
台北市長蔣萬安於8日提出松山機場遷建政見,預計騰出約300公頃土地用於AI產業園區、住宅及公園。同日當選立法院外交及國防委員會召委的國民黨立委徐巧芯將於14日主持專題報告,邀請國防部長顧立雄、交通部長陳世凱及民航局參與。民進黨新北市議員林秉宥指出,松機遷移議題已討論超過20年,但此次由地方執政團隊提出,政見完整度與說服力可能更勝以往,並強調徐巧芯作為蔣萬安發言團隊成員將對議題具有重要影響力。
AI-generated summary
松山機場遷建議題在台灣已討論超過20年,歷屆候選人如李應元、謝長廷、姚文智、丁守中、黃珊珊等人曾提出類似政見但未當選台北市長,機場亦未遷移。議題核心在於平衡國家安全需求(軍用機場功能與空勤總隊救災任務)與都市發展需求(住宅、公園、產業用地)。
台北市長蔣萬安8日提出松山機場遷建政見,同日當選立法院外交及國防委員會召集委員的國民黨立委徐巧芯,已排定明(14)日邀請國防部長顧立雄、交通部長陳世凱及民航局,就松機遷建進行專題報告並備質詢。
根據立法院外交及國防委員會議程,14日專題報告題目為「松山機場遷建與臺中機場擴建之全國機場軍民航功能重塑」;當天另將審查徐巧芯等21人、民進黨立委陳俊宇等20人分別擬具的全民國防教育法第8條、第9條及第11條條文修正草案。
請繼續往下閱讀...
蔣萬安8日宣布規劃遷移松山機場,預計騰出約300公頃土地,作為AI產業園區、住宅及公共設施與大型公園使用;外交及國防委員會同日以推舉方式,選出徐巧芯與民進黨立委王義川擔任本會期召委。
民進黨新北市議員林秉宥當天在臉書發文指出,從2002年李應元開始,謝長廷、姚文智、丁守中、黃珊珊等人都曾支持遷建松機,但後來都未當選台北市長,松機也仍在原址。他強調,這並不代表提出遷建者必定落選,隨著時空背景改變,發展AI產業、滿足住宅需求、增加公園綠地等訴求確實合理。
林秉宥表示,松機遷移議題已討論超過20年,多半在國家安全考量,也就是松山軍用機場的軍事任務需求,以及空勤總隊救災任務的不可替代性下作罷。
但林秉宥認為,這次情況不同。過去提案者都是挑戰者,或任期屆滿尋求改任的人。如今由地方執政團隊提出,政見完整度與對民眾的說服力都可能更勝以往。
林秉宥也點名,同為蔣萬安發言團隊成員的徐巧芯,已當選本會期外交及國防委員會召委,在松機遷移議題上影響力不容小覷。他直言「蔣萬安認真起來了」,能否駕馭這類大型建設議題,將是蔣團隊的最大考驗。徐巧芯日前與王鴻薇、李彥秀、羅智強、賴士葆等北市藍委,一同加入蔣萬安競選連任辦公室發言陣容。
值得關注的是,從蔣萬安提出政見、徐巧芯當選召委,到國防部等部會赴立院專報,前後不到1週。專報當天台北市長參選人、立委沈伯洋也料將對此題目提出質詢,形同將被推上一場對手缺席的「政見發表會」。
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
立法院外交及國防委員會將於14日完成松山機場遷建專題報告並進行初步質詢
Very likely · Within days
蔣萬安將在後續競選連任過程中持續強調松山機場遷建政見,並將其定位為AI產業發展與都市更新核心議題
Likely · Within weeks

Executive Yuan Zhuo Rongtai responded to Legislative Yuan Han Kuo-yu's criticism during the National Day unscripted performance, pointing out that the Executive Yuan's decision not to countersign unconstitutional and illegal bills and budgets is based on the constitutional rights and obligations of maintaining constitutional order, and emphasized that it is willing to communicate with the Legislative Yuan on the premise of jointly safeguarding national fiscal discipline and constitutional legal policies.

Former President Tsai Ing-wen ended her nine-day visit to the United States and returned to Taoyuan International Airport on a China Airlines flight early this morning. He did not speak after getting off the plane. He only waved cordially to the media present and left immediately. During his visit to the United States, he met with former Speaker of the House of Representatives Pelosi, attended the Stanford DEFCON 2026 seminar and communicated with the Silicon Valley startup team, and also visited stores opened by Taiwanese immigrants in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Former legislator Zheng Yunpeng analyzed People's Party Chairman Huang Guochang's exclusive interview with KMT Taipei mayoral candidate Chiang Wanan. He pointed out that this move fell into the triple dilemma of media role, party obligations and fairness. He emphasized that the position of party chairman should be respected, and he must respect others before he can respect it.

Senior media person Akio Yaita analyzed the "ocean current" phenomenon brought about by the Democratic Progressive Party's Taipei mayoral candidacy, pointing out three psychological changes that reflect Taipei citizens' attitudes toward professionalism, change, and security. He believed that future mayors must have technological and international perspectives, and emphasized that true security requires preparation, deterrence, and resilience, rather than simply being pro-Beijing or taking a hard-line stance.

In the Taipei mayoral election, Democratic Progressive Party candidate Shen Boyang’s camp criticized KMT candidate Chiang Wanan’s camp for playing tricks in the debate arrangement through campaign director-general Wu Siyao, saying that he first proposed "1+1" but was silent during the meeting. Later, he changed his words and said that as usual, only one would be held, and emphasized that Shen Boyang's team had signed the media debate invitation agreement early, actively requested multiple debates, and urged Jiang Wanan to come to the debate immediately, otherwise the PK would be conducted using street soap boxes or live broadcasts.

DPP Taipei mayoral candidate Shen Boyang argued that the debate could be held on October 24, while KMT candidate Chiang Wanan argued that organizers TVBS and Sanli TV indicated that preparations would take at least 15 days, with the earliest feasible date being October 31. Both sides accused each other of disrespecting professional arrangements and delaying the debate. The focus of the dispute was the debate venue and time schedule.