
AI-generated summary
KVKK, işverenlerin çalışanların iletişim araçlarını denetleme konusunda net sınırlar getiren bir ilke kararı yayınladı. Bu karar, işverenlerin denetim yetkisi ile çalışanların gizlilik hakları arasında denge kurmayı amaçlıyor.
Resmi Gazete’de yayımlanan ilke kararında, iletişim araçlarının işverene ait olmasının sınırsız denetim yetkisi vermediği vurgulandı. KVKK, “İletişim araçlarının işverene ait olması ya da iş yerinde bulunması tek başına işverene sınırsız ve mutlak bir denetim yetkisi tanımamaktadır” dedi.
İşveren, özel kullanıma ilişkin yasak ve sınırları çalışana önceden bildirmek zorunda olacak. Denetimin kapsamı, içeriğe hangi durumlarda erişileceği ve verilerin ne süre saklanacağı da çalışana açıklanacak. İçerik denetimi ise ancak erişimin zorunlu olduğu istisnai hallerde yapılabilecek. Gizli izleme ve çalışanın tüm işlemlerini ayrım gözetmeden kaydeden yöntemler hukuka aykırı sayılacak.

A lethal injection attempt with two doses of pentobarbital administered to Christa Pike in Tennessee failed, and Pike was left with limited walking and talking a week later. Governor Bill Lee suspended executions and launched an independent investigation. Pike's lawyers want the sentence to be commuted to life imprisonment, but there is still no final decision; Three basic scenarios are on the agenda: retrial with the same method, execution by electric chair or hanging, or reduction of the sentence to life imprisonment.

An attempted enforcement effort against Christa Pike in Tennessee with a lethal double dose of pentobarbital failed, leaving Pike with limited ability to walk and talk. Governor Bill Lee suspended the enforcements and launched an independent investigation. Pike's lawyers want the sentence to be commuted to life imprisonment, but there is still no final decision and three basic scenarios are being discussed.

At the Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court, the undetained defendant Deniz Dörtyol argued that he was forced to pay bills through Kültür AŞ and Medya AŞ, and that he was forced to pay with threats during the dismantling of advertising areas and the tender process; He stated that he had to pay all invoices issued by Kültür AŞ between 2019-2021.

At the hearing at the Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court, the defendant Ali Nuhoğlu argued that it was wrong to carry out the Cebeci dump site operations through a single person and that more appropriate results could be achieved with the management of İSFALT. He also stated that Ekrem İmamoğlu had knowledge of the purchase process of two villas in Sarıyer, that they were purchased at the request of Tuncay Yılmaz and that he paid 31 million lira. He stated that Murat Gülibrahimoğlu put pressure on the municipal bureaucrats and that Fatih Keleş acted as Ekrem İmamoğlu's advisor.

The hearing was held at the Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court, and the defendants Derya Dağdeviren and Ahmet Sari, who were not detained within the scope of the corruption investigation against Esenyurt Municipality, stated; Dağdeviren claimed that he wanted to file a criminal complaint against Orhan Yıldırım, while Sari claimed that Ertan Yıldız and Fatih Keleş were asked for money and paid extortion during the process of collecting their receivables related to the Havaist work and the IMM tender.

Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office ordered journalists İsmail Saymaz, Murat Ağırel and Şaban Sevinç to be present for testimony on the grounds that they made misleading statements to the public within the scope of the fund investigation.