
The Alliance's new defense strategy assumes the integration of modern technologies with traditional weapons in the face of potential aggression.
AI-generated summary
The strategy outlines NATO's actions in the event of a Russian invasion. The document was prepared by General Aleksus Grinkiewicz.
The strategy specifies detailed actions of the Alliance in the event of a Russian invasion of NATO territory. It was developed by the Supreme Commander of NATO Allied Forces in Europe, General Aleksus Grinkiewicz.
One of the main changes in NATO's approach concerns the use of new technologies. The Alliance plans to combine traditional weapons and military units with solutions whose development was significantly accelerated by the war in Ukraine. This mainly concerns self-controlled drones and target acquisition means using artificial intelligence.
In the event of a Russian attack, NATO plans to first deter the invasion using ground forces and other resources under the "NATO Eastern Wing Containment Initiative." Then it will focus on destroying the command systems of the Russian army - this will quickly weaken its ability to fight and, consequently, lead to the defeat of the Russian forces.
Stop Russia before the war breaks out
The new strategy emphasizes the defensive nature of NATO and assumes avoiding actions that could unnecessarily lead to the escalation of the conflict.
The document also points to the need to jointly counteract hybrid threats aimed at Alliance countries. These are actions that do not yet mean an open war, but may seriously threaten the security of NATO countries.
Deterrence is a key element of the strategy. The Alliance wants to show that it is ready to defend itself and that a potential opponent will not be able to defeat it.
Grinkiewicz's spokesman, Colonel Martin O'Donnell, did not reveal the details of the document, but emphasized that "The theory of victory of the Supreme Commander of the NATO Armed Forces in Europe is simple: maintain NATO's advantage."
As O'Donnell added, due to the unstable situation in the world, the Alliance must now create conditions to stop aggression and be ready to win in the event of an attack.
How did the war in Ukraine affect NATO's plans?
NATO wants to make wider use of not only drones on the battlefield, but also automated systems and artificial intelligence. The document is also intended to encourage NATO countries to further increase defense spending and prepare for the possibility of conflict.
European allies have already increased defense spending. However, there is an ongoing discussion in NATO countries about how to best use this money. This includes: about finding the right balance between traditional weapons, such as tanks, and new technologies that have proven their worth during the war in Ukraine.

The Ministry of National Defense presented a new "Ryś" camouflage developed with the Special Forces, which will gradually replace the current "Pantera" pattern in all types of the Polish Armed Forces.

Germany risks being drawn into a violent conflict with Russia, which poses the most immediate and specific threat, said the head of German intelligence, Martin Jaeger. Chancellor Friedrich Merz was in Kiev yesterday.

As a result of Sunday's attack, fires broke out in aircraft parking areas and in an ammunition warehouse at Khanskaya airport in Russia. The Militarnyj portal published satellite photos showing the destruction.

The operation to neutralize British air sea mines in Świnoujście has begun and will last until October 8. Restrictions on navigation, a bathing ban on a several-kilometer stretch of the coast and RCB alerts were introduced.

There have been warnings in the public sphere that the draft is formally suspended, not abolished. Is the return of conscription really one of the scenarios for which the country should be prepared? Who and in what situation could decide to suspend it? Is Poland prepared today for a rapid increase in army numbers? We will also ask about Poland's security and the future of the American military presence in our country. Donald Trump talked about progress towards establishing a permanent US Army base in Poland. At the same time, there are signals from Washington about a change in the deployment of some American troops and the return of "tens of thousands" of soldiers to the US. Should Pete Hegseth's words worry Poland? Can increasing the permanent American presence really compensate for a possible reduction in the rotational presence of US troops in Europe? During the conversation, we will also return to the dispute over the role of the president and the government in security policy. Who should conduct talks with the Donald Trump administration? Can competitive communication channels of the Presidential Palace and the government strengthen Poland's position in Washington, or, on the contrary, do they make it difficult to pursue a coherent foreign and defense policy?

The Government Security Center issued an alert for residents of the Lublin and Podkarpackie voivodeships in connection with the Russian air attack on Ukraine. The warning about Polish aviation operations was canceled after 27 minutes.