Breaking
CNFocus Stocks》Creativity: Muse user growth fell by more than 60% and fell by more than 6%CNUnhappy with continuing to maintain diplomatic relations with Taiwan, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs bans Belize and two Paraguayan ministersTRWednesday warning for IstanbulCNFocus Stocks》 Largan Guang: FA mass production next year, stock price rises nearly 9%CNRiyadh airport attacked for two days in a row, Houthis warn flights to avoid Saudi ArabiaTRThere will be no attacks before the electionsTRTour bus and truck collided! 11 deaths, 26 injuredINTLUS judge orders halt to taxpayer-funded promo ads of TrumpRUKuchma's ex-aide sounded the alarm after Zelensky disappeared from social networksRUIn Ukraine, they demanded that parliament remove Zelensky and begin negotiations with RussiaCNFocus Stocks》Creativity: Muse user growth fell by more than 60% and fell by more than 6%CNUnhappy with continuing to maintain diplomatic relations with Taiwan, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs bans Belize and two Paraguayan ministersTRWednesday warning for IstanbulCNFocus Stocks》 Largan Guang: FA mass production next year, stock price rises nearly 9%CNRiyadh airport attacked for two days in a row, Houthis warn flights to avoid Saudi ArabiaTRThere will be no attacks before the electionsTRTour bus and truck collided! 11 deaths, 26 injuredINTLUS judge orders halt to taxpayer-funded promo ads of TrumpRUKuchma's ex-aide sounded the alarm after Zelensky disappeared from social networksRUIn Ukraine, they demanded that parliament remove Zelensky and begin negotiations with Russia
BackAI虚拟人代言产品“亲测有效”,是否站得住脚?专家说法
AI虚拟人代言产品“亲测有效”,是否站得住脚?专家说法
NEWS
中国新闻网4 hours agoLaw3 min readChinaView translation

AI虚拟人代言产品“亲测有效”,是否站得住脚?专家说法

Quick Look

AI虚拟人在社交平台进行产品测评和带货,但未实际使用产品,专家指出其无法满足广告法意义上的“充分使用”要求,责任主体需进一步明确,否则可能构成虚假宣传。

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

AI虚拟人在社交平台进行产品测评和带货,部分账号标注可接开箱、测评、沉浸式吃播,但产品未同步推出真人测评视频或文案,相关展示画面由AI生成。

Font size

没有味蕾却大谈“好吃”、没有皮肤却力荐“舒适”

AI虚拟人代言产品“亲测有效”,是否站得住脚?

专家表示,虚拟人不能完成广告法意义上的“充分使用”,需进一步明确责任承担主体

本报讯(记者陈丹丹)“今天吃的是抹茶千层蛋糕,味道好香、好浓郁”“爆辣鬼椒面真的很辣,香迷糊”……近日,《工人日报》记者在部分社交平台检索“AI虚拟人”发现,个别账号推出了AI虚拟人吃播、测评视频,并在主页标注“可接开箱、测评、沉浸式吃播”。

记者注意到,AI虚拟人在部分推广视频中介绍产品,且产品未同步推出真人测评视频或文案。在某账号发布的吃播视频中,AI虚拟人测评冰皮月饼、螺蛳粉、火鸡面等食品,相关产品展示画面同样由AI生成。在该账号的橱窗中,附有同类商品的购买链接。

不久前,在某AI短剧制作方发布的商业广告视频中,AI虚拟人称“我的美瞳戴了一天都很舒服”,AI虚拟人能否“亲测好吃”“亲测有效”引发关注。记者了解到,目前,AI虚拟人代言的产品包含医疗器械、保健产品、服装、食品等,一些AI虚拟人以第一人称发布个性化感受。

记者下载AI虚拟人视频制作软件测试发现,软件可随机生成AI虚拟人的口播文案,部分软件一周的会员费用为28元,相关介绍称开通会员后可迅速、批量生成AI虚拟人带货视频。

对于AI虚拟人代言引发的争议,中国政法大学副教授朱巍表示,根据广告法相关规定,代言人应当自己使用过商品或接受过服务,或者近亲属充分使用过,才能作推荐、证明,而AI虚拟人不能完成广告法意义上的“充分使用”。他同时强调,以隐形眼镜为例,医疗器械广告的审核标准及程序与普通广告不同,不能因为使用AI虚拟人代言就绕开相关监管。

今年9月,市场监管总局发布了一批网络食品销售虚假宣传典型案例。其中一起案例中,当事人在直播间利用AI虚拟人宣传该普通食品具备“有助于提高免疫力”等保健功效,违反了反不正当竞争法相关规定。该案系《直播电商监督管理办法》施行后,北京市查处的首个AI虚拟人直播带货虚假宣传普通食品具有保健功能的典型案件,明确了AI虚拟人并非虚假宣传的“挡箭牌”。

朱巍进一步分析称,有一类虚拟形象对应着真实自然人,如一些明星的虚拟形象、可识别的声音、肖像或卡通形象等,将其用于代言并非当然不行。

“真正需要解决的重点,是承担责任的主体到底是谁。”朱巍认为,应进一步明确AI虚拟人代言的责任主体,比如AI背后的开发者、使用者是否需要承担连带责任等。

谈及责任划分,朱巍表示,对于没有对应真人的AI虚拟人代言,原则上要追究广告发布者的真实性保证责任,广告发布者如果不能承担相关责任,广告主、广告经营者应当承担连带责任。

《工人日报》(2026年10月12日 04版)

What to Watch

AI outlook — possibilities, not facts

  • 监管部门将出台更明确的规范,以界定AI虚拟人代言中的责任主体

    Likely · Within months

Open Questions

  • AI虚拟人代言的责任究竟应由开发者、使用者还是广告发布者承担?
  • 现有法律是否足以规范AI虚拟人在商业宣传中的应用?
  • 平台是否应对AI虚拟人带货内容承担审核责任?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by 中国新闻网.

Related Stories

Why are there disputes over insured express delivery?
Law·

Why are there disputes over insured express delivery?

After consumers purchase insured services when sending express delivery, they have disputes with the express delivery company over the compensation standard when the goods are damaged. Express delivery companies lower compensation based on depreciation and other factors, while consumers believe that the insured price should be fully compensated. Experts pointed out that complex price protection rules, difficulty in providing evidence and vague compensation standards are the root causes of disputes. They suggested that the loss determination mechanism should be clarified and consumer education should be strengthened.

中国新闻网
3 min read
Multiple departments jointly released typical cases on the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of financial consumers and investors
Law·

Multiple departments jointly released typical cases on the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of financial consumers and investors

The Supreme People's Court, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration of Financial Supervision, and the China Securities Regulatory Commission jointly released six typical cases on the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of financial consumers and investors, covering financial lending, fund management, digital finance, personal insurance, securities investment and other fields, focusing on hot topics such as format clauses, fair transactions, suitability obligations, rights relief, and diversified dispute resolution, demonstrating the value of financial trials in guiding the high-quality development of the industry.

中国新闻网
2 min read
The Anhui Procuratorate prosecuted Pan Liang for allegedly accepting bribes and using his influence to accept bribes in accordance with the law.
Law·

The Anhui Procuratorate prosecuted Pan Liang for allegedly accepting bribes and using his influence to accept bribes in accordance with the law.

Pan Liang, a former deputy ministerial cadre of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council, was suspected of accepting bribes and using his influence to accept bribes. After investigation by the National Supervisory Commission, he was transferred to the procuratorate for review and prosecution. The Supreme People's Procuratorate has made the arrest decision and designated the Huaibei City People's Procuratorate of Anhui Province to review and prosecute. Recently, the Huaibei Municipal People's Procuratorate has filed a public prosecution with the Huaibei Municipal Intermediate People's Court, accusing Pan Liang of taking advantage of his position to seek benefits for others and illegally receiving huge amounts of property.

中国新闻网
1 min read
The Justice Crossed the Boundary 2-2》The absentee review is still unresolved and he continues to speak out outside the procedures. Scholars: This has violated the ethics of judges.
Developing·

The Justice Crossed the Boundary 2-2》The absentee review is still unresolved and he continues to speak out outside the procedures. Scholars: This has violated the ethics of judges.

Justices Cai Zongzhen, Yang Huiqin, and Zhu Fumei refused to participate in the deliberation of the Constitutional Court for more than 300 days because they did not meet the "10 plus 9" threshold. After the judgment, they still issued negative legal opinions with the title of justice. Scholars Zhang Jiayin and Su Yantu pointed out that this behavior violated the ethics of judges and weakened the authority of the Constitutional Court. They warned that if it continues for a long time, it will affect its final judgment function.

自由时报
2 min read
The Justice Crossed the Boundary 2-1》The whole people may be at a loss as to what to do! The Constitutional Court ruled one thing, and three people said another thing to the outside world.
Developing·

The Justice Crossed the Boundary 2-1》The whole people may be at a loss as to what to do! The Constitutional Court ruled one thing, and three people said another thing to the outside world.

Constitutional Court Justices Cai Zongzhen, Yang Huiqin, and Zhu Fumei refused to participate in the review because they believed that the composition of the five-member court was illegal. However, after the judgment, they still issued legal opinions in the name of the justices arguing that the judgment was invalid. They contradicted the official judgment, causing confusion among the people and shaking judicial credibility. They also warned that if it became a routine, it would undermine judicial consistency standards and procedural justice.

自由时报
2 min read
More on this topicai虚拟人