
The 160 million lawsuit brought by Mediaset and several well-known faces is underway before the Civil Court of Milan
Fabrizio Corona said he was not scared at the end of the first hearing of the 160 million euro civil case brought against him by Mediaset, Pier Silvio and Marina Berlusconi and various presenters for an alleged hate campaign.
AI-generated summary
Mediaset and several television personalities have filed a 160 million civil lawsuit against Fabrizio Corona for an episode of the podcast 'Falsissimo'.
"I take responsibility for everything I said, I'm not afraid." Fabrizio Corona stated this in front of reporters as he left the room of the first hearing, before the Civil Court of Milan, of the maxi lawsuit brought against him last February by the Mediaset group, by Pier Silvio and Marina Berlusconi, by Maria De Filippi, Silvia Toffanin, Gerry Scotti, Ilary Blasi and Samira Lui, with a request for reputational and financial damages, for a "campaign of hatred" and defamation, from 160 million euros in total, in particular for a January 26 episode of the former photo agent's podcast 'Falsissimo'.
Today the lawyers of the group, the leaders and the hosts (not present in the courtroom), the lawyers Andrea Di Porto, Giulia Bongiorno and Salvatore Pino, discussed for about an hour, in front of judge Stefania Novelli of the first civil section, together with the lawyers of the former photographer of the VIPs and of the Atena company, the lawyers Piergiorgio Molinari, Umberto Ilardo and Laura Bertani. The latter, essentially, have asked not to admit a series of evidence requested by the other party and in the next few days the judge will file an order with which she will express her opinion on the evidence. In the case of admission, the civil proceedings will continue with further hearings, otherwise a decision will be reached immediately.
In a brief, filed in recent weeks by the lawyers of the promoters of the case, the requests for damages against the former "king of the paparazzi" were confirmed. Corona, the lawyers wrote, "deliberately places itself outside of any regulated context, exploiting the regulatory gaps connected to the new means of communication, to try to operate 'legibus solutus', free from any ethical and deontological rules".
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The judge will enter an order on the evidence requested
Very likely · Within days

The Supreme Court prosecutor asked for a new appeal trial for five policemen convicted in the Shalabayeva case. The request distinguishes the positions between the heads of Mobile and Immigration, invoking the prescription for the kidnapping of the mother.

The judges of the Supreme Court have reserved the right to decide on the appeals against the stop at the hot processing area of Ilva and Acciaierie d'Italia in Taranto. The general prosecutor's office asked to accept part of the appeals to avoid the shutdown of the blast furnaces.

The Supreme Court prosecutor asked for a new appeal process for the five policemen involved in the 2013 Shalabayeva case, distinguishing the positions between the Flying Squad and the Rome Immigration office.

The general advocate of the Supreme Court Luigi Birritteri criticized the decree of the Court of Appeal of Milan on the stop to the hot area of the former Ilva in Taranto for the lack of a balance between health and production.

The Antitrust has adopted guidelines on online reviews for hotels and restaurants. Tools such as receipts and QR codes are provided to prove the purchase and combat fake reviews, with strict rules for incentivized ones.

The hearing begins in the Court of Cassation for the former Ilva on the decree of the Court of Appeal of Milan which ordered the stop of the plants for health reasons. In the afternoon, meeting at the Ministry of Labor with the trade unions.