
As national measures related to kidnapping prevention and rescue are not revealed, 'compensation responsibility' is also diluted.
AI-generated summary
In past incidents involving fishermen who were abducted and returned to North Korea, and in state compensation lawsuits, whether the state violated its duty of protection has been dealt with as a key issue.
As national measures related to kidnapping prevention and rescue are not revealed, 'compensation responsibility' is also diluted.
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Yang Su-yeon = Fishermen who were abducted by North Korea visited the Truth and Reconciliation Committee to investigate the past and what measures the state took to prevent abductions and rescue fishermen.
On the afternoon of the 11th, Fighting Chance, a citizens' group for fishermen abducted by North Korea and returning to North Korea, held a press conference in front of the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in Jung-gu, Seoul, and submitted a truth-finding request to determine whether the state violated its duty to protect abducted fishermen returned to North Korea.
The ships, including the Seungwoon, on which the eight applicants for truth-finding this time were on board, were kidnapped in the East Sea from August to October 1971 and returned on September 7, 1972.
The 2nd Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which investigated these cases, decided to investigate the truth in 2023, saying that after their return, they suffered human rights violations due to illegal detention, harsh treatment, and surveillance by investigative agencies and other agencies.
However, on this day, the applicants claimed that although the state violence after their return was identified, the truth about what measures the state took to prevent kidnapping and save the fishermen at the time was not sufficiently investigated.
This is related to the fact that the court did not recognize the violation of the state's duty of protection in the state compensation lawsuit filed by the fishermen who were abducted and returned to North Korea.
In September of this year, the 2nd Civil Division of the Chuncheon Chamber of the Seoul High Court (Chief Judge Shim Young-jin) ruled that liability for compensation in relation to this was not established in the state compensation lawsuit filed by the abducted fishermen and their families who returned to North Korea.
The fishermen who were abducted and returned to North Korea claimed that they were able to fully foresee the danger and rescue the fishermen due to the repeated kidnapping of fishing boats at the time, but the court found it difficult to say that the state had neglected its duty to protect the fishermen, considering maritime defense capabilities and other factors.
The fishermen who were abducted and returned to North Korea on this day requested to investigate how the investigative agencies understand the circumstances of the ship's capture, what risk information the state possessed and security measures taken during the ship's operation, and, if so, what the reasons were for failing to do so.
The purpose is that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission did not determine whether state agencies' response to kidnapping prevention, security, and rescue was appropriate in past investigations of fishermen abducted by North Korea, and liability for compensation is being passively acknowledged.
Choi Jeong-gyu, a lawyer at Wongok Law Firm, said, “There are still views that attribute responsibility for the abductions to the fishermen’s unreasonable fishing,” and urged, “The Truth and Reconciliation Commission must answer the victims’ long-standing question, ‘Where was the country when we were kidnapped?’”

Singer Lee So-ra applied for an order to seize the copyright related rights of 45 songs, including 'The Wind Blows', against the CEO of her former agency, and received a court decision. The agency Marehim explained that this was a measure to protect the artist's legitimate rights and musical assets.

In the retrial of the late composer Isang Yoon, who was involved in the Dongbaekrim incident, the Public Prosecution Service found him guilty on some charges and requested three years in prison. The bereaved family pleaded not guilty, saying it was a case fabricated by state violence, and the sentencing hearing will be held on December 24.

The Trial System Subcommittee of the National Association of Judges requested the National Court Administration to explain official countermeasures in relation to the confusion over the admissibility of evidence at the trial scene due to the enforcement of Article 245-13 of the revised Criminal Procedure Act.

BJ Gwajuk Se-yeon (real name In Se-yeon) won a partial victory in the second trial of a lawsuit claiming damages filed against cyber wrecker YouTuber Pteokga. The Seoul Central District Court upheld the first trial ruling that Bukga should pay 10 million won to Mr. In.

In the first trial of former Prosecutor General Shim Woo-jung on charges of engaging in important civil war missions, the court criticized the special prosecution team's delay in reviewing records. Former President Shim's side denied all charges and cited the appeal court ruling of former Justice Minister Park Sung-jae as the basis.

The Supreme Court set the 19th as the date for the plenary session of the appellate trial in former Prime Minister Han Deok-soo's rebellion case. With the hearing being held one day before the expiration date of his detention on the 20th, the possibility of former Prime Minister Han being released on the 20th has increased. Former Prime Minister Han, who was sentenced to 23 years in prison in the first trial and 15 years in prison in the second trial, is about to expire without detention despite the special prosecutor's request for a speedy sentencing.