
台北西門町同志酒吧「Commander D」週末遭搜查,警員被指發表歧視言論及執法不當,引發百人抗議,台北市長蔣萬安要求檢討。
台灣台北同志酒吧「Commander D」於10月3日遭警方搜查並帶走多人,期間傳出警員涉嫌發表歧視身障者等不當言論。事件引發過百人到派出所抗議,警方隨後證實有6名警員言行不當並已予以申誡懲處。
AI-generated summary
台灣於2019年成為亞洲首個將同性婚姻合法化的地區,台北預計於本月底舉辦東亞規模最大的同志遊行活動。
台灣台北西門町同志酒吧「Commander D」週末遭搜查,其間現場警員被指發表歧視言論及執法不當,引起爭議。
上週六(10月3日)下午的搜查中,負責人被拘捕,多名現場民眾被帶走。關注LGBT社群權益團體週日(4日)號召到西門町紅樓前派出所抗議警察執法不當,逾百人出席。
當地警方一度澄清「並無對身障人士進行言語羞辱」,其後證實有警員言行不當已懲處,有六名警員被申誡;台北巿長蔣萬安週一(5日)稱,將要求警察局檢討。
台灣在2019年成為亞洲首個將同性婚姻合法化的地區,台北將於本月底舉辦東亞規模最大的同志遊行活動,警方行動引發外界對當地自由開放形象的關注。
警員在搜索期間做了什麼?
綜合台灣媒體報道,警方上週六下午突擊搜查「Commander D」酒吧,從現場帶走酒吧負責人鍾姓男子及其他在場人士共52人,其中包括上半身赤裸的男性,並檢獲安全套、潤滑油等。
「Commander D」為男同志 BDSM 主題酒吧,開業超過十年,BDSM 是指一種涉及束縛、支配調教、施虐受虐與感官刺激的性行為模式。
台北市警察局萬華分局表示,已將鍾男以涉嫌妨害風化罪嫌移送台北地方檢察署(台北地檢署)偵辦,其餘相關人等以涉嫌違反社會秩序維護法處罰。
搜查行動後,網絡流傳帖文,其中有現場錄音,有警員曾表示:「殘障還可以在裡面做愛喔?」
BBC中文未能獨立核實錄音內容。亦有影片顯示,有警員稱,在場人士不能錄影。
偵查隊隊長陳怡凱一度澄清稱,並無對特定身障人士進行言語羞辱。
警方表示,此案是經民眾檢舉、合法蒐證,確認有妨害風化情事,有員警言行不當已懲處在案。警方亦證實,執法過程確有員警言行不當,已予以行政懲處,有6名警員被申,後續將持續加強教育訓練,要求員警尊重多元文化、保障市民權益。
民間發起遊行抗議
在西門町紅樓前的派出所外舉行的抗議活動上,自稱曾被警方帶走的民眾溫(Wen)先生對路透社表示:「他們很暴力地突襲,真的非常可怕。」
其中一名抗議者楊康(Kang Yang)表示,警方採取行動正值「驕傲月」(Pride Month),讓他相當憤怒,他強調:「我不能接受這件事。這座城市過去曾自稱對同志很友善。」
多個關注同志權益及人權組織發起聯合聲明關注事件,指出執法機關有必要偵辦特定案件,也須在法律授權的邊界內,以最小侵害方式進行,提出五項訴求,包括獨立調查、保留當時的執法紀錄等。
中國國民黨籍台北市長蔣萬安週一被問及事件時說:「不論是什麼年齡、性別、性傾向、身分族群或認同,都是我們共同要守護、享有相同權利的台北人。」
「對於被影響的人我也非常抱歉,那過程當中,執法的過程,如果有不當,當然就必須要嚴加的檢討。」
執政民進黨立法委員,台北市長參選人沈伯洋說,警察依法執法大家都尊重,如果有違法的事情,應該依法處理,但依法執法不代表執法的方式不需要被檢視。
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
台北市政府與警察局將就執法程序展開內部檢討與加強教育訓練
Very likely · Within weeks

During the National Day holiday, the Hangzhou Procuratorate incorporated the safety of high-risk tourism and sports projects into public interest litigation and people's livelihood matters, used digital means to accurately detect safety hazards such as unlicensed operations and aging equipment, and coordinated with administrative departments to promote a closed loop of problem rectification and use cases to promote treatment and build a long-term supervision mechanism.

Britain's disgraced former prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has launched a High Court challenge to quash search warrants obtained by Thames Valley Police ahead of his arrest for suspected misconduct in public office.

The High Court held a hearing on the Kuomintang political donation and breach of trust case. Accountant Duan Muzheng pleaded guilty and appealed only against the sentencing. His legal team advocated separate trials and pointed out that Duanmuzheng did not commit serious crimes and the collegial panel will evaluate whether to conduct separate trials.

An old man surnamed Yao from Pingtung County tripped over a protruding floor tile while passing the Hengchun Town Ring Trail on May 29, 2022. After being sent to the hospital, he died of neurological shock due to a high cervical spine fracture on June 8. His three children applied for state compensation. In the first instance, the Pingtung District Court held that the Hengchun Town Office was responsible for the maintenance and found that the death was causally related to the protruding floor tiles, and awarded compensation of 3,845,757 yuan. The Hengchun Town Office appealed twice, but both were rejected by the Kaohsiung Branch of the High Court and the Supreme Court, and the entire case was confirmed.

A man surnamed Ling ran a pig farm in partnership with Zheng Nan and Li Nan. He sold 75 pigs without consent and used 150,000 yuan in front money. The Pingtung District Court sentenced him to 10 months in prison for business embezzlement. The second instance of the Kaohsiung High Court found that it should be a civil dispute and Ling Nan was found not guilty.

Former Taipei University of Technology professor Wang Longchang was acquitted of the Nangang Exhibition Hall project bidding fraud case. The key lies in the inconsistent testimony of Huang Wei'an, the special assistant to the chairman of Rio Tinto Construction who accused him of accepting bribes, and the lack of objective evidence such as cash flow to reinforce it. Crime prevention experts point out that although tainted witnesses can help expose hidden crimes, they may falsely accuse others in order to reduce their sentences. Therefore, when forming free evidence, the court still needs to fully investigate objective evidence that is favorable to the defendant and explain the reasons for acceptance or rejection to avoid miscarriage of justice.