'Combined failure' behind $116m for Queensland police building
Crime and Corruption Commission finds missed opportunities at every stage of Stones Corner property deal
Quick Look
Queensland's Crime and Corruption Commission found the Queensland Police Service's $116 million lease of an unused Stones Corner building was a combined failure, with missed opportunities at every stage, no competitive process, and spending beyond budget without government approval.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The Queensland Police Service sought to consolidate its accommodation in Brisbane and entered a conditional agreement to lease a property in Stones Corner at about $500,000 a month over 15 years. The property was later assessed as not fit for purpose and was never used. Former police commissioner Steve Gollschewski complained to the Crime and Corruption Commission in November 2024 about the procurement process and lack of due diligence.
The decision by Queensland police to spend $116 million to lease a building it has never used was a "combined failure", with opportunities to stop it missed at every turn, the state's corruption watchdog has found.
The Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC) noted in its report the Queensland Police Service (QPS) did not consider buying the property in the inner Brisbane suburb of Stones Corner throughout the process, even though the lease over 15 years "far exceeded" the purchase price.
In its bid to consolidate its accommodation in Brisbane, the QPS entered into a conditional agreement to lease the property at about $500,000 a month, but it was later assessed as not being fit for purpose.
The matter was investigated by the CCC following a complaint by former police commissioner Steve Gollschewski in November 2024, over the procurement process and lack of due diligence before a contract was entered.
The investigation identified no dishonesty, improper relationship or personal gains, but the CCC found opportunities were missed at every stage to halt the transaction.
"Due diligence was undertaken and legal advice sought only after the commitment, and the QPS did not use available opportunities to reconsider before becoming bound."
The report found there was no competitive process or independent check to determine whether the terms were appropriate, reasonable, and represented value for money.
The CCC also found the QPS committed to spending beyond its budget without government approval, with its request for funding later denied.
"By committing before securing funding, it lost both the option to withdraw and its negotiating leverage," the report states.
The CCC has made nine recommendations to the QPS and has noted it has been working with senior officers since June to discuss the corruption risks it identified.
The recommendations include conducting reviews of leasing processes to examine compliance with proper policies and developing and implementing an action plan to address systemic organisational culture issues.
To address the broader risks to the public sector the CCC has recommended the Queensland Government review its whole-of-government accommodation policy to determine if additional advice or direction is required to ensure appropriate public sector representation in office accommodation matters, including clearer guidance on what constitutes an "operational workplace" and how to apply this definition.
The QPS has been contacted for comment.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Queensland Police Service will conduct reviews of leasing processes and implement an action plan to address systemic organisational culture issues.
Likely · Within months
The Queensland Government will review its whole-of-government accommodation policy to determine if additional advice or direction is required.
Possible · Within months
Open Questions
- What specific actions will the Queensland Police Service take to implement the nine recommendations?
- Will the Queensland Government review its whole-of-government accommodation policy as recommended?
- What financial recovery or penalty measures, if any, will be pursued regarding the unused lease?
