Court of Appeal overturns ban on Orangemen march through nationalist area of Portadown
Quick Look
The Court of Appeal overturned a High Court injunction that had banned an Orangemen parade through the nationalist Garvaghy Road area in Portadown, Northern Ireland, allowing the march to proceed under restrictions after a legal challenge by residents' groups over concerns of potential escalation in a long-running sectarian dispute.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The Drumcree parade dispute began in the mid-1990s and almost derailed the Northern Ireland peace process, with violence including riots, roadblocks and murders. The Parades Commission was established in 1998 to regulate parades and reduce tensions, but its decisions have been repeatedly challenged by the Orange Order over the past three decades.
The Court of Appeal has overturned a ban on Orangemen marching through a largely nationalist part of Northern Ireland on Sunday.
The parade had been given permission to go ahead along the contentious Garvaghy Road route in Portadown for the first time in almost three decades, with restrictions in place.
That decision was challenged in court on Saturday by a residents' group and a High Court judge issued an injunction halting the march ruling the "long-running dispute" between residents and local Orangemen had "the potential to escalate" should it proceed.
Disputes over the Garvaghy Road route in the 1990s sparked some of the most serious public disorder in Northern Ireland's history.
The decision banning Sunday's parade was appealed by an Orange Order member, with an emergency court sitting late on Saturday night.
Judge Patricia Smyth issued the injunction after Portadown District Orange Lodge declined her request to postpone the parade until all issues were properly considered.
The judge, who has been hearing the legal challenge to the Parades Commission's decision, said the temporary injunction would apply until the judicial review application could be properly determined.
A large crowd of residents and supporters had gathered at the Drumcree Centre off the Garvaghy Road while the Order's appeal was being heard.
Earlier Sínn Féin ministers Caoimhe Archibald and Liz Kimmons were among politicians who turned up to show support.
The basis of the High Court review was on the PSNI's risk assessment to the Parades Commission.
Lawyer Denise Kiley KC for the residents told the court hearing that "much remains uncertain" in the wake of the ruling.
She claimed that "nowhere" in the PSNI's contribution to the commission was there "any assessment of future risk" and was "entirely directed to past risk".
"That all leads to a requirement for more time and for the Parades Commission to explain the discrepancy that is apparent on the face of the documents," she said.
Delivering her decision to issue an injuction, Judge Smyth said "the level of mistrust" between residents and the lodge cannot be "overstated."
"It is also clear to me that this particular long running dispute has the potential to escalate within Northern Ireland," she added.
"Against that backdrop I am thoroughly of the view the issues of all three parties must be properly ventilated."
Afterwards GRRC spokesperson Breandan Mac Cionnaith said that "this isn't over yet".
He told supporters in a crowd of several hundred outside the High Court not to be "triumphalist".
But, he added, "we're halfway there".
Reacting to developments DUP leader Gavin Robinson MP said unionists would await the court's decision and expect "all parties to respect the legal process".
"The Orangemen of Portadown have conducted themselves with dignity and respect for the rule of law for 28 years. If they must wait for further deliberation, be it 28 days, they will do so with their heads held high and dignity intact."
SDLP leader Claire Hanna MP said Drumcree "carries a history and a meaning that cannot be ignored".
"I welcome that the heat has been taken out of this difficult episode. Lighting the tinder is easy; putting the fire out is much harder."
Alliance deputy leader Eóin Tennyson MLA, said that calm heads were needed.
"Following the High Court's intervention, it is important that everyone now takes a step back and responds responsibly," he said.
TUV leader Jim Allister said he was dismayed at the handling of the judicial review hearing.
"I trust the Court of Appeal will rectify the situation," he said.
People Before Profit MLA Gerry Carroll said he would continue to offer support to Garvaghy Road residents.
"We will not let them drag us back to the dark days of sectarian violence and division."
Earlier on Saturday Judge Smyth had given the parties involved a final opportunity to "reach an agreement" and "step back from the abyss".
Judge Smyth said "it is my view the issues at stake are so sensitive and so important, I would expect all of the lawyers to be creative and to use the law for the good of all the people in Northern Ireland."
The judge said the issue the court is dealing with is of "fundamental importance" to the entire society in Northern Ireland.
Portadown District Lodge submitted a letter in which they outlined their reasons for not agreeing to delay the parade.
"The suggestion there is no prejudice to us is, to be frank, absolutely contrary to all reality," the letter said.
"The prejudice is very clear – those opposed to us could simply ramp up the threat of disorder or violence, to change the factual context, and therefore effectively act as a veto."
It added: "This is not balanced or fair to us; it is depriving us, potentially on a permanent basis, of what we have been lawfully granted for Sunday, with no guarantee this outcome will be replicated even if the Applicant's case is ultimately found to be without any merit whatsoever."
The letter concluded: "We would ask the court not to take this unprecedented and extraordinary step, which we are advised is unheard of and has hitherto not ever occurred."
Earlier the judge highlighted that the information provided to the court from the PSNI has "promoted further enquiries" and "further time would be of benefit to the court."
"In my view it would be contrary to justice and unwise to proceed to make a decision in the absence of information in relation to the issues I have identified."
She said the important date for the Orange Order was July 5 and therefore there "is no prejudice in adjourning for a short period to allow this case to be prepared by all parties ."
Rather than start at 13:00 BST on Sunday as intended, the Parades Commission had said the march could depart no later than 08:00 and with 35 participants , externalrather than the 60 the Orange Order requested. No bands or supporters are allowed.
According to the Drumcree Catholic Church parish website, external, Mass takes place at 08:30 on Sundays in the church of St John the Baptist on the Garvaghy Road.
When asked by BBC News NI if Mass time had been taken into consideration, the Parades Commission said commissioners "recognise that the timings set out in the determination" should allow the church service "to proceed as normal".
In a statement on Saturday afternoon Archbishop Eamon Martin called for "prayers and support for a peaceful resolution to complex Garvaghy Road situation".
The Catholic primate said he shared the "sense of shock and disappointment of so many people at recent developments".
"I also appeal for support for the patient use of solely lawful and democratic processes to resolve this deeply complex and emotive situation."
Fr Peter Clarke, from St John the Baptist in Portadown, said he was concerned the march would "clash" with parishioners coming and going from the church.
He said he had emailed the commission to express his concerns and stated he "doesn't know how they came to" their conclusion.
Parishioners at St Patrick's Church on William Street are also likely to be affected ahead of the 10:00 service, according to the priest.
He added "tensions are high" in the community, and said he will be addressing the situation during Sunday's service.
The decision to give the go-ahead for the parade came after the five-person Parades Commission, led by Prof Evelyn Collins, held face-to-face talks with the Orange Order earlier this week, and a separate meeting with the residents' coalition.
Senior police officers were also consulted about the planned parade.
Within the 31-paragraph determination by the Parades Commission, details were revealed of conversations held with the PSNI.
The document stated: "The police made both written and oral submissions, indicating that they, at the time of making them, had no information indicating that the parade would result in disorder or violence."
The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) said it had activated "mutual aid arrangements to support contingency planning for a policing operation" in Portadown on Sunday.
It is understood about 200 officers are coming from Scotland.
The Parades Commission has been in the political spotlight since its previous Drumcree determination was quashed in the High Court in August.
A review of the commission has since been ordered by the Northern Ireland Office.
The Drumcree parade dispute began in the mid-1990s and it almost derailed the peace process at the time.
Violence related to the dispute resulted in riots, roadblocks and murders.
When the Orange Order was prevented by police from walking down the route in July 1995 there was a tense stand-off. It was the same for the next three years.
The Parades Commission began operating in 1998 to regulate parades and try to defuse tension around marches.
Its decision not to allow a march down the Garvaghy Road that summer has been challenged by the order over the past three decades.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Orangemen march will proceed on Sunday under the restricted conditions set by the Parades Commission
Very likely · Within days
Further legal challenges or judicial reviews may be pursued by residents' groups regarding the Parades Commission's decision
Likely · Within weeks
Community tensions in Portadown may remain elevated in the short term following the march
Possible · Within weeks
Open Questions
- Will the march proceed peacefully under the imposed restrictions?
- How will residents respond to the Court of Appeal's decision?
- What further legal steps might be taken by either side?
- Will the Parades Commission review its risk assessment procedures?






