
AI-generated summary
The driver once claimed that he did not know about the collision on the night of the incident, and took the initiative to contact the other party and reached a settlement afterwards, but he was still punished by the police for a hit-and-run accident.
A large truck driver in Kaohsiung had a minor collision with a car while driving through Zuoying District last year and then drove away. The police fined him NT$3,000 and suspended his driver's license for one month for "no one was injured in the accident and failed to handle the situation in accordance with regulations." The driver complained aggrievedly and claimed that he "didn't even know there was a collision." After the judge investigated the structure of the large truck and the evidence collection footage, he determined that the vibration of the large truck was "difficult to be transmitted to the front of the vehicle." He accepted the driver's statement and ruled to revoke the original punishment!
The verdict stated that the driver of a large truck surnamed Huang was driving a large commercial truck at the intersection of Cuihua Road and Huarong Road in Zuoying District, Kaohsiung City at around 9:00 pm on September 12 last year when he collided with a car. After the incident, the rearview mirror of the car was damaged. The police determined that the driver had hit and run. The Transportation Bureau imposed a fine of 3,000 yuan in accordance with the "Road Traffic Management Punishment Regulations", suspended the driver's license for one month, and had to undergo road traffic safety training.
Please read on...
The driver refused and filed an administrative lawsuit, saying that it was late at night when the incident occurred and he had no idea that he had hit the other party's rearview mirror. It was not until he received a notification from the police afterwards that he was shocked to realize that the accident had occurred, and immediately took the initiative to contact the other party. The two parties also successfully reached a settlement, emphasizing that he did not escape intentionally.
After the trial, the Kaohsiung High Administrative Court reviewed the video and relevant evidence collected at the scene and found that the force when the two cars collided was very slight. In the picture, the truck's body neither shook nor undulated, nor did it deviate from its original driving route. It can be seen that the collision did not affect the driving trajectory of the truck.
The judge believed that large trucks are large vehicles with "the front and the body are not directly connected." When the body slightly collides with other vehicles, the weak vibrations generated are physically difficult to be directly transmitted to the front of the vehicle. In addition, the perception of collision force by large vehicles is far less sensitive than that of small cars with shorter vehicle lengths. Subjectively, there was no intention to escape. The court ruled to revoke the punishment. Can be appealed.

India's Supreme Court declared recent Delhi-area rape cases a 'failure of law enforcement' as students protested demanding women's safety after a teenager was gang-raped.

This article explores how China can improve the quality and efficiency of foreign-related legal services, including optimizing the cross-border notarization process, improving the international commercial arbitration mechanism, and strengthening the connection between commercial mediation and justice, to provide legal protection for high-level opening up and the construction of the “One Belt, One Road” initiative.

Death row inmate Huang Linkai was executed by firing squad last year. The Alliance to Abolish the Death Penalty claimed that there were temporary sanctions and retrial procedures at that time, and filed an administrative lawsuit to challenge the Ministry of Justice's approval of the execution as illegal. The Supreme Administrative Court recently rejected the protest and the entire case was confirmed.

TikTok and its parent company ByteDance will pay the US state of Alabama $100 million and restrict children's use of the platform to reach a lawsuit settlement. This is the first time the platform has reached a settlement with a U.S. state to resolve child addiction allegations.

In response to a dispute over the gift of a house to half-sisters, the court revoked the gift and ordered the return of 340,000 yuan because the recipient had harmed the donor’s biological father. Lawyer He Haoyuan pointed out that the handling of property between relatives should be based on written contracts, and explained the applicable conditions for burdened gifts and civil law anti-filial piety clauses, and reminded that cash transactions need to retain written evidence to avoid the difficulty of proof.

A woman surnamed Zhao in Keelung City donated a house to her half-sister surnamed Xiong. Later, she filed a lawsuit to revoke the gift because Xiong and her father had a physical conflict and called the police. The Keelung District Court ruled that Xiong Nv had lost the case and had to transfer the right to dispose of the house to Zhao Nv and return 340,000 yuan, but rejected Zhao's request to return 100,000 yuan.