
AI-generated images depicting crime, childbirth complications and flooding are being used in social media ads by groups Fix Victoria and Better Victoria ahead of the Victorian election, with Fix Victoria spending nearly $100,000 in August despite claiming to be issues-driven and not politically affiliated, while experts note the ads clearly aim to influence voting and exploit loopholes in electoral disclosure laws.
AI-generated summary
Fix Victoria and Better Victoria are advocacy groups running AI-generated image ads on social media ahead of the Victorian election, with ties to conservative thinktank IPA and claims of being issues-driven despite spending heavily on political messaging.
A man clad in a balaclava and brandishing a machete terrorises a worker at a petrol station before firebombing the building on the way out.
A woman gives birth on the side of the road, unable to reach a hospital due to ambulance ramping and crater-like potholes, which also stop a fire truck in its tracks.
A flood of water â emblematic of Victoriaâs âtsunami of debtâ, forecast to hit $199bn in the next four years â gushes from the steps of state parliament, towards a scared child.
These are some of the AI-generated images being used as part of a social media advertising campaign attracting thousands of views less than 100 days out from the Victorian election.
According to one expert, the ads, created by a group called Fix Victoria, cost up to $100,000 to publish in August, which is significantly more than most major parties and candidates spent.
Another group, Better Victoria, is also spending big on short ads to pit Labor initiatives â such as the multibillion-dollar Suburban Rail Loop â against investment in roads, schools and hospitals.
But who is behind these groups and are they affiliated with a political party?
âIssues-driven, not politics-drivenâ
Fix Victoria is run by experienced political operatives who held senior positions at a conservative thinktank, the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA). It began plotting its ad campaign in May, when a group of like-minded people started recruiting paying members who could finance its operations and ads.
Corporate filings show it was registered with Asic in early August by Deborah Henderson, who was until June the deputy executive director of the IPA. Its communications director is Andrew Hudgson, who held a similar role at the IPA until earlier this year. Its head of advocacy is Gideon Rozner, who spent six years at the IPA before working at an investment firm.
Fix Victoria is a separate entity to the IPA and its staff say it is coincidence that three of them previously worked at the thinktank, which is a long-term critic of Labor governments.
In November, Rozner told his social media followers that he was rejoining the Liberal party to support its new leader, Jess Wilson.
âThe best place for me is to stand with the thousands of Victorians who will get around Jess Wilson to defeat this disgusting Labor government and save the great state of Victoria,â Rozner posted on X.
When asked by Guardian Australia whether he is still a member of the Liberal party, Rozner declines to answer but says: âIâve been around for a long time â and my views and affiliations are well-known.â
Rozner says Fix Victoria is an âissues-driven, not politics-drivenâ organisation that wants to âensure our leaders know that everyday Victorians want a plan to get out of the mess we are currently inâ.
âFix Victoria is focused on the three key issues dragging our state down, that being crime, corruption and debt,â Rozner says.
These three issues happen to be key talking points of opposition parties.
âVictoriaâs tsunami of debt steals resources from policing so organised illegal tobacco criminals are making billions, recruiting vulnerable kids and making our streets unsafe,â one 30-second Fix Victoria ad says.
âCampaign groups exploiting loopholesâ
A loophole in Victoriaâs electoral laws means voters may never know who is ultimately funding these ads.
Groups publishing political ads during campaigns donât need to be registered as third-party campaigners unless they specifically promote or oppose a party or a candidate.
The Centre for Public Integrityâs executive director, Catherine Williams, says Victoriaâs laws are narrower in scope than their federal equivalent.
âUnless an entity meets the definition of third party campaigner, no disclosure obligations apply,â Williams says.
During the federal election campaign, mandatory donation disclosures by one third-party campaign group revealed it had been bankrolled by the coal lobby. The group had been attacking Labor, Greens and independent candidates.
Transparency International Australiaâs chief executive, Clancy Moore, says while Fix Victoria does not meet the legal threshold of a third-party campaign group, its ads are âclearly trying to influence votingâ.
âItâs really important Victorians know who is behind these types of campaigns and what their political affiliations might be,â Moore says. âThere is a long history of third-party and fake grassroots campaign groups exploiting loopholes in electoral laws to try to influence elections.â
Rozner says Fix Victoria has âinvested considerable resources to ensure strict compliance with all relevant laws, in particular the Victorian Electoral Actâ.
By avoiding reference to political parties or candidates, Fix Victoriaâs financial backers are shielded from public view unless disclosed by the group itself.
âWe place a very high priority on protecting the security and privacy of our members and supporters,â Rozner says.
Better Victoria was formed a month after Fix Victoria, with its first ads running on Facebook in early August. Its political content is endorsed by the group itself, rather than a office holder.
Listings with Consumer Affairs Victoria show its secretary is Ronald Holzer, a lawyer based in the Melbourne suburb of Caulfied North. Holzer says he only has an administrative role with the group.
He referred a series of questions from Guardian Australia to an unnamed spokesperson, who declined to say who was running the organisation.
âBetter Victoria has obtained independent legal advice regarding its activities,â the spokesperson said. âIt is confident that its activities are fully compliant with Victoriaâs electoral laws.â
The spokesperson said the group had no relationship with any political party and was fully financed by donations from its members. Those donors will also remain hidden.
âOur members include people from a range of backgrounds and professions, who have exercised their right to privacy,â the spokesperson said.
âThey will have spent tens of thousandsâ
An advertising executive, Ed Coper, who worked with Climate 200 and some teal candidates during the 2025 federal election, says the two groups are spending big.
Coperâs agency, Populares, has tracked their spending using public data and says they spent more on Google and Meta ads than any other state election candidate or party in August.
He says Fix Victoria spent just under $100,000 on ads, which was about a quarter of all the advertising spend related to the election. Better Victoria spent about $40,000.
The two groups also outspent the Liberals, teal independents and One Nation on social media advertising, according to Populares.
Then thereâs the ad Fix Victoria ran in the middle of the AFL wildcard final between the Western Bulldogs and Collingwood on Channel Seven on 28 August.
âThey will have spent tens of thousands of dollars,â Coper says. âThe actual content of their advertising is very, very similar to the way that a political operative will message during an election campaign.â
AI outlook â possibilities, not facts
Electoral authorities will face increased pressure to close disclosure loopholes for third-party campaign groups
Likely ¡ Within months
Fix Victoria will continue to deny formal Liberal Party affiliation while maintaining operational ties to former IPA staff
Likely ¡ Within weeks

Nigel Farage stated he 'wasn't even listening' during a meeting where undercover reporters posed as foreign donors seeking to evade UK election law, as Reform UK faces police investigation over alleged illegal foreign donations, leading to suspensions of key aides Dan Jukes and James Orr, while the party conference in Birmingham saw policy announcements overshadowed by the scandal and climate protest incidents.

Ryan Bridge, leader of the Raise the Colours flag campaign and under investigation for racially and religiously aggravated harassment, was invited to Reform UK's annual conference where Nigel Farage offered legal support and praised his activism, despite ongoing legal actions from Birmingham City Council and Thames Valley Police.

The UK government's devolution plans for England are likely to be messy and slow due to Whitehall resistance, judicial reviews of local government reorganisation, and unclear debt allocation, with critics warning of political motivation and lack of evidence for structural reform benefits.

Nigel Farage stated he was not listening to a conversation involving his former chief of staff Dan Jukes and ex-head of policy James Orr about funneling foreign money to Reform UK through a UK-based son of an American donor, which violates electoral law; both Jukes and Orr have been removed from their roles, Farage denies wrongdoing and claims his family is urging him to quit politics, while Labour and the Liberal Democrats call for a police investigation into the allegations exposed by a Channel 4 and Verbatim Investigations sting.

Reform UK's Birmingham conference was dominated by fallout from a Channel 4 News undercover investigation that cost two senior figures their jobs, sparking internal debate about the party's culture, image as a prospective governing party, and need for stronger infrastructure amid defections, electoral gains, and financial scrutiny.

After six weeks in office, UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham's high approval ratings contrast with growing economic pressures, as Chancellor John Healey warns that half of the ÂŁ24bn fiscal breathing space inherited from Rachel Reeves has been eroded by rising inflation and interest rates, limiting room for Burnham's ambitious plans for public control of utilities, social care reform and mass housebuilding, despite a new report suggesting Manchester's devolution model could unlock ÂŁ80bn in growth if replicated nationally.