
AI-generated summary
Suspect notebooks, in which suspects who have been arrested and detained record their interrogation status, are handed over by their lawyers, and are said to be guaranteed the right of confidential communication, allowing them to meet with suspects without witnesses. Fukuoka Prefectural Police inspected people's belongings at police station detention facilities and opened notebooks to check for any dangerous substances or instructions that would lead to the destruction of evidence.
It was revealed on the 10th that Fukuoka Prefectural Police were visually checking the contents of ``suspect notebooks,'' in which arrested and detained suspects record their interrogation status and other information, during daily inspections of their belongings.
[Special feature] What is “hostage justice” asked by a former lawyer based on his experience as a victim?
According to the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, ``suspect notebooks'' are handed over by defense attorneys to suspects being interrogated to record their contents. The contents of the records are said to be protected by the ``secret right of communication,'' which allows them to interview suspects without witnesses.
According to the prefectural police, when a person is transferred to a detention facility at a police station, they check the inside of the room and inspect the person's belongings. At that time, he opened the notebook for a few seconds to check whether there were any dangerous objects in it or whether there were any instructions that would lead to the destruction of evidence.
The company has changed its practice to not inspecting notebooks, saying it took into account human rights and security needs. The Detention Management Division commented, ``We will strive to provide even more appropriate treatment.''

The United Kingdom, France, Australia, Canada, South Korea, and other countries are broadcasting Supreme Court and Constitutional Court hearings live on the Internet. The purpose of the principle of public openness of trials stipulated in Article 82 of the Japanese Constitution is to check the judiciary by the sovereign, and if the Supreme Court's arguments are made available online, they can also serve as material for public scrutiny. We spoke to Tetsuro Hirano (57), a former judge and professor at Ritsumeikan University Law School.

On the 10th, the Fukuoka District Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim in a lawsuit filed against six expressway companies and the government by a man who had his application for an ETC personal card rejected because he was affiliated with an organized crime group. The plaintiffs argued that the expressway is a public property, and that not being able to use it just because they are affiliated with an organized crime group constitutes unreasonable discrimination.

On the 9th, a lawsuit filed by the former Johnny's Office (SMILE-UP.) against former vice president Shimon Ishimaru, seeking confirmation of the non-existence of any liability for damages, was settled at the Saitama District Court. Mr. Ishimaru praised Smile Up's provision of payment of settlement money as an extension of the idea of the Victim Relief Committee. The amount of compensation has not been disclosed.

The third trial of defendant Kentaro Kitagawa (67), a former chief public prosecutor at the Osaka District Public Prosecutors Office, was held at the Osaka District Court on the 6th, and the female prosecutor tearfully testified about the sexual assault during which she was drunk, saying, ``My heart and body froze.'' The claims of both sides are in direct conflict.

Kenji Kusunoki (58), who lost his wife and eldest daughter when his seven-story building collapsed in the Noto Peninsula Earthquake on New Year's Day 2024, filed a lawsuit in Tokyo District Court seeking approximately 215 million yen in damages from the government and the corporation that owns the building. Based on the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism's expert committee report, the building alleges earthquake resistance defects and the government's inaction.

The Tokyo High Court upheld the 20-year prison sentence handed down by the Maebashi District Court of the first instance and dismissed the defense's appeal against a former driver in Isesaki City, Gunma Prefecture who was charged with causing death and injury by dangerous driving in 2024 for causing the deaths of three family members while driving under the influence.