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Goa government, opposed the plea and referred to messages and an apology email sent by Tejpal to the victim after the incident. Sibal countered that the apology had been drafted by then Tehelka editor Shoma Chaudhary and claimed it referred to a conversation between Tejpal and the woman, not an admission of rape. The case relates to allegations that Tejpal sexually assaulted a junior colleague inside an elevator at a luxury hotel during a Tehelka event in Goa in November 2013. A Goa trial court acquitted him in 2021. However, the Bombay High Court's Goa bench overturned the acquittal on August 6, 2026, convicted him of rape and other offences, and sentenced him to 10 years' rigorous imprisonment.
India's Supreme Court ruled that the constitutional requirement to produce an arrestee before a magistrate within 24 hours begins at the moment of detention for interrogation, not at formal arrest, eliminating any buffer zone where liberty is curtailed without arrest being recorded.
India's Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution prevails over special laws like NDPS, UAPA, and PMLA, reiterating that the right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right that cannot be violated under any law and can be grounds for bail.
The Indian government told the Supreme Court it is considering forming a committee to review the 2026 UGC regulations on caste discrimination in higher education, after the court stayed the rules in January due to concerns over vague provisions.
India's Supreme Court has decided to review its 2003 verdict disqualifying individuals with more than two children from contesting panchayati raj elections, stating that population-control laws have become counter-productive as the total fertility rate has fallen below replacement level.
The Supreme Court refused to entertain a petition challenging the reservation of Kadipur assembly constituency in Uttar Pradesh for Scheduled Castes, stating that delimitation and reservation criteria are exclusively legislative functions and courts cannot usurp Parliament's powers.
The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit revived a civil rights lawsuit filed by Ralph Isham on behalf of his son Elijah's estate after police fatally shot Elijah in Moraine, Ohio. The court ruled that an initial complaint filed without authorised legal representation is not automatically void when the filer subsequently hires an attorney within the district court's timeline.