
The warrant was issued after summons could not be served because his residence was found locked.
A Delhi court issued a bailable warrant against YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in an 8-year-old criminal defamation case filed by Vikas Pandey, after fresh summons could not be served because his residence was locked.
AI-generated summary
An eight-year-old criminal defamation case was filed by Vikas Pandey against YouTuber Dhruv Rathee over a video.
A Delhi court has issued a bailable warrant against YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in an eight-year-old criminal defamation case filed by Vikas Pandey, after being informed that a fresh summons issued could not be served as the premises of his residence was found locked.
The Saket Courts passed the order on Saturday after being apprised that the service of summons on Rathee remained incomplete.
The court has now listed the matter for further hearing on October 31. In an order passed earlier this month, the court had permitted fresh summons to be served on Rathee through dasti service, allowing the complainant to accompany the process server to facilitate service.
Despite the steps taken, the court was informed that the notice could not be served as the premises of Rathee's house was locked, leading to the issuance of the bailable warrant.
The video was also retweeted by Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) National Convenor Arvind Kejriwal in 2018, who later acknowledged before the Supreme Court that he had made a mistake by retweeting it.
The proceedings against Rathee had remained pending amid repeated difficulties in serving summons on him since 2019, with the complainant claiming that his continued absence from India had delayed the case.
The matter had also reached the Supreme Court in connection with Kejriwal's challenge to the criminal defamation proceedings arising from the retweet.
In February 2024, Kejriwal told the apex court that he had made a mistake by sharing the video. A Bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna, who later became Chief Justice of India (CJI) and has since retired, and Dipankar Datta had stayed the trial court proceedings against Kejriwal while hearing his plea challenging the Delhi High Court's refusal to quash the summons issued against him.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Court hearing will be held on October 31
Very likely · Within weeks

The Dubai International Financial Centre Courts launched blockchain-based digital credentials for court orders and hearing records, allowing instant global verification using Avalanche technology.

The Abu Dhabi Civil Defence Authority warns of a Dh30,000 fine for installing iron bars on upper-floor windows that obstruct emergency rescue operations, applying to all buildings except private villas.
Kuwait has issued Decree-Law No. 114 of 2026 governing mortgage financing for housing welfare beneficiaries, setting rules for supported and non-supported financing, repayment terms up to 25 years, and responsibilities of banks and financing entities, with the Ministry of Finance and Kuwait Credit Bank playing key roles in interest payments and guarantees.
The UAE's Federal Supreme Court overturned a deportation ruling for a resident convicted of consuming psychotropic substances, restoring the original Dh30,000 fine and ruling deportation cannot replace a fine.

An employer in the UAE may face a fine of AED 50,000 under Federal Decree-Law No. 29 of 2021 if they sponsor a foreigner for employment but fail to employ them or allow them to work for another party without legal procedures, as confirmed by the Dubai Court of Cassation in January 2025.
Dubai Police have seized 17 tankers and charged 18 suspects for illegal waste dumping. The incident highlights the UAE's tiered environmental penalty system, which includes fines ranging from Dh500 to Dh10 million for various violations under federal and local laws.