Back死囚黃麟凱遭槍決廢死聯盟提告敗訴 裁定確定
死囚黃麟凱遭槍決廢死聯盟提告敗訴 裁定確定
NEWS
自由时报yesterdayLaw2 min readChinaView translation

死囚黃麟凱遭槍決廢死聯盟提告敗訴 裁定確定

Quick Look

死囚黃麟凱去年遭執行槍決,廢死聯盟主張當時有暫時處分及再審程序進行,提行政訴訟質疑法務部核准執行違法。最高行政法院日前駁回抗告,全案確定。

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

黃麟凱於2013年間殺害前女友及母遭判死刑定讞,並於2025年1月遭槍決。廢死聯盟質疑執行程序違法提起行政訴訟。

Font size

2013年間勒死王姓前女友及其母親的黃麟凱,去年1月遭執行槍決。(資料照)

死囚黃麟凱去年1月伏法後,廢死聯盟主張當時有憲法法庭暫時處分及刑事再審程序進行,質疑法務部核准執行違法,提起行政訴訟。一審台北高等行政法院認定死刑執行屬刑事裁判執行範疇,行政法院並無審判權,裁定駁回;廢死聯盟不服提起抗告,最高行政法院日前駁回抗告,全案確定。

社團法人台灣廢除死刑推動聯盟主張,法務部核准黃麟凱死刑執行的「令准」,直接產生剝奪受刑人生命的法律效果,性質屬於行政處分。聯盟認為,當時仍有憲法法庭聲請暫時處分及刑事再審程序進行中,法務部卻仍核准執行,已違反相關規定及憲法法庭判決意旨,提告請求確認執行函違法。

一審北高行今年5月裁定指出,刑事案件的偵查、起訴、裁判及執行,均屬於刑事司法體系。法務部審核死刑案件是否令准執行,屬刑事裁判執行程序;若對執行過程產生爭議,應由刑事法院救濟,行政法院對此並無審判權,據此裁定駁回。最高行政法院審理後認同原裁定見解,24日駁回廢死聯盟抗告,全案確定。

黃麟凱於2013年間在新北市三重殺害王姓前女友及其母,最高法院於2017年駁回上訴,判處死刑定讞;2025年1月16日槍決,為總統賴清德任內首度執行。廢死聯盟當初提告時,全台待執行死刑犯共36人,扣除後續2人在監死亡,目前待執行死刑犯為34人。

Open Questions

  • 未來是否還有類似訴訟?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by 自由时报.

Related Stories

Foreign-related legal construction: the legal force that supports high-level opening up to the outside world
Law·

Foreign-related legal construction: the legal force that supports high-level opening up to the outside world

This article explores how China can improve the quality and efficiency of foreign-related legal services, including optimizing the cross-border notarization process, improving the international commercial arbitration mechanism, and strengthening the connection between commercial mediation and justice, to provide legal protection for high-level opening up and the construction of the “One Belt, One Road” initiative.

中国新闻网
6 min read
Lawyers remind relatives that the handling of property between relatives must be written in black and white. Donations with burdens and clauses to prevent unfilial piety are key
Law·

Lawyers remind relatives that the handling of property between relatives must be written in black and white. Donations with burdens and clauses to prevent unfilial piety are key

In response to a dispute over the gift of a house to half-sisters, the court revoked the gift and ordered the return of 340,000 yuan because the recipient had harmed the donor’s biological father. Lawyer He Haoyuan pointed out that the handling of property between relatives should be based on written contracts, and explained the applicable conditions for burdened gifts and civil law anti-filial piety clauses, and reminded that cash transactions need to retain written evidence to avoid the difficulty of proof.

自由时报
2 min read
Keelung City’s dispute over house donation: Ms. Zhao wins the lawsuit and Ms. Xiong must return the house and 340,000 yuan
Developing·

Keelung City’s dispute over house donation: Ms. Zhao wins the lawsuit and Ms. Xiong must return the house and 340,000 yuan

A woman surnamed Zhao in Keelung City donated a house to her half-sister surnamed Xiong. Later, she filed a lawsuit to revoke the gift because Xiong and her father had a physical conflict and called the police. The Keelung District Court ruled that Xiong Nv had lost the case and had to transfer the right to dispose of the house to Zhao Nv and return 340,000 yuan, but rejected Zhao's request to return 100,000 yuan.

自由时报
2 min read
The driver of a large truck in Kaohsiung had a slight collision without knowing it. The judge found that the vibration was difficult to transmit to the front of the vehicle and revoked the penalty.
Developing·

The driver of a large truck in Kaohsiung had a slight collision without knowing it. The judge found that the vibration was difficult to transmit to the front of the vehicle and revoked the penalty.

A large truck driver in Kaohsiung slightly collided with a car in Zuoying District last year and then drove away. The police fined him NT$3,000 for a hit-and-run incident and suspended his driver's license for one month. The driver claimed he had no knowledge. After investigating the evidence, the Kaohsiung High Administrative Court determined that the structure of the large truck made it difficult for vibrations to be transmitted to the front of the vehicle, and that there was no intention to escape subjectively. The original punishment was revoked.

自由时报
1 min read
More on this topic黃麟凱