Breaking
UK40+ progressive economists reject Unite leader's claim that Ed Miliband would destroy jobsINDMK Slams Vijay Govt Over Arrest Attempt of Gen Z LeaderINTLInternational Students Targeted in Homophobic Attacks via Dating Apps in VictoriaINQatar Expects Normal LNG Production Within Weeks Amid US-Iran Peace TalksINIndia and US Near Historic Trade Agreement, Aiming for $500 Billion in Bilateral Trade by 2030UKBirmingham Community-Owned Housing Project at Risk Due to Construction Cost DisputeINIAEA Chief Confirms Inspection of Iranian Nuclear Enrichment Sites Amid US-Iran ContradictionsCNMalaysian Police Launch Internal Probe into Officer Accused by LawyerUSViking Age Textile Production Site Discovered in DenmarkAUCanberra's Local Shops: Thriving, Struggling, and the Push for Community SpacesUK40+ progressive economists reject Unite leader's claim that Ed Miliband would destroy jobsINDMK Slams Vijay Govt Over Arrest Attempt of Gen Z LeaderINTLInternational Students Targeted in Homophobic Attacks via Dating Apps in VictoriaINQatar Expects Normal LNG Production Within Weeks Amid US-Iran Peace TalksINIndia and US Near Historic Trade Agreement, Aiming for $500 Billion in Bilateral Trade by 2030UKBirmingham Community-Owned Housing Project at Risk Due to Construction Cost DisputeINIAEA Chief Confirms Inspection of Iranian Nuclear Enrichment Sites Amid US-Iran ContradictionsCNMalaysian Police Launch Internal Probe into Officer Accused by LawyerUSViking Age Textile Production Site Discovered in DenmarkAUCanberra's Local Shops: Thriving, Struggling, and the Push for Community Spaces
Newsgather
Back食物風險不只看致癌物 專家:關鍵在攝取量
食物風險不只看致癌物 專家:關鍵在攝取量
Health
自由时报1d agoHealth3 min readChina

食物風險不只看致癌物 專家:關鍵在攝取量

Quick Look

食農專家韋恩分享日本學者田中越郎觀點,指出評估食物風險不應只看是否含致癌物,關鍵在於攝取量。過度擔憂食物中的致癌物,可能導致「健康食物癡迷症」,反而造成營養失衡與心理壓力,建議回歸「量」的觀念,自然趨吉避凶。

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

食農專家韋恩分享日本學者田中越郎的觀點,指出評估食物風險不能只看是否含有致癌物,更重要的是攝取量。過度擔憂可能導致「健康食物癡迷症」。

Font size

2026/06/22 19:47

食農專家韋恩表示,食物是否有害不能只看是否含致癌物,關鍵在於攝取量與暴露程度;圖為情境照。(圖取自freepik)

〔健康頻道/綜合報導〕不少人聽到培根、火腿等加工肉含有致癌物,就立刻將其列入拒絕往來戶。對此,食農專家韋恩表示,來自日本東京農業大學營養學者兼執業醫師田中越郎的看法是,評估食物風險不能只看是否含有致癌物,更重要的是攝取量。

韋恩於臉書粉專「韋恩的食農生活」與網站發文分享田中越郎的觀點,田中越郎點出,很多人一看到「含有致癌物」就直接跳到「危險」,中間漏掉了最關鍵的「量」。把培根、火腿、或是烤魚、烤麵包的焦痕拿去分析,確實驗得出致癌物質,這點科學早就確認。不過毒理學最基本的原則是劑量決定毒性,一種東西有沒有害,不是看它存不存在,而是看吃進去多少。

韋恩說明,若只是一味地把油、糖、添加物、焦痕全列黑名單,能吃的東西愈來愈少,反而可能演變成「健康食物癡迷症」,每一餐都在做風險評估,可能讓營養失衡。真正該做的不是把愈來愈多東西列入禁區,而是回到「量」,清楚到底多少才危險,再決定怎麼吃。

田中越郎點出的這個盲點,已經發展成一種值得注意的飲食狀態。有些人對食物的「危險資訊」過度敏感,看到加工肉就聯想到癌症,看到焦痕就不敢動筷子。當事人花大量心力篩選食材、查成分、排除一切被貼上「不健康」標籤的東西,一旦不小心吃到,就湧上強烈的罪惡感,這樣的情境已讓吃飯不再是享受,而是一連串的緊張與盤算。

韋恩總結,正確的飲食觀念是了解飲食裡各種的風險,自然地做到趨吉避凶,倒也不必被危險警訊綁架,焦慮與壓力才是健康真正的大魔王。

Open Questions

  • 多少攝取量才算危險?
  • 如何平衡飲食風險與享受?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by 自由时报.

Related Stories

More on this topic加工肉