
AI-generated summary
Candidate Jiyong Kim attended the National Assembly hearing to be appointed to the position of the first Director of the Serious Crimes Investigation Office. In the past, controversy over political bias within the prosecution and criticism of the process of handling specific cases have been raised.
At the hearing, the position was revealed on the eligibility controversy... “I have never turned a blind eye to fire.”
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Hwang Jae-ha = Kim Ji-yong, the first candidate for the head of the Serious Crimes Investigation Office (Serious Crimes Investigation Office), reiterated that he was opposed to cases of abuse of prosecutorial power in the past and emphasized that he has handled work without being biased by political inclinations.
At a National Assembly hearing held on the 14th, when Rep. Park Deok-heum of the People Power Party pointed out that the ruling party, Gwangju Regional Public Prosecutors' Office Director Lim Eun-jung, and the entire ruling party are opposed to the appointment, Candidate Kim said, "I am well aware that many people have expressed criticism."
He added, “I think a lot of people have said such things because of the importance and weight of the position of Director of the Heavy Water Administration, and I am taking it seriously.”
However, Candidate Kim emphasized, "I am proud that I handled the case with my own conviction without being biased by any political tendency," and added, "So I do not think I am unfit to run the Central Investigation Agency."
Candidate Kim also reiterated that in 2020, when he was Deputy Director of the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office, he was on the approval line to indict then-Chief Prosecutor Jeong Jin-woong on charges of independent violence against then-Chief Prosecutor Han Dong-hoon, but opposed the indictment.
However, he was asked about the circumstances at the time of the indictment by Rep. Yoon Geon-young of the Democratic Party of Korea, and he answered that he remembered that he had paid the bill at the time of the indictment, and that he later cooperated with the Supreme Prosecutor's Office when it investigated the truth of the case.
When Rep. Yoon pointed out that Candidate Kim did not submit materials to the fact-finding team and that he “passed by pretending not to see injustice,” Candidate Kim responded by saying, “I have never pretended not to see injustice and passed by.”
Candidate Kim also expressed his position on former Vice Minister of Justice Kim Hak-eui, former Blue House Civil Affairs Secretary Lee Kwang-cheol, who was indicted on charges of illegally banning departure from the country but was found not guilty.
Chun-saeng Chung, a member of the Cho Kuk Innovation Party, pointed out that Candidate Kim was the head of the Supreme Prosecutor's Office's criminal department in 2021 when the case was being prosecuted, and asked whether he would be willing to apologize to those indicted.
Candidate Kim responded, "I can't say I'm not responsible at all," and "I'm fully willing to apologize personally."
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
A vote on the appointment of candidate Kim Ji-yong will be held at the National Assembly.
Very likely · Within days
Requests for additional verification of a candidate's past decisions may persist.
Likely · Within weeks

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said that there was room to review the government's past statement that the import of nuclear weapons could be permitted as an exception in relation to Japan's three non-nuclear principles. This is interpreted as a reexamination of former Foreign Minister Okada's 2010 remarks that U.S. nuclear-capable ships should be allowed to visit ports for national security reasons. Foreign Minister Motegi also emphasized the need for review on the premise of maintaining principles in response to changes in the security environment, but Prime Minister Takaichi announced that he would refrain from making predictions about the inclusion of specific expressions.

At the National Assembly's confirmation hearing for Kim Ji-yong, the first candidate for the head of the Serious Crimes Investigation Agency, opposition parties such as the Democratic Party of Korea and the Fatherland Innovation Party and some ruling party lawmakers raised questions about his suitability, saying he showed "cowardice" in handling cases during his time as a prosecutor. The People Power Party also criticized that the Central Investigation Agency was launched hastily due to conflict within the ruling party, and pointed out the lack of data submission.

Prime Minister Han Seong-sook ordered the mobilization of all firefighting forces and prevention of casualties at the site of a fire at a manufacturing company in Ulju-gun, Ulsan, and ordered related agencies to ensure thorough safety management. The fire forced the evacuation of 16 workers and about 7,000 workers from nearby factories.

Kim Ji-yong, the first candidate for the head of the Serious Crimes Investigation Agency, announced at a National Assembly personnel hearing that he would consider establishing internal guidelines and regulations to limit the Minister of Public Administration and Security's intervention in the investigation to protect political neutrality. In response to a question about the status of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security's exercise of investigative command authority, he responded that he would create internal regulations if necessary, and emphasized that the will of the commissioner and investigators is important in response to concerns about external pressure from opposition party members.

The National Defense Committee of the National Assembly adopted a resolution led by the ruling party condemning North Korea's DMZ land mine provocation, but the opposition party criticized it as a contradiction in terms, arguing that the military's responsibility for delaying the investigation and finding out the truth should be included in the resolution. During the attempt to vote, People Power Party lawmakers left.

The National Heritage Administration is promoting the establishment of a ‘preservation list system’ to proactively discover and protect neglected, non-designated intangible cultural heritage. This is part of a policy effort to strengthen traditional cultural identity amid concerns about China's cultural process, and will be operated similarly to the preliminary cultural heritage system.