
Clubs should not have to choose between paying again for facilities they have built and giving them up
The Hong Kong government is finalising lease extension terms for private recreation clubs by year-end, sparking controversy over fair land pricing and public access requirements that could force clubs to pay again for facilities they have built or give them up.
AI-generated summary
The Hong Kong government has set the end of 2026 as the deadline for finalising arrangements on extending leases of private recreation clubs. Setting a fair price for land use and arranging reasonable public access has been controversial for as long as the author can remember, last flaring up in 2018 when populist legislators complained about privileges enjoyed by a small number of wealthy people.
The Hong Kong government has set forth on a course of action which seems destined to upset large swathes of the middle class, including senior personnel from finance, business, technology and academia. These are the very people whose presence here underpins our professed economic development strategy.
I am referring, of course, to the discussions now reaching a climax on the terms for extending the leases of private recreation clubs. The government has set the end of this year as the deadline for finalising arrangements.
The subject of setting a fair price for use of the land on which the clubs sit, and arranging a reasonable degree of public access to them, has been controversial for as long as I can remember. It last flared up in 2018 when some populist legislators complained about the privileges enjoyed by a small number of wealthy people.

The National Center for the Performing Arts in Beijing displays a 100-meter scroll with the theme of Sun Yat-sen, adding chapters such as "Morning Light across the Taiwan Strait" and incorporating it into commemorative activities for the 160th anniversary of Sun Yat-sen's birth and the "Recovery of Taiwan". This article believes that cultural works can interpret history, but historical connections should not be said to be the only political choice, nor should they commemorate the same figure while omitting the systems, experiences and people's wishes of different societies.

Through the propaganda activities and political demands of the Fifth Plenary Session of the Communist Party of China, the article reflects on the value of Taiwan's freedom of speech, surveillance system, and separation of political parties and the country. It calls on the public to verify information, respect differences, and rationally supervise government and defense policies.

This article commemorates the 160th anniversary of Sun Yat-sen's birth and explores how he united overseas Chinese through the concept of "revitalizing China." Based on his personal experience, the author emphasizes that overseas Chinese should play a bridging role in safeguarding national interests, cherishing peace and cultural exchanges, and calls for finding common ground to cope with the challenges of the times.

China Youth Daily published a commentary article by Wang Jikun, an associate researcher at East China Normal University, analyzing how social networks transform offline comparisons of acquaintances into infinite upward comparisons pushed by algorithms, amplifying youth anxiety, and put forward self-anchoring suggestions of comparing efforts rather than starting points, growth rather than position, and admiration rather than inferiority complex.

Anne Lee recalled Taiwan's silent habit of "having ears but not mouths" during the martial law era. She compared Huang Zhifeng's ten-year prison sentence in Hong Kong with Taiwanese young people such as Shen Boyang who dared to speak out. She called on Taiwanese children to be able to tell the next generation with confidence that "having ears but not mouths" is a thing of the past.

The article explores young people's choice between high-paying vacancies in the technology industry and stable jobs in civil servants. It cites salary data from the Accounting and Accounting Office and starting salary standards for civil servants, analyzes the differences in remuneration between the two and suitable groups, and proposes that the government should provide reasonable workloads and transparent promotions to attract young people.