Global food prices rose during September to their highest levels in about 4 years, with the increasing impact of shipping disruptions and climate fears on crop markets, at a time when the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) warned of these pressures being transmitted to consumer prices, especially in countries that depend greatly on importing food and energy.
The FAO said on Friday that its food price index, which tracks monthly changes in international prices for a basket of basic food commodities, reached an average of 136 points during September, up from a revised reading of 134 points in August, to record the highest level since November 2022.
The rise was driven by the rise in prices of a number of main components of the global food basket. Indices for grains, sugar, and vegetable oils recorded increases during the month, while prices for meat and dairy products decreased.
Global food markets face a simultaneous set of climate, geopolitical and logistical pressures. Fears of a strong El Niño phenomenon have pushed international sugar prices to their highest level in 18 months, amid concern about the impact of weather conditions on crop production.
In the grain market, war-related turmoil and a sharp decline in trade across the Black Sea pushed wheat futures towards a 3-year high during early September. The Black Sea is increasingly important to global food markets, given its role in the movement of grain exports, which means that restrictions on shipping not only affect the quantities available for trade, but also raise concerns about transportation costs and the ability of importing markets to obtain supplies in a timely manner.
At the same time, unrest in the Strait of Hormuz has added a new factor to the pressures facing commodity markets, given its potential impact on energy and transportation prices.
The chief economist at the FAO, Maximo Torero, said that the markets are witnessing a “continuous and widely increasing accumulation in global commodity prices,” with the combination of unrest in the Strait of Hormuz and the Black Sea and climate shocks, which imposes pressure on energy, transportation, and major food commodities.
Torero warned that the continuation of these developments would soon lead to pressures shifting to food prices paid by consumers, noting that the impact would be greater in countries that depend on food and energy imports.
This prospect poses a new challenge for the global economy, because rising energy and shipping prices could extend across the entire food production chain, from operating costs for agricultural equipment, fertilizers and transportation, all the way to storage and distribution.
The simultaneous rise in prices of grains, sugar, and vegetable oils increases the scope of pressures, compared to cases of price increases that are limited to one commodity or a limited group of products. Despite these risks, global grain production expectations still indicate a relative abundance in supply.
In a separate report, the FAO kept its estimates of global cereal production during 2026, unchanged, at 2.979 billion tons. This level represents a decline of 2.1 percent from the peak recorded in the previous year, but it will still be the second largest grain harvest on record, providing some protection for markets in the face of supply disruptions.
But the picture looks less positive when looking at international trade; The FAO reduced its forecast for the volume of global grain trade during the 2026-2027 season by 0.7 percent, compared to its estimates in September.
The organization attributed the reduction mainly to the decline in expectations for wheat and corn exports, as a result of restrictions imposed on shipping routes through the Black Sea. The discrepancy between abundant production and trade disruption highlights a major problem currently facing food markets. The presence of large quantities of grains globally does not necessarily guarantee price stability if they cannot be transported efficiently from production areas to consuming markets.
Thus, global food markets enter the last quarter of the year under pressure from 3 interconnected factors: These are disruptions to trade routes, high energy and transportation costs, and climate risks to crops. If these factors continue, the impact of the rise in international commodity prices may gradually extend to local food bills, with the economies most dependent on imports becoming the first countries exposed to the repercussions of the new price wave.
Finnish Central Bank Governor Olli Rehn said on Friday that energy prices were approaching the “negative” scenario set by the European Central Bank, but the sharp rise in long-term borrowing costs limited the extent to which the impact of this inflation would be transmitted to the broader economy.
The inflation rate has clearly exceeded the 3 percent barrier in recent months, and may approach 4 percent by the end of the year, i.e. double the target set by the European Central Bank, which increases pressure on the bank to raise interest rates again after two increases approved this summer.
While the European Central Bank stated that the risks are towards higher than expected inflation rates, Rehn noted that there are risks in both directions.
“The rise in energy prices brings us closer to the negative scenario of the European Central Bank regarding inflation,” he said at a conference of the European Systemic Risk Council.
“On the other hand, higher long-term interest rates will slow growth and reduce the transmission of the energy shock to other prices and wages,” Ren added. “This confirms that growth and inflation expectations are still subject to a very high and comprehensive degree of uncertainty.”
Government borrowing costs have risen sharply in recent weeks, largely reflecting rising yields in the United States, amid concerns that Washington's fiscal policy is on an unsustainable path.
Yields also rose as the world's largest technology companies issued record levels of debt to finance their investments in artificial intelligence, crowding out other borrowers, including governments, from the market.
At 3.57 percent, the 10-year borrowing cost in Germany, which is considered one of the safest borrowers, reached its highest level in 17 years, while the yield on similar US bonds is 5.32 percent.
Ren also warned that borrowing by technology companies poses a risk to financial stability, given the significant rise in valuations, making a price correction possible.
“A sharp correction in AI-related valuations could extend its impact to stock and credit markets,” Ren said. History teaches us that technological revolutions can transform economies, but it also shows that financial markets may overestimate their immediate returns.
However, Ren said the euro zone economy was showing surprising resilience, and growth rates were withstanding higher energy costs better than feared.
