
台東一名離婚男子被未成年女兒指控在108年至110年間多次性侵,但女兒證詞前後矛盾,且受姨丈誘導式追問影響,法院認證詞被污染不能作為證據,一、二審均判其無罪,強調無罪判決係基於證據不足,並非否定被害人所受創傷。
AI-generated summary
本案涉及一名離婚男子被其未成年女兒指控於108年至110年間多次性侵,案件經過偵查後由檢察官提起公訴,但女兒證詞在偵訊與審判過程中出現前後陳述不一致的情況。
台東地方法院。(記者黃明堂攝)
台東一位離婚男子遭未成年女兒指控性侵,前妻作證,但雙方因保護令、婚姻訴訟、剩餘財產分配與扶養費等民事糾紛,加上女兒證詞前後陳述矛盾,一、二審法官均認證詞有被污染,不能做為證據,均判他無罪。
檢察官起訴指控這位男子在108年至110年間,在住處,趁女兒熟睡或因服用精神科藥物無力抗拒之際,多次對其進行乘機性交與猥褻犯行。法院審理後指出,被害女歷次在警詢、偵訊及法院審理時的證詞,針對被害發生的時間點、侵害行為之樣態是猥褻或是手指與生殖器插入、有無反抗以及被告有無射精等核心情節,前後陳述存在根本性的重大歧異,並非單純記憶模糊的細節差異。
此外,法院從卷內資料及通訊軟體LINE對話紀錄發現,被害人的姨丈在雙方對話中存在大量誘導性與封閉式提問,且耗時逾年不斷向她追問細節,難以排除她的證詞受外部資訊或持續追問汙染的可能。法官認為,被告與前妻及前妻親屬間保護令、婚姻訴訟、剩餘財產分配與扶養費等民事糾紛,長期處於高度對立的利害衝突狀態,且有誘導詢問之舉,因此其等證詞不足以補強被害人指訴。
檢察官提出醫院的精神鑑定報告指稱她罹患創傷後壓力症候群且與所述性侵經驗高度關聯。法官也認為她同時面臨父母離異、家庭變故及多重生活壓力,無從僅憑精神鑑定結果直接推論被告確有妨害性自主犯行。
基於刑事訴訟法上的無罪推定與「罪證有疑、利於被告」原則,二審法院最終維持第一審之無罪判決,駁回檢察官上訴。法院並在判決結語中強調,維持無罪判決是受限於現有證據不足,絕非否定被害人所受之痛苦與身心創傷,期盼被害人及家屬能藉由專業心理資源持續療癒,早日回歸平穩生活。
☆自由電子報關心您:若懷疑孩童遭受身體虐待、精神虐待或是性侵害、性騷擾,請撥打113專線,透過專業社工員接線服務,將可盡快救援在生命危機中的兒童。☆
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
家屬可能透過民事途徑尋求賠償或請求調整扶養費與財產分配安排
Possible · Within months
被害人將持續接受專業心理治療以處理創傷後壓力症候群
Likely · Within months

The civil compensation debate in the neck-cutting case of a junior high school student in New Taipei City has ended, and the Civil Division of the High Court is scheduled to pronounce the verdict on November 25. The defense lawyer questioned whether the victim's family's donation of 5 million yuan in scholarships and bursaries was a deliberate transfer of assets. The victim's father, Yang Chengxun, responded angrily, emphasizing that the donation was used to help underprivileged students and was never used for personal use. He also questioned whether the argument that the victim's family would be exempted from liability for compensation if they receive social donations is reasonable.
The China-EU Copyright Protection Symposium in the Digital Environment was held in Yinchuan on the 13th. It focused on issues such as copyright governance in the digital environment, China-EU copyright legislation and law enforcement practices, and copyright protection in the era of generative artificial intelligence. It discussed new challenges and new paths for copyright protection under the changes in digital technology, and promoted China-EU understanding, mutual trust, and collaborative cooperation.

The Supreme People's Court issued a typical case on the protection of new plant varieties, involving a blueberry seedling infringement dispute. A certain planting base claimed to have stolen branches through connections and produced and sold the Spanish Praburu 1542 blueberry variety without permission. The court determined that it constituted "a business based on infringement" and applied punitive damages. It upheld the original judgment of compensating economic losses of 144,000 yuan and rights protection expenses of 10,000 yuan.

AI deep forgery technology reduces the cost and threshold for forging evidence, leading to biases in evidence review by judicial personnel, rising litigation costs, and declining judicial efficiency. Judicial organs are building a full-chain evidence review model through technical means, institutional norms and expert assistance to meet the challenges.

An incident in which laundry beads stuck to moisture and exploded after being torn apart by hand, causing the washing liquid to spray into the eyes and causing corneal burns, has attracted attention. The reporter's investigation found that only one of the ten laundry beads was labeled with the warning "Do not tear by hand after the beads have adhered." Experts point out that alkaline detergents are more harmful to the eyes, so they should immediately rinse with water for 30 minutes and seek medical attention. If consumers are injured due to insufficient warning, they can claim compensation from the manufacturer in accordance with the law, but they need to make prejudgmental judgments based on design and use.

On the 13th, the New Taipei Prosecutor's Office charged the New Taipei Prosecutor's Office for violating the Personal Information Law, publicly insulting and defaming the man named Xin, who posted his past criminal conviction record, life photos and residence information on a social platform, and insinuated that he was a "pedophile grass". Sijimao responded humorously to this and said that he was prosecuted earlier than Ko Wenzhe.