
Daniel Stelter and ifo economist Dr. Mathias Dolls on the consequences of rent controls and nationalization plans
AI-generated summary
Discussion about the economic consequences of political interventions in the Berlin housing market.
In Berlin, the signs point to a government that actually believes that the problem of a lack of living space and the resulting rising rents can be solved by nationalizing existing apartments. If there was any need for further proof of how poor economic understanding is in the country, then this is it.
However, the plans of the possible red-green-red alliance fit into a chain of political decisions that have already contributed to worsening the housing problem over the last 15 years.
Studies show that a rent cap reduces the supply of apartments and thus increases the housing shortage. Yes, those lucky enough to own homes enjoy below-inflation rent increases, but for those new to the market, it creates even more shortages.
The supply is falling through various channels: Tenants stay in their apartments because the brake reduces their rent significantly below the market price, owners decide not to rent out or prefer to sell the apartments to owner-occupiers. New construction is being restricted - despite all the politicians' assurances that newly built apartments will be exempt from the rules - because investors know that it is only a matter of time before they will fall under them.
Daniel Stelter speaks with the economist Dr. Mathias Dolls from the ifo Institute talks about how expensive Berlin's housing policy already is today, how to relieve the burden on tenants without exacerbating the shortage, and what needs to happen so that those looking for an apartment finally have a real chance again.

Goldman Sachs now holds 28.28 percent of the voting rights in LEG Immobilien, primarily through financial instruments. The move comes a week after Grand City Properties' entry, sparking speculation about a role as a financial intermediary.
Ministers Stefanie Hubig and Verena Hubertz have presented a draft law for building type E in order to make new buildings cheaper through simpler standards. Associations such as the construction industry and GdW sharply criticize the lack of legal certainty and unclear quality standards.

With “Building Type E”, the federal government is planning a new construction contract law that will allow the waiver of non-mandatory comfort standards in a legally secure manner. The aim is to reduce costs by 10 to 15 percent in order to stimulate housing construction in Germany.
The Swedish real estate group Heimstaden Bostad is suspending investments in Germany as long as there are expropriation plans for large housing stock in Berlin. Co-CEO Christian Fladeland warns of massive impacts on the investment climate.

One year after the construction turbo came into force to accelerate housing construction projects, the results are mixed. While Berlin is recording initial successes, smaller municipalities such as Rüdersdorf and Koblenz report low usage and additional administrative effort.

The federal government has presented a bill for the so-called building type E in order to reduce construction costs and enable faster housing construction by foregoing certain comfort standards.