Zhou Xiaoyun is involved in the anti-osmosis law. Ke Wenzhe: The judiciary has become a political tool and there are double standards for investigation, investigation and handling of cases.

In response to the People's Party's Taoyuan City Council candidate Zhou Xiaoyun being investigated and interrogated for allegedly violating the "Anti-infiltration Law" and posted a bail of 500,000 yuan, the People's Party's founding chairman Ko Wenzhe said in an interview today (11th) that he did not have detailed information yet. However, the subject changed. Ke Chongpao criticized the recent frequent actions of the investigation unit and questioned that social trust in Taiwan's judiciary has not increased, but has declined overall.

At 9:30 am today, Ke Wenzhe accompanied the party’s Zhubei mayor candidate Qiu Chenyuan and the Hsinchu County team to the Luchangli Activity Center in Zhubei City to participate in the community morning exercise. Accept media interviews before the event.

Ke Wenzhe said in an interview that because he was busy with the election schedule, he did not have the opportunity to understand the situation from the secretary-general until late at night. Since the detailed information was not available at that time, the party headquarters immediately asked the person concerned to explain clearly before making a formal response to the outside world.

Changing the topic, Ko Wenzhe criticized the recent frequent actions of the inspection agency, questioning that social trust in Taiwan's judiciary has not improved, but has declined across the board. He pointed out that the current judiciary often gives the outside world the impression of "double standards" of reviewing old cases and handling cases based on color. The most serious thing is that "non-disclosure of investigations" is in vain. Taking his own judicial case as an example, he pointed out that the prosecutors cooperated with certain media to "play a double act" and spread rumors in the media through unverified information, making the outside world question whether the judiciary has become a tool for political thugs and interference in elections.

Ko Wenzhe further cited the case of He Xiumian, the non-party candidate for Miaoli Zhunan mayor who was still detained after being prosecuted, as an example. He questioned that if the prosecutor had completed the prosecution, it meant that the case was over, but he continued to be detained on the grounds of "suspected collusion", which is an obvious contradiction in logic. He bluntly said that this approach cannot be ruled out as "pressuring to extract a confession." If the client does not tell the confession that the prosecutor wants, his detention will be renewed. This is a problem that has long been criticized in Taiwan's judiciary.

Ko Wenzhe emphasized that fair and free competition among political parties is the cornerstone of democratic politics. Once society generally believes that the judiciary has become a political tool, it will severely damage the country's democratic system. He called on how to enhance social trust in the judiciary and thoroughly reform the judicial system, which will be a major political project that Taiwan must face in the near future.