Fund list reaction from AKP's Tayyar to Abdullah Güler: 'We learned about Sarıgül's frost color, has the presumption of innocence just come to your mind?'

Coming to the agenda within the scope of the fund investigation; The debate regarding the announcement of the list of high earners led to differences of opinion within the AKP.

AKP Group Chairman Abdullah Güler in his last statement; Former AKP Gaziantep Deputy Şamil Tayyar received a harsh reaction to his words regarding the "presumption of innocence and the need to protect personal data" regarding the disclosure of the lists.

Tayyar, who made a statement on his social media account, argued that the public's demand was misinterpreted and called for the names of 214 people and companies who made extraordinary profits from the funds to be disclosed.

ABDULLAH GÜLER: 'THERE IS THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE AND THE RIGHT NOT TO BE TAINTED'

AKP Group Chairman Abdullah Güler, while answering journalists' questions about the fund investigation in the Turkish Grand National Assembly, evaluated the requests for the disclosure of investors' names.

Stating that all 455 thousand 578 people who invested in the funds cannot be associated with crime, Güler emphasized that investing in the stock market is not a crime.

Güler argued that personal data in the Central Registry Agency cannot be disclosed to the public only because it is requested, and said that the investigation is being carried out by the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office.

Stating that he also wants those who make unfair profits to be revealed, Güler drew attention to the presumption of innocence and the right not to be tarnished.

'DID THE RIGHT TO NOT BE STAINED NEWLY COMED TO OUR MIND?'

Reacting to Güler's statement, Şamil Tayyar stated that the list he wanted to be made public does not belong to the fund victims, but to individuals and companies that make high profits. Tayyar used the following statements in his post:

“Judging from everyone's thoughts, it seems that the fund list requested to be announced is not well understood.

There are those who attribute the non-disclosure to the "right not to be tainted", there are those who say "a new law needs to be passed" for it to be disclosed, there are those who draw attention to the "presumption of innocence", and there are.

According to TMSF; There are 455 thousand 578 people who are victims of funding.

First, the names of 455 thousand 578 people are not wanted to be disclosed.

So which list?

As our Minister of Justice @abakingurlek said, 214 people, 141 real persons and 73 legal entities, made a profit of 187 billion 653 million from 3 funds.

This list of 214 people is requested to be disclosed.

More or less half of them have already been revealed to the public, leaving 100-150 people behind.

Why isn't it explained?

You are announcing the names of thousands of people who somehow produced and earned but could not pay their taxes.

There is no one who hasn't learned the color of Mustafa Sarıgül's frost.

Nothing has been written about Muhittin Böcek, his son and his daughter-in-law.

Fatma Betül Sayan Kaya's entire life was scrutinized.

Where was the presumption of innocence?

Has the right not to be stained just occurred to us?

Has a law been passed for these?

Look, I swear, the headman of a remote village in Gaziantep Şehitkamil says, "If the fund list is not announced, there will be no votes."

When will you notice these reactions reaching all the way to the mountain village?