
Controversy over allowing nuclear power purchase contracts... “Possession of cherry picking increases the burden of fees”
AI-generated summary
The positions of the National Assembly and government ministries are being discussed over the PPA permit bill and the Ultra-wide Special Zone Act, which allow certain companies to monopolize electricity produced from nuclear power plants.
“A cautious approach is needed for permission within the ultra-wide special zone…possession of cherry picking”
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Jaeyoung Lee = The Ministry of Climate, Energy and Environment announced that electricity rates may rise if a 'nuclear power purchase agreement (PPA)', which allows a specific company or industrial complex to monopolize electricity produced from nuclear power plants, is allowed.
According to Rep. Park Hae-cheol of the Democratic Party of Korea and other members of the National Assembly's Climate, Energy, Environment and Labor Committee on the 26th, the Ministry of Climate Change opposed two bills allowing nuclear power plant PPAs in March, saying, "It would be a monopoly on cheap power by a specific business operator."
The Ministry of Climate Change defined nuclear power plant PPA as 'cherry picking' and emphasized, "If a specific (hydrogen specialized) complex monopolizes large-scale nuclear power plants, which account for 31% of domestic power generation, it could cause significant disruption in the management of national power supply and demand."
He added, "Allowing cheap nuclear power power exclusively to certain consumers runs counter to the purpose of the Electricity Business Act, which aims to protect the public, who are the majority of electricity consumers."
However, in response to a recent inquiry from Rep. Park's office regarding nuclear power plant PPAs and the regulations allowing PPAs in special zones under the Mega Special Zone Act (Mega Special Zone Act), the Ministry of Climate Change acknowledged that "permitting nuclear power plant PPAs is a factor that will increase the average power purchase price and increase the consumer bill burden," but said, "A cautious approach is necessary." Unlike before, this can be interpreted as leaving room for acceptance.
When electricity produced from a nuclear power plant is supplied to a specific business operator through a PPA outside the electricity market, other electricity consumers must use electricity produced from a power generation source that costs more than a nuclear power plant.
Ultimately, the average price at which KEPCO purchases electricity from power plants rises, adding to the pressure to increase electricity rates.
Representative Park's office calculated based on the unit price of electricity purchased in the first half of this year that if one company monopolized the electricity produced by Unit 2 of Wolseong Nuclear Power Plant (4.8 billion kWh per year), the additional electricity purchase cost that would be borne by other electricity consumers amounted to 280 billion won.
Nuclear power plants require enormous financial and social costs throughout the entire cycle, from site selection to radioactive waste management. Accordingly, if a nuclear power plant PPA is allowed, equity issues are bound to arise, even excluding the increase in the burden of electricity bills.
Rep. Park emphasized, “If the Ministry of Climate Change acknowledges in writing the increase in electricity rates when a nuclear power plant PPA is permitted, and remains cautious, it ultimately opens the way to acceptance,” adding, “The government must make it clear that both operating nuclear power plants and new nuclear power plants are not subject to PPA.”
The Ministry of Climate Change said in a separate explanatory material on this day, "We have consistently and consistently expressed our position that we cannot accept bills allowing nuclear power plant PPAs, including the Ultra-Metropolitan Special Zone Act. Considering concerns about an increase in the burden of electricity bills for general consumers and the possibility of cherry-picking due to the exclusive use of nuclear power, it is difficult to accept nuclear power plant PPAs."

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power plans to sequentially restart Gori Units 3 and 4 in the first half of 2027 through facility improvement and maintenance following the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission's approval of the continued operation and operation change permit. Gori Unit 3 will operate until September 2034, and Unit 4 will operate until August 2035.

In line with Amkor Technology Korea's 3 trillion won investment, Jeonnam Gwangju Unified City signed a business agreement with the Korea Rural Community Corporation and the Corporate Renewable Energy Foundation to realize corporate RE100 and established a cooperative system for procurement of renewable energy.

South Korea's nuclear watchdog has approved a 10-year operational life extension for Kori nuclear reactors 3 and 4, allowing them to run until 2034 and 2035.

The Nuclear Safety and Security Commission voted to permit continued operation of Units 3 and 4 of the Busan Gijang Gori Nuclear Power Plant. The lifespan has been extended by 10 years and will operate until 2034 and 2035, respectively.

It has been revealed that Novatech, a Russian energy company subject to U.S. sanctions, is secretly funding and seeking to secure shares in the Alaska LNG development project promoted by U.S. startup Polar LNG. Controversy is expected as it is known that this issue was also mentioned during the negotiations to end the war in Ukraine.

The Finnish government has granted operating permission to Onkalo, the world's first spent nuclear fuel final disposal facility. This facility, built 400 meters underground on Eurajoki Olkiluoto Island, will permanently store high-level radioactive nuclear waste.