The order marks a fresh development in long-running legal proceedings filed by BJP IT Cell member Vikas Pandey.
A Delhi court issued bailable warrants against YouTuber Dhruv Rathee on Saturday in a 2018 defamation case filed by BJP IT Cell member Vikas Pandey, amid ongoing legal proceedings.
AI-generated summary
The case stems from a complaint filed by Vikas Pandey in 2018 after Dhruv Rathee uploaded a video about him on his YouTube channel.
A Delhi court on Saturday issued bailable warrants against YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in a defamation case dating back to 2018. The order marks a development in the long-running legal proceedings involving the content creator. Details of the court's directions and the next steps in the case remain to be established.
A Delhi court on Saturday issued bailable warrants against YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in a 2018 defamation case filed by BJP IT Cell member Vikas Pandey, adding a fresh development to the legal proceedings that have been underway for several years.
The latest order comes days after the court issued fresh summons to Rathee, noting that efforts to serve him in the case had continued over several years.
The court had also recorded submissions by the complainant's counsel that Rathee ordinarily resides in Austria and had travelled to India to attend Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) protests in the national capital.
Judicial Magistrate Rahul Jain was hearing Pandey's plea seeking fresh summons to the YouTuber. In an order dated October 12, the court noted that Rathee had initially been summoned in July 2019 and directed that fresh summons be issued to him at his address in Gurugram, Haryana.
The case stems from a complaint filed by Pandey in 2018 after Rathee uploaded a video about him on his YouTube channel. Pandey, who is associated with the BJP's IT Cell, approached the court alleging defamation over the video.
In the proceedings earlier this week, Advocate Samaksh Sharma, appearing for Pandey, told the court that Rathee had been residing in Austria for the past seven years and had returned to India in connection with the CJP protests in Delhi.
The complainant's counsel argued that fresh summons were needed to enable prompt steps to serve the YouTuber.
The court, while considering the plea, observed that the complainant had been attempting to serve Rathee for several years. It subsequently directed that fresh summons be sent to his Gurugram address.
North Dakota ranchers and WBI Energy Transmission are before the US Supreme Court in a dispute over $300,000 in legal fees stemming from a natural gas pipeline easement challenge.
North Dakota ranchers and WBI Energy Transmission face the US Supreme Court over a $300,000 legal bill dispute regarding pipeline easements and state compensation laws.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant revealed that external forces created uncertainty surrounding the NLSIU's 34th annual convocation in Bengaluru, urging graduates to uphold legal values and defend justice.
The Supreme Court declared internet access a fundamental right for individuals and children under Articles 21 and 19(1)(a), stating safety and freedom are not at odds.
Delhi Traffic Police reschedules Lok Adalat hearings to October 25, 2026, after BRICS Summit deferment. Motorists can download challan slips starting October 19.
Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut submitted an explanation to the Supreme Court after receiving a show-cause notice for criminal contempt over remarks targeting the CJI and the judiciary following the rejection of an opposition delegation meeting.