The Federal Court of Justice has declared Amazon's price increases for Prime subscriptions ineffective due to non-transparent clauses.
AI-generated summary
Amazon increased Prime prices in 2022 without explicit customer consent. The BGH declared the underlying general terms and conditions clauses ineffective due to a lack of transparency.
Anyone who has been a Prime customer with the online retailer Amazon for more than four years will pay less in the future. The company, which has its German headquarters in Munich, has also lost a legal dispute over price increases in the third instance - at the Federal Court of Justice (BGH). (Ref. III ZR 205/25)
Amazon immediately announced consequences after the ruling from Karlsruhe became known. And that's not all for those affected: Another procedure is about getting money back.
What is it about?
Four years ago, Amazon increased the price of Prime subscriptions in Germany without explicitly asking customers for their consent. According to the North Rhine-Westphalia consumer advice center, millions of customers were affected. From the point of view of consumer advocates, the increase was illegal and they took it to court.
Since September 2022, Prime customers have paid 89.90 instead of 69 euros for annual billing, and 8.99 instead of 7.99 euros for monthly payments. The service offers, among other things, fast and free shipping as well as video and music streaming. Amazon justified the price increase at the time with increased costs.
What did the BGH decide?
The highest civil judges in Germany have declared the disputed regulations on price adjustments in the general terms and conditions ineffective due to a violation of the transparency requirement. The third civil senate in Karlsruhe decided that it was not sufficiently clear which rights the contractual partner was entitled to in connection with a price increase by Amazon. Customers are unduly disadvantaged by the lack of transparency.
In the lower courts, the Düsseldorf Regional Court and the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court had also declared the price adjustment clause for the German Prime membership program to be ineffective. Amazon took action against the ruling at the BGH.
What does the ruling mean for Prime customers?
For old customers, the old prices will apply again until further notice. “We do not agree with the ruling on the implementation of our price change, but will temporarily adjust the Prime contribution for customers whose membership began before September 15, 2022 and has remained unchanged since then,” said an Amazon spokeswoman. Affected customers should be informed of the current status before the next payment date.
What about fees that have already been paid?
Consumers can either request money back individually. Limitation periods must be taken into account. According to Iwona Husemann, legal advisor for consumer law at the consumer advice center, those affected can claim the last three years.
Or they join a class action lawsuit that the North Rhine-Westphalia Consumer Center has already filed with the Hamm Higher Regional Court in December 2025, regardless of the outcome at the BGH (case I-13 VKl 1/25). According to Husemann, this goes back to the price increase. According to consumer advocates, how high the individual claim is depends, among other things, on how long the increased premium was paid and which Prime model was used.
In January, the Federal Office of Justice opened a so-called lawsuit register in which you can register as a person affected. According to the North Rhine-Westphalia consumer center, around 145,000 people have done this so far. Registration is still possible – up to three weeks after the end of the oral hearing.
How do consumer advocates react?
They are happy about protecting consumers from incalculable price increases. “The BGH has now made it clear: Not every price adjustment clause is a free pass for companies,” explained the board of the NRW consumer advice center, Wolfgang Schuldzinski.
What role does the judgment play beyond the specific case?
A supreme court clarification by the BGH on the effectiveness of unilateral price adjustment clauses in streaming or long-term obligations has a signal effect that goes beyond the Amazon case, explained Daniela Holzinger from the Consumer Protection Association (VSV). He has also started proceedings over price increases at Netflix, Apple TV and Wow.
The fact that the BGH has confirmed the line of the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court strengthens the chances of success of the reclaim claims. However, you have to look closely at the specific clauses in each individual case.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Amazon lowers Prime prices for eligible existing customers.
Very likely · Within weeks

The BGH has declared Amazon's Prime price increase from 2022 ineffective due to non-transparent terms and conditions. Amazon announced that it would temporarily adjust contributions for affected old customers. Customers can claim back amounts already paid individually or through a class action.
The Federal Court of Justice has declared the Amazon price increase for Prime subscriptions from 2022 to be ineffective. The clauses in the general terms and conditions violate the transparency requirement because customers were not asked for consent. Amazon announced an adjustment for affected customers.
The relatives of Renée Good, who was shot by ICE officers in Minneapolis in January, have filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump's administration. They accuse the authorities of negligent actions and violating civil rights during “Operation Metro Surge”.
The Berlin-Brandenburg Higher Administrative Court has stopped the night-time closure of Görlitz Park. The judges confirmed that the Senate administration was not technically responsible for the measure. Residents and initiatives celebrated the legal success.
The Federal Court of Justice has confirmed the guilty verdict against a 71-year-old for a double murder in 1996, but overturned the sentence. The case will be referred back to the Saarbrücken regional court for a new hearing.
The Duisburg regional court has acquitted nine police officers of charges of causing grievous bodily harm while in office. A refugee from Guinea died in 2024 after being restrained in a prone position. The court deemed the measure necessary and proportionate.