In the indictment prepared by the Bakırköy Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, it was stated that Denizolgun was found dead in his farm in Beykoz on September 7, 2016, and that an investigation was being carried out for the crime of "intentional murder" in this context. In the indictment, it was stated that within the scope of the investigation, the statement of the suspect Nurettin Demirkol, who worked as an internal medicine specialist in a hospital and was the victim's private doctor at the time of the incident, was taken as a "witness" by the prosecutor's office on August 26.
Accordingly, in his statement, Demirkol stated that the victim did not have a private doctor, that Murat Bayrak and a foreign national were there when he went to the farm, and that he did not consider the death of the victim as suspicious because he did not see blood on his face and body.
Stating that he did not know who called the police and that the police teams arrived an hour after he left, Demirkol said that he did not remember whether Alihan Kuriş, Ahmet Yum and Ahmet Gökçen came to the scene. Demirkol stated that he was at his residence in Kısıklı on the day of the incident and that he went to the Forensic Medicine Institute, but he did not remember who came.
In the indictment, it was noted that after the suspect's statement as a "witness" was taken, HTS and emergency call center records were sent to the file, and other people regarding the day of the incident were also heard as witnesses.
In the indictment, it was emphasized that according to the 155 emergency call report attached to the response letter of the Riva Police Station dated August 31, the suspect called the police, introduced himself as the family doctor and said that there was a suspicious death. The indictment also included the statements of other witnesses.
Accordingly, police officer Z.G., who was on duty at the Riva Police Station and was the first to arrive at the scene. In his statement as a "witness", he stated that the person who called them as the victim's private doctor said that he considered the death suspicious, and that after he gave the address, they arrived at the scene and were met by the doctor.
Crime scene investigation officer E.T. In his "witness" statement, he stated that the suspect introduced himself as Denizolgun's private doctor and said that he was from the family. In his "witness" statement, the expert doctor at the scene noted that there was a lawyer, 1.60 meters tall, next to the doctor at the scene, and that Alihan Kuriş also came to the scene.
In the indictment, it was stated that in the crime scene investigation and dead examination report in the investigation file of the Beykoz Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, suspect Demirkol stated that blood was leaking from the right side of the victim's mouth and soaked the pillow, and that the expert doctor stated that the victim's face was bloody and blood was still flowing from his mouth.
In the indictment, which stated that HTS records, witness statements, 155 call resolution report, law enforcement documents, crime scene investigation and dead examination report and the entire file, it was stated that the suspect's defenses to deny the confirmed crime were abstract and aimed at getting rid of the crime, and therefore they were not taken into account. It was stated that it was proven by the 155 emergency call report solution report and the statement of the police officer who arrived at the scene that the suspect called the police himself, although he declared that he did not know who called the police on the day of the incident.
In the indictment, it was stated that although Demirkol stated that he was not the victim's private doctor and that he did not consider the death suspicious, he introduced himself as the victim's private doctor to the police officer who arrived at the scene, the crime scene investigation officer and in the 155 emergency call notification and that he considered the death suspicious.
In the indictment, it was stated that although Demirkol stated that he did not see blood on the victim's face, he stated that blood was leaking from his mouth in the death examination report. It was stated that although he stated that he was at his residence in Kısıklı on the day of the incident, it was determined that there was no base signal in Kısıklı in the HTS records taken.
In the indictment, it was emphasized that Demirkol said that the victim was dead when he went to the farm on the day of the incident, but the fact that there were consecutive calls to the hospital in the HTS records was contradictory.
It was also stated in the indictment that the suspect stated that the police arrived about an hour after he went to the farm, but although the first phone call at the farm was 22.15, the time of the 155 call was 00.30.
Although the suspect stated that only Murat Bayrak and the foreign national were at the farm, it was determined that Hilmi Tuna Kuriş and Alihan Kuriş were also at the scene, based on the crime scene investigation report, HTS records and witness statements.
In the indictment, it was stated that there were other people with the suspect, that the phone signal received from Hilmi Tuna Kuriş at the farm was from before the suspect, and that there were consecutive conversation records between them, and that for these reasons, it was against the normal flow of life for the suspect to not know that there were no other people at the scene. It was also stated that although the suspect stated that Ahmet Gökçen was not in the Forensic Medicine Institute, it was understood that Gökçen was determined to be in the Forensic Medicine Institute, based on the HTS records taken.
In the indictment, it was stated that the suspect's act of making a false statement regarding the matters stated in the witness statement taken under oath within the scope of the investigation carried out for the crime of "deliberate murder" fell within the scope of the crime of "false testimony" and that it was understood that there was sufficient suspicion to file a public lawsuit against the suspect.
The indictment, which requested that suspect Demirkol be sentenced to 2 to 4 years in prison for the crime of "false testimony", was accepted by the Bakırköy Criminal Court of First Instance to which it was sent.
