AI development slowdown concerns trigger mixed market reaction: AI stocks fall, cybersecurity firms rise
Quick Look
Stocks tied to AI development declined on Monday amid calls from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and support from OpenAI's Sam Altman and Elon Musk to slow AI model advancement, while cybersecurity companies surged due to increased demand for protection against AI-related threats, with Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike rising over 13% each.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The article discusses growing concerns about AI development pace following public statements by AI leaders calling for slower advancement, which triggered mixed market reactions as investors reassessed growth prospects for AI-related stocks.
Stocks tied to the AI boom slumped on Monday, but cybersecurity companies rallied, as concerns about a slowdown in artificial intelligence development rippled across Wall Street.
Over the weekend, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called for AI model creators to slow the pace of development after fears voiced by researchers went viral. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and SpaceX's Elon Musk both said they agree with Amodei.
"They may be really good at models, but they're not good at talking stocks and what they're doing is freaking the market," Melius Research's Ben Reitzes told CNBC on Monday.
Chipmakers and server vendors that have seen their fortunes soar in the AI buildout plummeted on fears of dampened growth and rising inventories.Micron , Intel , Marvell Technology and Applied Materials dropped more than 4% each, and Nvidia fell about 3%. South Korean memory maker SK Hynix declined 7% in U.S. trading.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise slid about 11%, while Dell and Oracle lost 6% and 4%, respectively. Neocloud CoreWeave , which Bernstein analysts flagged as one of the most exposed AI names given its massive rural data center reach, dropped about 7%. Data center stocks Equinix and Digital Realty Trust declined more than 3%, while liquid cooling providers such as Vertiv dropped about 8%.
The narrative is having the opposite effect for cybersecurity companies, which are tasked with protecting companies and government agencies from AI-related attacks. Calls for those vendors to ramp up their capabilities hit a fever pitch this summer after OpenAI revealed that its agents orchestrated an attack on Hugging Face.
Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike , the industry leaders, jumped more than 13% each.Okta , Zscaler , Qualys , SentinelOne and Netskope also saw double-digit gains.
CrowdStrike and Palo Alto have played a major role in model development, participating in early testing for unreleased OpenAI and Anthropic models.
SentinelOne CEO Tomer Weingarten told CNBC that cyber companies sit in a unique position to build protection technologies used to monitor agent behavior.
"For the time being, deep and complete monitoring of all computer systems is the only way to have an opportunity to identify when AI does not follow original intent or veers of that path," he said.
The AI slowdown chatter also helped alleviate some concerns that have rocked the software industry. Salesforce , Adobe and ServiceNow all gained.
The big market moves come during the intensifying debate over the risks posed by rapidly improving AI model capabilities. Worries about the power of AI hit a crescendo last week after Jacob Coxon, a researcher at Anthropic who also previously worked at OpenAI, said he resigned out of concern that Anthropic and OpenAI are "gambling with our lives."
Anthropic safety researcher Evan Hubinger responded by saying he believes that there is a greater than 10% chance AI will "kill all humans" within the next decade.
The posts caused a firestorm on social media and led to a response from major AI leaders. Amodei on Saturday penned wrote in an essay, "We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models."
While Amodei called for a slowing of the pace of frontier AI capabilities, he stopped short of pushing for a complete halt. In fact, he said that "progress will still seem fast."
In a post on X on Monday, Altman said "pacing" does "not mean 'stopping'."
"Progress has been rapid and will continue to be. But it should be slower than it otherwise could be; interventions like safety cases and monitoring have significant costs," Altman said.
Ben Barringer, global head of technology research at Quilter Cheviot, told CNBC on Monday that "while things may slow somewhat, the pace of change is still going to be vast."
"Even if training and rollout is slowed, inference is still the area that the industry is short in supply," Barringer said. Inference refers to the actual running of AI versus training, where huge amounts of data are used to improve the underlying models.
"Demand still far outstrips supply, so even if things are to slow a little, company revenues are unlikely to be impacted," Barringer added.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Cybersecurity companies will continue to see increased investment and stock growth as AI development proceeds with greater safety focus
Likely · Within months
AI infrastructure spending may moderate but not collapse due to continued demand for inference capabilities
Possible · Within months
Open Questions
- What specific safety measures or monitoring technologies are cybersecurity companies developing?
- How will the proposed slowing of AI development affect long-term innovation trajectories?
- What regulatory responses might emerge from the AI safety debate?
- How sustainable are the current gains in cybersecurity stocks if AI development slows?





